So this evening I caught maybe the last 15 seconds of a public-radio story having something to do with a 14-year-old girl and her newborn daughter both in child-protective custody and… someone with a male name — the baby’s father? Her father? — on the lam. So that’s, like, literally all I know about it.
Except for one more thing. The last line mentioned that couples were coming forward with offers to adopt the baby, as if it was a good thing.
And it might have been. The 14-year-old mother might be in trouble herself. She and her infant might be in custody because the infant had been in jeopardy. That’s one of the consequences of knowing only a fragment of what could be a far more complex story.
But knowing no more than I did, it struck me as odd that couples were stepping forward to adopt the infant but not his or her mother.
And, again, maybe if I’d heard the story that would have made perfect sense. The mother could be in trouble with the law in her own right, she may have been an unsuitable mother as well as an unsuitable age, her health might be compromised… who knows.
So I won’t comment on that particular case…
But I wonder…
There are so many other very young girls who become pregnant, and so often (assuming she’s been prohibited from terminating the pregnancy or chooses to remain pregnant of her own free will) the assumed best thing is for her to give her baby up to one of those couples who are always so quick to volunteer. And maybe that often is the best bet… maybe it’s just a coincidence that those who long-ago surrendered their children of teen pregnancy are uniformly more wistful, more regretful than those who terminated their pregnancies instead. Maybe so.
And I don’t know, maybe the 14-year-old in the story, the one with all the couples lining up to “take” her baby should it be offered to them… or if not her then other girls like her…
Golly, maybe it would be nice if a few couples stepped forward and offered to adopt them both! Because goodness knows if someone, even a child, goes to all the trouble, the risk, the labor of having a child of her own, then would it be too much to ask to give her a home to raise her child in? I’d imagine quite a few have needed it.
And, I don’t know, I guess I’m also imagining that couples who look forward to adopting an infant child might not find it so tough to adopting an infant grandchild, and her young mother, instead.
I wonder if anyone’s offered in this case? My partner and I already have our hands full, and I can’t say without waking her to ask whether she’d consider adopting both rather than splitting parent and child. But after those few seconds of airtime I have to admit I’d think seriously about it, and I think other couples might as well.
I just wonder if its come up before and if so how it’s worked.
I heard that story. The guy on the run is the baby’s dad, who is many years older than the baby’s mom. So, should he be caught, he’ll be facing charges dealing with the abandonment of the baby and the statutory rape of a young teenager.
But, yeah, I agree with pretty much everything you said. I was kind of outraged when they got to the line about people wanting to adopt the baby. My first thought was also, “what about the mom?’ If the girl decided to stay pregnant and keep the baby, then she should be allowed to raise it (assuming that she’s otherwise not unfit), and she should be given the help that she’ll need to do so. However, maybe it’s just my lack of faith in humanity, but I can’t see many people lining up to adopt both her and the baby. Or even considering it, really.
[Well, except that… here’s the thing, ks — you and I both considered it at least as a problem. And I’ve been considering it as something I’d talk to people about doing, whether the underage parent was a girl with an older man on the run or, as could have been the case with Mary Kay Letourneau and Vili Fualaau, a boy with an older woman in prison. The point being that while I love children, love being a parent, and love my children, I’m not necessarily attached to the idea that they’re by “my children” I mean my-possessed-by-me. We already know how many “older” children (what a funny oxymoron) go wanting when it comes to adoption… hmm… if I don’t stop typing now this could turn into another post. :-) Thanks! —fl]
I was involved with animal rescue for a few years, and it’s the same there. The babies, they’re little and cute and helpless-everyone wants them.
But the older ones, everyone assumes that they come with problems, or they’re not as cute, or they’re just easier to look past.
I’m sure all these big-hearted people aren’t even thinking about this 14 year old girl as a victim, they see her as a girl who got herself pregnant and probably has all sorts of other problems and that would never really be their daughter anyway. So why bother? A baby is easier, they can start from the beginning, it will be theirs. She’s too young to really be a mother too, right?
Conventional thinking dies hard, and like you say, we don’t know the whole story. What I would really hate to see is this poor girl getting pregnant again and again because no one bothers to show her that getting involved with guys like the baby’s father is the only way to have love in her life.
