Not Unusual to Feel Standoffish About Handjobs

Thu, 2009-08-27 17:54

Abby Spector, guest-posting forEm & Lo says

I consider myself a sexual adventurer. As a bisexual who has posed naked for photographers, enjoys threesomes, and has a collection of vibrators, I think I deserve the label. However, there is one sexual act I refuse to partake in: handjobs.

For years I struggled trying to perfect my phallus-massaging abilities. Touching peen is only the first foot on third base (with oral being a whole body slide). We are taught that we have to run the diamond in base order. No skipping allowed. Five bruised penises later, I have learned how to stand up for myself. I look men in all three of their eyes and tell them the truth. “I, Abby Spector, will never give you a handjob.”

She said it here.

Here’s my take on handjobs. (Which in places, except for the bruising part, echos some of Spector’s points.)

I sort of held off waiting to hear other people’s comments before leaving my own. But based on what’s been said so far I think the big surprise ought to be where people (who haven’t tried it) ever got the idea handjobs for men are easy. And please don’t worry about it or feel dumb for not knowing — you’re so not the only one it’s not funny.

I think it’s sort of a natural mistake. Very young men can be pretty quick to ejaculate, and unless I’m really mistaken handjobs are most common really early in sexual relationship formation. Conversely handjobs fall out of favor pretty quickly once men, and their partners, begin to add penetrative acts to their repertoire. Add in the mistaken observation that if he can rub one out in a minute or two then it ought to be easy for her. (Most men, if you think about it, take months and even years to figure out how to do it the first time too!)

Yes, there are men for whom handjobs are easy and rewarding, and there are women for whom it comes naturally. But out of all the times I’ve had sex with partners I can think of only one or two times that someone managed to find the right spots, and the right rhythms, and had the interest, and the stamina, to get me all the way off — and not just warm me up — with just her hands.

That said, if you’ve actually been bruising your partners trying to get them off here’s a tip: Back off! There are some (not most) kinksters that might work for but even though almost all men like firmer pressure than most women would, but if you’re being rough enough to leave marks you’re also being way too rough to get him off. Point being “try harder next time” is not the solution to every problem!

Submitted by 3163 (not verified) on Thu, 2009-08-27 18:44.

Um...actually...maybe my partners have all just had an easy time reaching climax that way, but I've had a pretty successful track record with giving handjobs.

Submitted by 3163 (not verified) on Thu, 2009-08-27 20:10.

Funny, I was just thinking about this the other day. People sort of end up with a highly specialised technique for wanking, and it's not so easy for someone else to replicate it. Even with direction, it's difficult to get exactly the right rhythm, pressure etc. A handjob from someone else will probably never feel quite as good as a handjob from yourself.

I tend to use handjobs as a warmup. They are great for teasing, not so great for climax.

Submitted by 3163 (not verified) on Thu, 2009-08-27 21:21.

I'm with Tor. Hands are really wonderful *combined* with other ways of slurping and rubbing and stroking. But it's hard for me to get a partner off with my hands alone - or at least it has been since my early 20s. (Figleaf, you've got a very good point about very young men!) I've never taken it badly, because my partners have rarely gotten the right pressure, friction, pace, and timing for *me* with their hands alone. Somehow, lots of rubber-knee orgasms occurred anyway.

All of which is a great reason to work *together* if one person wants to be stroked to an orgasm by hands alone. Four hands are way more fun than two! It's also why I'm glad to have a few other charms and wiles. Slick lips (take your pick which ones) also mix very nicely with a pair of hands - or two.

Submitted by 3163 (not verified) on Thu, 2009-08-27 22:50.

I've always found it helpful to think of it as a form of massage. Not necessarily in technique but in mindset--sex is goal-directed and there's performance pressure, massage is simply relaxing. And if I'm not thinking "gotta make him come" but "make him feel good, I don't care if he comes" it turns out that most guys not only come but do it a lot faster than if I'm trying to drive him toward the finish line.

And if the reverse psychology doesn't work, if he doesn't come, he's still going to have a far better time than if I had been desperately trying to rev him up into the short strokes.

Submitted by 3163 (not verified) on Fri, 2009-08-28 04:37.

fair point, well made, as usual! my last partner *loved* handjobs, and it was easy to get him off that way, especially (ahem) in public places.
With my current boyfriend, he likes if I do, but it takes so much more work/arm strength that it's a lot more fun for me to switch to something else after a while. I've also noticed that my small hands are not an asset for handjobs on larger guys, and their large hands are not an asset when it comes to returning the favour. like everything in life, it varies...

Submitted by 3163 (not verified) on Fri, 2009-08-28 15:35.

Very young men can be pretty quick to ejaculate, and unless I'm really mistaken handjobs are most common really early in sexual relationship formation. Conversely handjobs fall out of favor pretty quickly once men, and their partners, begin to add penetrative acts to their repertoire.

Whoops.

I checked with my partner after showing him this post... and he is satisfied with what we have going on with the handjobs. Of course it probably helps that I "Check in" with him while I'm actually giving a handjob. No point doing something that's not doing anything for at least one (but preferably both) of us.

Apparently I should take my rings off while I'm doing it though, oops.

Submitted by 3163 (not verified) on Fri, 2009-08-28 19:32.

I second what Holly said. I pretty much never go into it thinking "I'm going to give him a handjob." I just touch, mostly to tease and warm up and have fun, (and I usually lick a bit here and there. It's too hard to resist!) and
I just get really into making him feel good. Sometimes it's just a prelude to other things, but sometimes it ends up being a handjob, without too much effort on my part. It's all about enjoying the journey and not worrying too much about the destination. (plus that means that if getting him off with your hands isn't working out, there's no pressure to stop you switching to something else)

Yeah, so pretty much exactly what Holly said. Plus I like all the little gasps and moans and faces that happen when I'm focusing on making him feel good instead of on making him come. Those are the point.

User login