A window into contemporary prostitution

| | Comments (3)

A few days ago I asked who (in aggregate, not individually) worked as escorts prostitutes for Deborah Jean Palfrey's "adult fantasy services" company. Evidently she tended to hire, among others, "university professors, legal secretaries, scientists, [and] military officers."

Today Ben Smith of the new-ish online political magazine Politico provides one possible clue courtesy of the Internet Archive foundation's Wayback Machine.

Here's the "DC Escorts Wanted" page from the 2002 version of Palfrey's "Pamela Martin & Associates" website:

Pamela Martin and Associates is a professional, adult/outcall agency, servicing the entire Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. Currently, PM is seeking females only, with or without experience, for the position of escort/outcall. The following are required for employment consideration:

  1. Minimum age 23 (no maximum)
  2. Weight proportionate to height
  3. Two or more years of college education
  4. Must hold a day job or attend school regularly
  5. Must own or have access to an automobile
  6. Must have a cellular or car telephone
  • Established in 1993, Pamela Martin and Associates is considered Washington's premier adult service.
  • Entirely female managed, PM's philosophy is to develop an on-going and sound relationship of mutual respect and consideration, with each and every staff member.
  • For those individuals without experience, regular guidance and assistance is offered, by seasoned professional (s).
  • Excellent income and flexible hours allow for the position to be a wonderful "moonlighting" adjunct to daytime employment or needed funds to continue education. A repeat clientele of almost 75% ensures a "comfort level" unprecedented in the business.
  • Physical safety issues are judiciously monitored, by management, while "on-call" and only those hotels, neighborhoods and areas deemed respectable are visited by PM personnel.
  • Acting as an independent agent, an escort has the right of refusal, at any time, for any reason, when given an appointment. Additionally, professional and fair dispatch staff allows for the escort's nightly schedule to be conducted in a smooth and productive manner.
  • Applicants need to contact, Julia, after 5pm, daily... (301) 231-5800

[See the whole page, lousy site design and all, here.

And while we're at it, here's the front (and only other) page from her 2002 site

  • Pamela Martin and Associates is a professional escort/out-call service operating in the D.C. metropolitan area, with service to all surrounding suburbs and limited service to the 410 area code. Established in 1993, PM enjoys a reputation of being, undoubtedly, the best adult agency around, with an approximate, on-going repeat clientele rate of 65-75%.
  • The staff is comprised of those individuals ages 23 and up, with two or more years of college education, who either work and/or go to school in the daytime.
  • Rates are a flat $275 for a 90 minute appointment. No additional charges beyond this amount are expected or required.
  • Open 7 days a week beginning at 5pm daily.
  • Best selection and availability before 9pm each evening.
  • Cash or traveler's checks only.

See that here.

Ok. So. Due in large part to the horrific toll serial killers have taken on shadow-landed and gray-area'd subsistence prostitutes in my region I've been advocating outright legalization of prostitution since beginning this blog.

But various credible reports suggest that subsistence/street prostitutes represent no more than 20% of the profession. Sure, you can't spend much time on the blogosphere without encountering perfectly self-aware middle-class prostitutes who, for all their visibility might still represent only another very narrow slice of the profession. But now there's Palfrey's site with its prerequisites: two years of college, day job, well into adulthood, car and phone; and its benefits: security monitoring, only reputable neighborhoods and hotels, right to refuse calls, "technical" support. Note further there were up to 15,000 client phone numbers in Palfrey's records so it's not like she or her employees were hurting for work.

So I've got a couple of questions: How accurate are the stories we tell ourselves about prostitution overall? You better believe that some women are trafficked big time -- at least out here on the West coast you hear about a major bust of a brothel full of enslaved women about once a month. And that life for many prostitutes is a precarious Hell, as evidenced by the likes of Green River murderer Gary Ridgeway who killed on the order of one hundred typically very young street prostitutes, is what brought the issue to my attention in the first place. But... but... but... then there are Palfrey's employees, and the employees of thousands and thousands of Yellow-Page-listed escort services just like Palfrey's.

