Ok, the next whole post has been scavenged from one of Cat Nastey’s old blogs. She currently used to blogs at Pussy Tales but I found this at Cat Nastey. [Note: Neither of Nastey’s blog are available any longer even in caches. —fl]
She’s got a great point — that a lot of people complain that they don’t get enough sex, but that various biases, inhibitions, and strong preferences tend to limit the number of people they’re willing to have sex with.
Wednesday, October 08, 2003
Interesting thought…
I was hanging out with a friend of mine last night and we got to talking about sex…big surprise with my friends!!
Both my friend and I consider "sex" to be more then just about the
penis-in-hole action and tend to get frustrated with partners (straight guys)
who seem to have this "penis-in-hole-or-nothing" attitude when it
comes to "sex" and the having of "it". For us,
"sex" can involve many different activities from mutual masturbation to oral sex and doesn’t (nor should it) involve JUST the penis-in-hole definition.We started joking that most straight guys complain that they aren’t getting
enough sex and that "non-straight" people seem to be having lots and
lots of sex…well, what if it’s all about the definition? Wouldn’t it make
more sense that one might be getting more "sex" if one included more
activities into the the definition of "sex"?So…what do people think? How do you define S-E-X??
She’s got a point.
Incidentally if you’re into reading blog archives Cat Nastey’s a good one.
Enjoy it while you can, though. Her final post says "With time, I will
delete this blog so change your links…eventually. I hope you enjoy the new
site!!"
I sort of hope not. She had a lot to say that I’d hate to see lost forever.



