Just a tip of the hat to Consumer’s Union, the publishers of Consumer Reports. Like a number of other folks who blog about relationships and sex I got advance notice that CR will have a review of condoms in their November issue.
I should say they’ll have another review. Which they’ve been doing on and off for years. Going back to the days when condoms weren’t just controversial but weren’t cool either. Or particularly safe or reliable. They got a lot of heat for it then. I had very personal reasons to be grateful then, though. And we all have good reason to be grateful now.
Not least because straight-up, no-nonsense, business-as-usual reviews that forswore the standard knee-squeezing and tittering and asked fundamental questions actual consumers wanted to know. Questions like do they work? Do they leak? Are they durable? Are they affordable? And are those stupid glow-in-the-dark kinds anything but a risky stunt?
The short answer, by the way is an overall yes, while some are less reliable than others condoms made today are safe and effective if used properly!!! Which is more than you could say years ago.
Good for them.
Quick note: for those of us familiar with ad-revenue-driven sites, and venture-capital-financed sites it’s a bit irksome that Consumer Reports puts its reports behind a for-pay firewall. However unlike pretty much all aforementioned sites Consumers Union accepts no advertising, accepts no venture financing and, as far as I know, accepts no other kind of grants or funding that would compromise either their mission or their integrity. For that reason you’ll have to pay to see their condom reviews online, or find the magazine on the shelf of a store or library. But you know what? In this case you really do get what you pay for, and, in this case I think that’s worth a lot.
They do have a blog, though, and like all good blogs it’s free. Here’s their post on their condom article.
Seven of the 20 models we tested earned a perfect score, indicating they were not only stronger and more reliable than most, but also had no leaks or flaws in their packaging. Those top seven include one Durex, two Lifestyles, and four Trojan models (Ratings available to subscribers). Alas, one of the more playful condoms we tested, the Night Light glow-in-the-dark model, didn’t fare as well, earning our lowest score for strength and exceeding the allowable number of samples with holes. But it did live up to its name on the glow front.
I gotta say I love that they confirmed that, as advertised, at least the glow-in-the-dark condom actually glows in the dark.




I remember when I was little,
Submitted by Ozymandias (not verified) on Fri, 2009-11-13 13:48.I remember when I was little, getting the new Consumer Reports magazine was a highlight of my month. I liked the cars and the page of ‘stupid advertisements’ in the back.
...Shit, I was a nerdy little kid.
Yes, the Republicans don’t
Submitted by Britney Bennett (not verified) on Fri, 2009-11-13 14:51.Yes, the Republicans don’t want anyone to know about condoms. They want people to have unprotected sex. And then they want the women to get pregnant, all so they can call them whores when they then decide they want/need an abortion.
I subscribe to CR online, I’m
Submitted by Hubman (not verified) on Fri, 2009-11-13 15:21.I subscribe to CR online, I’m gonna have to check that out! Especially the glow-in-the-dark condom test..
A point of information: in
Submitted by SnowdropExplodes (not verified) on Sat, 2009-11-14 05:55.A point of information: in the UK novelty condoms like glow-in-the-dark condoms are required by law to carry a warning “not intended for contraceptive use”.
I picked up some glow in the
Submitted by Lush (not verified) on Sat, 2009-11-14 13:34.I picked up some glow in the darks the other day. Before use you have to hold them up to the light for 30 seconds. Which probably leads to the condom drying out and being at greater risk of tearing.
It was also really strange… the alien abduction/cyborg sex feel I was hoping for was more just comical and clown like… think light saber on your dong.
I don’t recommend them for the above reasons.
~Lush