So I'm left wondering, again, why exactly prostitution is a crime. Don't get me wrong, I understand perfectly why it's not socially beneficial in a society with so many layers of sexual inequality. But if strip clubs aren't illegal, and pornography isn't illegal, and if gambling is no longer illegal, and alcohol (for heaven's sake!) is legal, and 10,000 other equally social-infrastructure-fracturing enterprises that I don't want to have anything to do with (including, by the way, nearly all "escort" services) then how, exactly, do we benefit from keeping people like Palfrey and her employees working out of sight and under the table?

I mean, at the very least, if prostitution was legalized and regulated even to the extent that, say, fast food handlers are regulated, then wouldn't people less two-faced than Randall Tobias be better able to recruit them to halt the spread of infectious diseases? (The current policy of pretending you can ask even high-ranking officials to practice abstinence and faithfulness is a manifestly *not* going to succeed.)

I mean, at the very least, if prostitution was legalized and regulated even to the extent that, say, nail salon employees were regulated, then wouldn't authorities less two-faced than Randall Tobias and Ted Haggard (who also employed male "escorts") be better able to recruit them to help stamp out the plagues of trafficking and street-level pimps and others who rob, rape, rough up, and casually murder subsistence/street prostitutes?

I mean... if Palfrey was able to recruit them for her purposes, there's no reason to believe that, if their "moonlighting" work was legal, we couldn't recruit them for something socially worthwhile while we're at it?

3 Comments

Amber said

Wonderful.

I love all the posts you've been doing on this topic. I've got a bunch of 'em bookmarked in BlogLines, in that mental "blog about it when I find time" file. And with each passing day, I'm blown away and find something MORE to bookmark here!

Standing ovation from me.

[Great, Amber! I obviously have a conviction that everyone's knee-jerk "whee, a sex scandal" reflexes are masking what ought to be an actual *substantive policy* scandal. Thanks! --fl]

Amber said

I do have one nitpick - your use of "socially worthwhile" seems to imply that sex work is not socially worthwhile. I don't think that's how you meant it, but just pointing it out in case you want to clarify.

[Call it a Schrodinger's Cat position. If things went the way I think they ought to then there's still be sex work, more than there is now maybe, but it wouldn't look anything like today's. Part of my two-mindedness (two-facedness?) is that while I'm perfectly comfortable with sex workers I'm more than a bit tetchy about their *customers.* Hope that makes sense. Thanks, Amber. --fl]

Dana said

Prostitution is now legal in NZ. It's still pretty crap because it's only legal in the CBD (not residential areas) so women who want to work alone are pretty screwed - costs are prohibitory in town obviously.

I really hope it's helped women who get into bad situations as prostitutes, but we don't hear much about it so I don't know.

It's amazing, a while ago there was a news piece on an American planning to open a huge fancy brothel for which the access was through a popular mall. I heard comments about cliental going through an area with CHILDREN, gosh! I just thought "wow, how to miss the point"

I don't know that it's made a significant difference to the industry (I did a trial working as a barmaid at a small brothel - decided the hours would kill me! - and the women were really cool, but pretty cynical about the fact that they fit the stereotype of intending to do "just a year" but they were used to the money - no drugs), I can only hope there have been some positives.

Anyone else ever feel like "vice squads" are just a little party for cops to go abuse women? I mean MY GOD. How many women have been raped or otherwise abused by "vice squad" cops? The whole idea sounds like a plan set up by rapists. *vomit*

[Yeah, based on my own experience with low-level cops when I was a bartender in my old hometown the fact that they often (definitely not always) shake down prostitutes is yet another reason I think it should be legalized. Cops and prostitutes really *really* ought to be able to work together more, especially as in my area where so many of them were being murdered. Instead the cops (the majority) who are really trying to help have to do this weird dance and the rest it's just another hammer to hold over the prostitutes' heads. Anyway, my point isn't that legalization would make prostitution all just peachy wonderful for everyone involved. Just that it would peel off a lot of the layers that *keep us from confronting the situation. That plus keep a lot more prostitutes alive and relatively healthy than the present system does. Thanks, Dana. --fl]

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by figleaf published on May 2, 2007 5:22 PM.

Another entry in the perennial shaving debate was the previous entry in this blog.

HNT - No shirt, no shoes, no service? is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Blogs and Links

New and/or interesting

A

B-C

D-E

F-I

J-K

L

M

N-R

S

T-Z

Reference

Library

Sites

Random Stuff