
Photo by Flickr user pizzodisevo. Used under a Creative Commons license.
Dacia Ray of Waking Vixen lands hard on a recent study that seems totally trapped in status quo assumptions.
There’s a new study that’s just been released that is reporting the above fact: 43% of American women have some kind of sexual dysfunction (SD).
...
With a percentage number that high, I want to know – dysfunctional compared to what? Compared to the rapid moan and groan of porn performers, the persistent cultural belief that orgasm from intercourse is ideal, or less concrete examples of the pressure that is exerted on women to conform to an ideal of sexual performance that is imagined?
I mean… what exactly are the assumptions in that study? This kind of thing is one of, my perpetual, and bugaboos. If we simply changed the definition of “sex” from “till he’s done” to “till she’s done” then if we changed nothing else then overnight bookstore self-help shelves would empty of books about “foreplay” and the “hard time” women have with orgasms to be restocked with of equally urgent and baffled books about men’s dysfunctional “prematurity.”
Of course that too would be looking at only half the picture but… it really would be nice to begin conversations that don’t assume men in general and ejaculation in particular is the be all and, especially the end all of sex. The benefits of pulling up that particular anchor could be pretty big. For all involved.
I’m guessing you meant to say “conclusion other than dysfunctional”.
And I wouldn’t draw any particular conclusions without knowing more. Dysfunctional is an awfully broad word. Let’s say, if 40% of women couldn’t achieve an orgasm at all, and this were a fairly recent phenomena or one limited only to certain societies, then I would say that it’s still dysfunctional even though it’s perfectly normal in the statistical sense.
Note: I’m not saying that I think that’s true, I just made it up on the spot. I’m just saying that I don’t know enough to draw any relevant conclusions from this and I suspect most other people don’t either.
I tend to agree with Nightfall. If we consider the inhabitants of Sudan, well, perhaps an 80% are poor. Probably most wouldn’t like being called that, and especially since it would appear as the norm in their country, but that doesn’t change the issue – they’re poor.
But of course, all depends on how this study was carried out. From what’s in Waking Vixen’s blog, it appears they asked a group of women their feelings about their sexual life. Doesn’t seem to imply especially biased assumptions.
The assumptions that you denounce might just be, unhappily, in the women’s minds, if their feelings about their sexuality led to such a high percentage. (And we sure need you and others like you to help unroot them.)
(Sorry for the long ramble.)
Post new comment