[Actually if I wasn’t trying to take a sabbatical from cranky imputations I might say what they’re thinking is probably more along the lines of “oh good, we can rely on public outcry and private shame, plus minor status to pry this baby away from his or her mother, and for extra credit we can get kudos for being so magnanimous.” :-) But instead I’m going to believe it’s more a matter of it just not occurring to people to try and really foster older children, even when they’ve got children of their own, and — like you say, norby, give them not just support but help them form a network of support that goes beyond meal-on-table/diaper-on-baby. —fl]
I agree with what you’ve said about the adoption offers and norby’s comment about older animal adoptions much like children. But are you jumping the gun a little bit here? The mother is 14 – in all likelihood she has some sort of guardian and has no need to be adopted. There are many reasons as to why she would be in protective custody right now and still have parents.
Is it impossible to believe that the mother may have loving parents who simply weren’t aware of her relationship with the older father? That would bring the question as to the quality of parenting, but don’t all children, especially teens, keep secrets from their parents?
I haven’t heard the story, so forgive any factual errors, but to go ahead and assume that the mother is in need of adoption when there is no mention of her being without guardianship? Unless it is stated, it probably wouldn’t occur to me that she is in need of adoption. I can understand the offers coming in to adopt the baby, because the mother may not want to keep it, as she may not be prepared to raise a child, etc. But rather than look at the lack of offers to adopt both mother and child as something wrong with society, maybe people, like me, assume that the mother already has a guardian and so there is no need to offer.
[Hi Kreger. I was pretty clear in my original text that I didn’t know anything else about this particular situation. And it’s possible I was just reacting to the way the reporter concluded the story with something like “the baby is in the custody of {child services} and the mother is also in the custody of {child services}” which made it sound like they’ve already been separated. And, if separated with prospective adoptive couples circling, it occurred to me how easily she and her child might never be reunited. But anyway, yes, absolutely we can hope that she really does have loving parents somewhere who can parent her and grandparent her children. And one hopes passionately that all other young homeless parents might be reunitable with their families as well. But! If not then I, at least, hope with equal passion that arrangements might be made so they could be fostered without (involutary) separation. Thanks, Kreger. —fl]
i have a dream that when i’m older and ready to do something else i write to oprah or whoever and she finances a ranch for me… and therein i rescue foster children and put them back together enough that they can put the next ones back together and just grow something really amazing.
i have a lot more thought here than this okay… this is just a start but yeah i want to rescue the ones no one wants…
(i ended up with a five month old kitten but i was looking for a cat eighteen months to three years… and my other cat is unknown age as she is a rescue… just to make the animal rescue guy feel better… [kitten chose me and fits perfectly with existing cat… she knew best])
I think the other part to this equation is the concept of extended family that Kreger made passing reference to above. Probably much more useful than promoting the idea of adoption of both mother and baby is promoting the value of extended family in our society. It’s an idea that has really gone by the wayside. That’s why there are kids trying to raise kids on their own, inside of benefiting from the wisdom and physical help of older generations of the same family. I’ve always said that if my teenaged son were to suddenly find himself a father-to-be (and yes, it happens in any family, not just in certain families), I would want the mother-to-be to move in with us so that we can work together to bring up the baby. Obviously it’s a model that requires compromise, but it’s one that worked for much longer than our current nuclear family (or some version thereof) that we currently see as ideal.
I’m a few days behind, but couldn’t resist posting to this! As a single parent,I have adopted a child that was deemed “unadoptable” by the state of Washington. In turn I have basically adopted his birth parents as well, since they both have severe mental delays. There are several Indian tribes in our state that require a family to adopt the mother of a child with special needs as well as the child. They feel it helps keep the child connected and can prevent a lot of difficulties as the family grows. Especially in cases with prenatal alcohol and drug use. There are videos out to help teach the child that what happened before the child was born was NOT because the mom/dad didn’t love the child, but was due to other issues.
Sorry, I could go on for quite a while on this subject. It is one that is close to my heart. Thanks for drawing attention to this poor girl and her child. The mother has a difficult road ahead of her, regardless of the choice she makes (or has made for her).
I’ve a feeling it’s just because people see babies as cute and cuddly whereas the mother may not be and has no “voice”. There’s a similar issue I raised recently because of the case of a missing girl that just isn’t attracting the public’s attention in the same way as Maddy McCann did almost a year ago, for a variety of reasons that seem unacceptable to me. Shannon Matthews is every bit as important as Maddy but the response is just not the same. How many children just aren’t seen through no fault of their own?
Good one on child adoption. Read to know more on its trend: http://matrimonyxpress.bharatmatrimony.com/2008/03/couples/relationship-the-child-of-your-heart/
Post new comment