Feminists Calling Out Misandry When They See It

Kudos to Jessica Fischer at The Sexademic, Shelby Knox at Misogyny Watch, Jos at Feministing, and other feminist and feminist-leaning bloggers for calling out that stupid (and potentially triggering if you’ve got issues) Sex Really “men are assholes so make sure you use condoms” public service announcement.

If you’re having sex with the kind of men represented in that stupid PSA, and there’s not even anything wrong if that’s your decision, then yeah, you should probably insist on condoms. Just for starters. But you of all people probably know that.

But the implication that all men are like that is…

Well, it’s reinforcing the dominant “no-sex” class paradigm wherein not only are women disinterested in sex, at least for its own sake*, which I usually talk about more, but also the equally dominant notion that men are obligately, reflexively, thoughtlessly, incontinently, perpetually… and possibly exclusively sexual.

Actual feminists get that there’s more to men that that. Anti-feminist rape apologists and slut-shamers like Laura Sessions Stepp, who was involved with this PSA, don’t.

Inside the dominant paradigm all men must be that way — snakes, snails, and out of control giant hairless indiscriminately-wagging dog tails. Just as all women must be like the “girlfriend” character on the phone in the PSA — too wrapped up in wanting a baby to notice to care what her boyfriend thinks about sex. And, not to beat a dead horse, but if the thesis of the ad is “all men are irresponsible, inconsiderate sex-hungry assholes” then the message of the ad is that’s just what all women have to put up with, with all men… in which case using condoms is at best irrelevant and at worst counterproductive to the message that…

a) all men are obligate, reflexive, and sexual
b) all women don’t care because they just want babies and therefore
c) contrary to the surface “warning” to women the underlying message sent to both women and men don’t bother with condoms after all because men don’t like them and it just prolongs how often women have to have to endure icky old sex to get that baby.

Which, d) is pretty much the dominant paradigm folks like Stepp earnestly reinforce.

Never mind that even when men talk that way they tend to be considerably more attentive with their partners one-on-one. And never mind that women are directly interested in sex and not just its “innocent byproducts.”

Pay attention, instead, to the fact that the ad viciously stereotypes men and women, that it instructs men’s and women’s behavior by setting expectations for it. It’s instructing women that the only good thing they’ll ever get out of sex is babies. It instructs men that women really secretly do want unprotected sex, or at least don’t care if they do.

But anyway, why is it people keep getting away with saying it’s feminists that hate men?

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

 

I haven’t gotten a feed since Feb.16, has anything changed?

[Talk about perfect timing, Five! I just two minutes ago fixed a problem with the automatic newsfeed generator. (For instance Firefox is once again automatically finding it whereas it wasn’t before.) And yes, it looks like the problem dates back to at least mid-February. Anyway, you should start seeing updates again very soon. Please let me know. Thanks! —fl]

 

I am getting the updates now. Thanks

 

I don’t know if you saw this post at Bitch PhD, but after basically seconding the criticisms of the ad, M. Leblanc also talks about how men do and don’t talk about sex among themselves. Pretty long comment thread, a lot of it in her opinion not responsive to her main point, but I think interesting in its own right. (Yes, I’m in it.) Anyway, check it out, and I’d be interested in your take on her point if that’s an interesting subject for you.

[Ooh, very cool post and discussion. I’m actually sort of blown away! Almost speechless, really. The idea that men not talking about sex might be misogynist (i.e. you’d be telling people your girlfriend is a “whore” if you admitted she “did it” before marriage, for instance) just hadn’t occurred to me. It’s obvious from the comments that it’s a new idea for a lot of other people too. It certainly goes against a million expectations and that’s… cool. Thanks so much for the tip! Chingona! —fl]

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Post new comment

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.