According to the online version of the Portland Oregonian newspaper yet another arch-conservative — this time the longtime chairman of the Oregon Christian Coalition — has been accused of sexual perfidity — this time for sexually molesting three of his female relatives. Oh yeah, when they were pre-teens.
Two of the alleged molestations occurred decades ago and likely would not result in criminal charges because state law limits prosecution of certain crimes. For example, the statute of limitations on sex abuse expires after six years.
One case, however, may fall within statutory timelines, authorities confirmed. That investigation involves a female family member who was allegedly molested by [the alleged perpetrator] when she was in elementary school, authorities said.
Here’s the paragraph that’s important to me:
[The alleged perpetrator’s] family members told The Oregonian that they called the child abuse hot line last month after several women in the family said they openly discussed for the first time what happened with [the alleged perpetrator.] The names of the family members have been withheld because The Oregonian generally doesn’t identify alleged sex abuse victims.
[emphasis mine —fl] Read the whole thing here.
Ok, so here’s the deal. First of all, as Alfred Kinsey famously said, sexual repression turns ordinary desire into obsession — ordinary horiness with no acceptable outlet leads over and over to sexual activity with totally inappropriate and often defenseless victims. Second of all, sexual repression prevents victims of obsession from coming forward — the horrific consequences of saying anything allows predators to reoffend with near impunity. Finally, both victims and predators, mired in guilt, denial, and often trauma, adopt grotesque denial-based behavior and often agitate to have their grotesqueries forced down everybody’s throats.
Chances are extremely high that this gentleman would have strongly preferred to have ordinary, probably fairly vanilla sex with someone his own age had he been honest enough with himself and others about his ordinary, probably fairly vanilla urges. Instead, in order to maintain an objectively artificial standard of morality and to avoid a little embarrassment, he fucked little elementary school girls he was — by objectively legitimate standards of morality — he should have protected. And, evidently to compensate, he became the leader of a group committed to making our moral standards even more artificial.
Jane, of Unauthorized Bootlegging worries a lot that her attraction to BDSM alienates her from her church.
I was scared to tell any of my Christian friends. It would be 6 months before I told my two closest friends from church what was going on for me. They are still my friends, although they are not kinky and I think they still worry about me. After a few initial conversations, I have not continued to talk to them about my kinky journey.
But you know what? A) Because she’s confronting it in herself, restricting her expressioni to a certain extent yes, but not denying it to herself, finding outlets she can comfortably express her feelings, she’s not likely to do anything insanely stupid and destructive either to herself or others. B) She believes she’s “a minority within a minority” but since she can’t find anyone to talk about it with I don’t see how she can possibly know that.
I’ll repeat my favorite insight from Thoreau: “My excuse for not lecturing against the use of tobacco is, that I never [used] it” Where there’s smoke there’s fire, guys. No, I’m not saying that everyone who runs into the arms of ‘wingers are sexual monsters, and no, I’m not even saying that everyone driven into their arms is a victim of such a monster, but as far as I’m concerned radical antagonism towards sex remains, and should be treated as, a big red flag that something is terribly, terribly wrong.




Submitted by 402 (not verified) on Mon, 2005-10-10 17:28.
Oi Vay!!!
Oi Vay!!!
Oi Vay!!!
I saw you had a guy hitting on you in an earlier post... heheh
Thats my job!
Gah!
Send him my way... I have JUST what he needs.
mwahahahahaha
Submitted by 402 (not verified) on Mon, 2005-10-10 21:24.
We've had two of these situations in my extended family. I'm not a huge fan of Freud's rap, but this is a geothermal theory of the mind I can buy: desire suppressed will ooze, burble, or explode in the most unfortunate ways. Toxic secrets. It's tragic, what happens to families in the wake of these revelations.
[Or, in the cases I'm talking about, it's tragic what happens to our whole flinkin' society when they try and paper it over as if it was someone else's depravity instead of their own. $#!%~@$# (For what it's worth I don't mention Freud, but then he wasn't the first to make the observation. --fl]
Submitted by 402 (not verified) on Tue, 2005-10-11 05:32.
Well, I've never understood why religions want to suppress sex when it is something that comes natrually. I guess this is one of the unfortunate results.
[Hi Challenge. I for one *can* understand why (some influential denominations of some) religions want to suppress sex. Understanding, or even sympathizing, isn't the same as accepting, however. I don't like all the reasons, and in particular I think some reasons are egregiously counterproductive to the desired result. --fl]
Submitted by 402 (not verified) on Tue, 2005-10-11 06:59.
oops, didn't mean to suggest you were talking psychology. Just my own off-the-cuff reflection. The social hypocrisy of it all is infuriating and strangely lost in the public commentary, which loves to dwell on the salacious aspects or just policy prescriptions.
cheers,
[No problem, Goose. Technically I was talking social theory with an emphasis on psychological abnormalities that result from social/moral policies that, in circular fashion, a) exacerbates rather than mitigates deviancy and b) propagates itself by recruiting further deviancy and c) provides *protective coloration* for those deviants. In short we're still on the same page. Take care, --fl]
Submitted by 402 (not verified) on Tue, 2005-10-11 09:17.
At the risk of upsetting someone ... the belief that sex is the original sin has blighted the church, particularly the flavour from Rome, for millennia. Surely the original sin was man's ability to question God's will, as interpreted by celibate priests.
No, I believe that the church uses sexual denial because it is the most potent form of mind control available. Piety and celibacy become mixed and then you have the situation you describe. The natural and indescribably powerful sexual urges we all have build up and eventually wreak havoc on the "pious" and those unfortunate enough to be close to them.
Good sex, consenting and joyous sexs, sets people free, the last thing you want if you’re into the control of an empire which spans the globe.
I’ll get ready for the hate mail …
Just one thing, I can’t remember any instance of an Anglican and therefore non-celibate minister being involved with any sexual impropriety with his congregation. I’m sure someone will correct me if I’m wrong.
Alex
[Well, there's the good news and there's the bad news. While non-celibate clergy are considerably less likely to abuse children (though that happens) they're far more likely to have sex with adult congregants, particularly of women in their congregations. I suspect you're right that Anglicans may be more moderate but charismatic evangelicals tend to be, well, very charismatic.
You raise a staggeringly good point on the original sin bit. You're right that original sin was not about sex at all but about eating (Ah hah!) and consequently learning about good and evil. Sex, or at least painful birth, was supposed to be the *punishment* for eating that fruit. Which leads one to wonder how obsessing about sex per se gets us anywhere. --fl]
Submitted by 402 (not verified) on Tue, 2005-10-11 13:36.
I don't know. I feel like this can be true, suppressed desire oozing into real life in inappropriate forms, but then again, I hate to agree because I feel like making excuses for stuff like this isn't what I want to do either.
In my own life, I think that when I've suppressed certain wants, they become a fixation. Sometimes the fixation gets out of hand and then you binge. Sometimes you can't think about anything else.
I hate the way American culture treats sex like it's not happening. Hello?!? It is, and ignoring it just makes it worse. Argh.
[Yep, there are so many other much sweeter things that could be oozing up in a different way... and driving us crazy, again in a very different way. --fl]
Submitted by 402 (not verified) on Tue, 2005-10-11 14:39.
I think that was Gander posting earlier. But I agree with what he said.
Goose
[Oops. Sorry if I mixed you up. --fl]