Julie Bindel, writing in The Guardian has a number of interesting points about a research project she participated in by interviewing men who volunteered and/or otherwise agreed to discuss being customers of prostitutes.
The most interesting point in her article, by far?
One of the most interesting findings was that many believed men would “need” to rape if they could not pay for sex on demand. One told me, “Sometimes you might rape someone: you can go to a prostitute instead.” Another put it like this: “A desperate man who wants sex so bad, he needs sex to be relieved. He might rape.” I concluded from this that it’s not feminists such as Andrea Dworkin and myself who are responsible for the idea that all men are potential rapists – it’s sometimes men themselves.
One really, seriously cool thing about Bindel’s article? She links to an ungated copy of the research report(pdf)! That’s very cool.
One reason it’s cool is that if you read the report you can see stuff like, oh, say, who the co-authors and sponsors of the study were. And one of whom was the not always exactly correct activist Catharine A. MacKinnon. Which lets you know to pick up a grain of salt while reading.
Skepticism notwithstanding, while there’s a distinct possibility that the quotes were cherry-picked there’s no reason on earth to doubt they found men who actually said those things.
Not least because it’s close to conventional wisdom: lots, and lots, and lots of people believe men are such borderline-criminal, verging-on-rapist, impulse-control-of-a-three-year-old-child animals.
Oddly, as Bindel points out, a demoralizing number of men believe it.
Lest one leap to accuse contemporary feminists for spreading that belief I’ll just point out the idea substantially predates contemporary feminism, which only really cropped up in the late 1960s. Whereas the idea that prostitution prevents rape was already current in the 1360!
Anyway, Bindel’s quotes nicely illustrate that whatever minor problems feminism might have with men it’s usually nothing compared to the abiding misandry of non-feminists and anti-feminists.
(Clue: Of course most men are actually perfectly capable of controlling their urges. Hello! Masturbation?)
Quick response to last entry, which doesn’t have a posting option: [sarcasm] Suuure they could just masturbate. When, you know, masturbation was largely considered immoral and unhealthy until the 1980s. [/sarcasm]
One of the quoted comments of the men interviewed by the study was: “Prostitution is a last resort to unfulfilled sexual desires. Rape would be less safe, or if you’re forced to hurt someone or if you’re so frustrated you jack off all day.”
Which kind of implies that some of them see masturbation as being just as taboo as rape. A ridiculous sentiment, but unfortunately masturbation is still taboo so there is still pressure not to do it – although elsewhere in the report it’s indicated that the pressure is the same as that not to buy sexual services.
[Boy, funny you should mention that, SE. While digging around looking for church doctrine on prostitution and rape the other day I stumbled across an old-church assertion that rape really is a lesser crime than masturbation. I think it was Augustine or Aquinas to said it. Go figure! —fl]
I once had to read this pro-American slavery piece on how slavery was necessary to keep prostitutes from uglying up the streets in the South. Since there was an endless supply of black slave women to rape, there was no need for demoralizing, unsightly whores in the South, and without slavery, the South would be just as immoral as the North, with whores on every corner.
Yyyyeah.
[Umm… yeah, I’m with you on that. While its perfectly true that, contra all those racist “which way to the white women” fantasies, the vast, vast majority of mixed-race children were fathered by white men, it’s also the case that the vast majority of slaves were owned by a pretty small percent of the population. Nice try on their part to work in all those hot buttons though, eh? Great line about being more moral than the north! Um, yeah! Thanks, karak. —fl]
Post new comment