
Photo by Flickr user Slice. Used under a Creative Commons license.
So years ago some friends of mine took high-tech jobs in a little mini-Silicon Valley in, of all places, Provo, Utah. Coming as they did from places like Chicago, Santa Cruz, and Albuquerque there were some cultural adjustments. One evening early on, after a close examination of the Yellow Pages, they made their way to the deli in town (*the* deli in town!) for snacks. One of my friends asked what kind of cheeses they had. Brimming with pride the clerk informed them they had both kinds of cheese, yellow and white… Velveeta.
That story sprang to mind when I read about Audacia Ray of Waking Vixen and director of a very nice alt-porn video called The Bi Apple wrestling with the reality that is the, er, industrial porn industry.
In pornoland, bisexual means that the dudes touch each other too. And that’s what I wanted my movie to be. In pornoland, bisexual films fall under the rubric of “gay,” they aren’t included in the world of AVN, they are the propriety of GAYVN. Pornoland is trying to teach us something here: you’re either straight or you’re gay.
I knew, of course, that bisexual movies are weird things, that porn companies don’t understand who the market for these kinds of movies might be, but I also learned from Adam and Eve that without any promotion whatsoever their series “Fine Bi Me,” which is pretty bad porn but is bisexual, has sold briskly. I knew people wanted to see this stuff, and that it could sell, and when Adam and Eve Pictures gave me the chance, I was on it.
...
This week AVN announced the nominations for the awards that will be given in Vegas in January. Reading through the titles of these movies, with classics like “Slant Eye for the Straight Guy” (a nom for Best Asian-Themed Series) and “We All Scream for Ass Cream 2″ (a nom for Best Internal Release), is truly a trip through crazyland, even for someone jaded like me. This year, the list of noms is 58 pages long. ... The GAYVN nomination process is wrapping up this week, and the list of categories is a long too – there are 39 of them.
...
Wow. I’m trying to figure out what this is about, and I know it is not about demand – The Bi Apple has been a best seller for Adam & Eve on a consistent basis since it became available in February, and other bi titles (even bad ones, which is most of them) sell well. It’s really just got to be about the close-mindedness of the adult industry, and the refusal to find space for different kinds of titles.
Got that? The porn staple “bisexual woman” is actually straight, and movies like Dacia’s that feature men and women, women and women, men and men, and FMM and FFM three-ways are gay. And while such movies sell steadily and well they’re an invisible 4th dimension to those who market and distribute them.
In other words, industrial pornographers make porn for both kinds of people: straight and gay!
And you can’t say it’s for lack of imagine on their part. (Trust me, I like to pretend I have imagination but I doubt I’d ever dreamed up a title so creatively sexist, racist, stereotypist, and pop-culture-derivative-while-simultaneously-tin-eared as “Slant Eye For The Straight Guy.”) Instead it’s just that for any marginal talk of “liberated” or “sexually revolutionary” (or other words borrowed from the early 1970s) pornography as an industry is as thoroughly culturally conservative as the 700 Club… and as thoroughly invested in it.
In terms of the porn/anti-porn debate as articulated by, say, Renegade Evolution on the pro side and Robert Jensen on the anti side, the reality of industrialists like AVN and GAYVN need to be confronted — not just acknowledged but confronted! — by people who think porn’s either harmless or cool. Conversely, the reality of dissidents like Dacia Ray needs to be acknowledged — acknowledged not confronted — by those who think pornography can only be a threat or a menace.
As someone who actually sells porn (okay, something that didn’t work out, so I’m just trying to get rid of what I have left on the online markets) I would like to say that it appears that when porn is divided strictly into “straight” and “gay” categories, they usually put MF, FF, and FFM into “straight” and put MM, MMF, and anything involving transsexuals into “gay”. If there’s more than two categories, then FFM goes under straight and MMF goes under Bi.
Apparently, this is based on the assumed sexuality of any male viewers watching it because the rare female viewer is totally irrelevant to them.
[Right! Because as far as the major distributors are concerned only two kinds of people buy porn: straight men and gay men, and straight men don’t like to see male/male sex. Which would be fine if, for instance, women never bought porn and if they did they were no more interested in “boy/boy” sex as men are in “girl/girl.” And that’s the weird thing about those guys, they’re so flipping prim (not to mention deeply, conservatively misogynistic) they disapprove of women watching porn! (Instead for years I keep hearing that, especially in suburban video stores, women rent up to a third of the “behind the curtain” titles. Don’t know if it’s true, I just keep hearing that.) Thanks, Nightfall. —fl]
This is why I only buy porn from Blowfish anymore. Look at all these fabulous categories!
[Thanks, Plymouth! —fl]
Slant eye? Holy shit! SLANT EYE?
I guess the reasoning is “it’s porn so it’s already trash, we haven’t got any lower to sink,” but DAMN.
See, this is why we as a society need to accept porn. So we can have some freakin’ standards for it. Not “this act/orientation is okay, this one is icky” standards, but just the same ones we have for the rest of our media goods. Right now there’s no criticism, or if there is, it’s directed at porn as a whole and not at specific offenders.
I don’t think porn as an industry can get better until it starts getting reviewed by the same standards as other direct-to-DVD releases. A column in Entertainment Weekly on the classy porn of the moment would do a lot to suppress “Filthy Slut Whores Get What They Deserve #46”.
[Good point about how acceptance would (seemingly) decrease virulence… but it worked for casinos (which I think are gross) and alcohol (bootleggers had no reason to machine-gun each other and innocent passers-by after Prohibition was lifted)... heck, even Disney’s Mickey Mouse got toned down from, basically, a vandal and a troublemaker in the earliest cartoons to a bland, even sedated corporate spokesman today. So why not porn? Also yeah, “slant eye?” WTF? —fl]
Post new comment