Susan Boyle and 21st Century Incarnations of the Gong Show

Sat, 2009-04-18 21:06

Warning: Curmudgeon alert

So someone finally showed me the Susan Boyle video that’s been making the rounds lately. She’s a 47-year-old Scotswoman, a choirist, who wound up on one of those mean-people “talent show” programs that are so popular these days. You know, the ones where instead of risking having the bad taste to enjoy a performer’s actual performance they show cool people’s faces during the performance so you can tell if you’re making the right choice? Oh, and to make sure you aren’t confused they mug horribly if they don’t think you should like a performer, and smile and gently shake their heads as if in wonder so you’ll know you should like the performer too.

Anyway, Boyle’s got the sort of great, room-filling voice that’s prized by show-tune impresarios, opera conductors, and choir directors. She’s also not beautiful the same way people who are paid to look cool on TV are beautiful.

And so everybody mugged awfully when she walked out on stage, and mugged worse when she said she wanted to sing a love-affirming song. And then she began singing and was really good so all the cool people stopped mugging and started smiling and gently shaking their heads. The live audience was so impressed by the switch to smiling and head-shaking that they all stood up and started cheering.

After the performance the smiling head-shakers said a bunch of condescending bullshit.

Anyway, since I hadn’t seen it I hadn’t registered any of the previous online commentary, but Ann Bartow of Feminist Law Professors sums the whole thing up rather nicely. Here’s a snippet.

When Simon tells Susan Boyle she is a “little tiger” I really wanted to throw up. She rolls it off with a lot of equanimity and class. The only thing that makes watching the portions of the video clip in which the judges are speaking tolerable to me is the utter joy the entire experience seems to bring to Susan Boyle.

She said it here.

There was a program in the 1970s called the Gong Show. It too was a talent show with a panel of judges. One difference was the judges weren’t paid to be cool. Another difference was that the judges had buttons on their desks that would ring a big gong that signaled that they were rejecting the performance or…

...the performer.

Which is what I thought about when I saw the program staffer’s reactions before, during, and after Susan Boyle’s performance.

Perhaps not surprisingly I couldn’t find the exact clip from the Gong Show I was looking for. The one that reminded me so closely of the “cool people’s” performance as Boyle sang.

Instead, here’s a clip of the same performer from an episode several months after the first. The intro by the host is significant. “Right now let’s bring back a terrific lady…”

Her name is Bobby Tremain.

The reason I couldn’t find the first clip, and why I’m not surprised, is that the first time ‘round one… or maybe more than one of the judges let her get about one verse into the song… maybe as far as when she started playing and tap dancing, and they rang the gong.

Why? I don’t remember who the nobody daytime “celebrities” were back then (anymore than I’ve heard of the daytime celebrities hired to be judgmental about Susan Boyle) but the one who stands out in my memory had Paul-Linde-fey kind schtick and he explained that he rang the gong because “that poor woman, that poor little old lady, I didn’t want her to die up there!”

There was much chittering, not all of it enthusiastic, from the audience. The host’s plastic smile never faded. Ms. Tremain was pretty speechless but clearly disappointed.

There was considerable outcry from the non-studio audience, however, and so they had her back. And let her finish. Three years later Tremain one the over-eighty tournament on another game show, Tic-tac Dough.

I bring all this up because Tremain, like Boyle, was talented, energetic, and enthusiastic. And like Boyle she didn’t fit the stereotypes of the judges who, in both instances, made their judgments based their preconceptions that people who look like X should be expected to do only Y.

I’m not ashamed for having watched The Gong Show because I was a very young and the two broadcast-only alternatives were worse. There are many more channels today, and many more choices of programming. I would be ashamed if today I watched whatever program it is that Boyle transcended. For one thing I’m a big boy now. For another I have my own sense of taste. For another, having been an amateur performing musician and singer I appreciate how much work goes into even the least praiseworthy performance. And so I have no patience for trained monkeys paid to mug or gently smile and shake their heads based on their preconceptions, their prejudices, and possibly anticipation of bananas from their producers after the show. I have to say I might watch the show if they had gong buttons on their desks like the old show… it would be amusing to watch the cool people try and master the technology to push them.

%@#*&!!!

Submitted by 2864 (not verified) on Sat, 2009-04-18 23:50.

Er, actually, they do. Check out the other clips from britainssotalented.

Submitted by 2864 (not verified) on Sun, 2009-04-19 04:33.

Fairly appropriate reCaptcha words: "stupor York"

**rings the gong for you identifying as "curmudgeon"** ;-)

Simon Cowell, the head honcho head-shaker/mugger, is credited with having created one of the big manufactured singing groups of the 1990s (I forget which one, it may have been the Spice Girls). For that reason alone he is believed by many to know talent when he sees it (a questionable conclusion to draw, to say the least!) and as a result he has been a judge on several of these shows in the past decade or so.

During which time he has time and again proved himself a JERK.

So, I don't see it as curmudgeonly to take a dim view of this type of show in general, and in particular of the way in which Susan Boyle was received.

Submitted by 2864 (not verified) on Sun, 2009-04-19 06:11.

figleaf,

You're not curmudgeonly at all. I used to watch the gong show too, but it seemed more innocent then than American Idol or Britain's Got Talent are. I cannot watch the latter shows because of their blatant glee at embarrassing those who attempt to showcase their talents (and I'm not convinced it's not all contrived to begin with). It kind of reminds me of a Roman circus where they had to perform or face wrath of some kind, usually being eaten by animals. Lions/Cowell, what's the difference? Bread and circuses folks. Besides also the feminist grievances I have over the Susan Boyle phenomenon and reaction to it on the internet, am I the only one who thinks that she has a good voice but it's not as monumental as some have come to extol? It's a natural talent, sure, but many, many people have similar talent. Now that's curmudgeonly (or whatever the female equivalent is)!

[Hi MOI! I think I must have only hinted at it but yes, Boyle's voice is of course wonderful but *only* wonderful, not "stand up and roar approval after the opening stanza" amazing. That was just more condescension... an opportunity for "magnanimity" that might not have been extended had she chosen to sing an operatic or choral piece where her build and stature would have better fit the stereotypes. Thanks! --fl]

Submitted by 2864 (not verified) on Sun, 2009-04-19 07:01.

I watched the video and now I am really angry. Susan Boyle was amazing and I am really happy for her that she had a chance to sing, but I am so angry at the way the audience was mocking her, the way those asshole judges were smirking. I hate that show and I never watch it. What a bunch of morons. I guess though that by the time the performance was finished everyone saw how wrong they were and maybe they will think a little before leaping to such conclusions. How dumb to think that there is a correlation between physical appearance and the sound of a person's voice. Duh.

Submitted by 2864 (not verified) on Sun, 2009-04-19 12:56.

Here we see two of the fundamental rules of shallow, condescending sexism at work:

1. As a woman, it's your job to be young, pretty and hot, always. If you are unable to fulfill this obligation, you are to disappear, immediately. If you fail or refuse to disappear fully enough you will be punished. This punishment will consist of being ignored and/or mercilessly mocked. Possibly even assaulted.

2. Women who are "old", "ugly" or "fat" are also by necessity stupid and delusional. They don't have any more sense than to think that it's okay for them to appear in public being old, fat and ugly. It's therefore important for people to call them names and show disgust at the sight of them, so as to beat them back into their place, which is....somewhere over there, where they won't be blocking our view of the young, pretty and hot.

I mean, honestly, who thinks that anyone, at 47 years old, is going to just wake up one day thinking that she can sing? I finally saw the video. I also avoid those shows and "reality" TV in general like a a leaky sewer. The whole segment seems suspiciously staged. Why would they have spent so much time on her before her performance if they weren't setting you up to be "shocked"?

Just more of that weak, transparent maneuver employed by TV shows and magazine cover editors: "We'll pretend that this is shocking so that you'll be shocked when you see/read it, and it will look as if we've actually told/showed you something that most adults aren't already aware of."

I have to admit to not understanding the people who say that they've watched Ms. Boyle's performance over and over and over and that it just "blew me away" and "made me cry!" (I enjoyed hearing her, but I simultaneously hated the monotonous, goopy romanticism of that song and couldn't wait for it to be over.)

Have the people who are so astonished that she could sing like that *never* seen a choir? Even on TV? They are frequently full of people who look very much like Ms. Boyle. And the faculty members in the vocal program at the college of fine arts at your local university do not resemble Shakira or Beyonce, I'm pretty sure. How is it possible that they not only can sing, but can teach others who aspire to do it professionally?!

So, really, I'm just re-saying exactly what you said. How do people get past the age of 4 and still cling to these ideas that "These things always look this way" and "Only these people can do this"?

["Have the people who are so astonished that she could sing like that *never* seen a choir?" Bingo! I won't say choirs are full of people who look like Boyle, but they're certainly full of a much more representative cross-section of humanity than do television panelists or fashion magazines. Thanks, Tlt. --fl]

User login