Perspective: What if Sex Was Mundane But Exercise (or Visiting Our Parents, or Hot Soup, or Etc.) Was Taboo?

Sun, 2010-04-18 07:09

Quick followup on other day’s post It’s Not “Disloyal” To Say There Are Some Things That Feel Better Than Sex, which was about how a lot of pleasures are underrated because we overemphasize (without necessarily overrating) our enjoyment of sex.

If having sex was considered passé but exercise was taboo imagine the moral fulminations about shin splints or tennis elbow.

If having sex was considered passé but exercise was taboo imagine the contortions and excuses we’d make for each other over ice packs or hot wraps.

If having sex was considered passé but exercise was taboo imagine imagine people hurrying in and out of unmarked buildings with plain paper bags full of unbelievably-poorly-made running shoes or phthalates- and even PCB-contaminated exercise balls. And imagine zoning ordinances and community outrage meant to prevent (mafia-run!) “gyms” or “workout clubs” from proliferating.

If having sex was considered passé but exercise was taboo imagine “frank” and “edgy” “experts” arguing that sure, it’s ok as long as it’s in the privacy of your own home. But even most “experts” agreed that people should get most of their exercise “naturally” over the course of the day as when climbing stairs or opening jars.

If having sex was considered passé but exercise was taboo imagine how shocked our partners might be to catch us covertly misusing a Hitachi Magic Wand on their, ew, muscles!

Or, if you like, imagine what the consequences would be if it were instead enjoying hot foods and beverages when it’s cold outside or snuggling your children, or visiting your parents when you were an adult, or . (For instance think how certain parties could effortlessly shift gears to claiming that women’s “delicate constitutions” just couldn’t possibly take the risk of child-transmitted sniffles… while also railing volubly about how, say, measles vaccinations could never provide “complete” safety from all illness and so distributing it would just mislead people into imagining they could just touch children with impunity.)

Sex wouldn’t feel any less nice. Nor would exercise or hot soup be any more so. What I was thinking about in the previous post is how much more we’d appreciate (however guilty we might feel about it) that which is ordinary but socially frowned upon.

Hmm. Questions of taboo and

Submitted by Sungold (not verified) on Sun, 2010-04-18 09:06.

Hmm. Questions of taboo and stigma are tricky. Do we really enjoy sex more because it’s stigmatized? Myself, I tend to think shame tends to poison pleasure (and undermine both they way we see ourselves and the way we relate to our partners). On the other hand, lots of people get an extra frisson from sexual acts that we don’t feel our shameful but do seem a little bit “naughty.”

Oh dear, I’m still not saying it right I think. It’s not the taboo I’m talking about, it’s more about enjoying what we now dismiss a familiar pleasures. It’s hard I think because we make the other pleasures mundane, not that we make sex special. Thanks, Sungold

Globally, though, I think taboos are more likely to evoke shame than amplify pleasure. Just think of all the wonderful oral sex people have missed out on – for centuries! – because it was considered shameful and sinful. And so I’m disinclined to think that taboos increase our appreciation of sex.

These are really separate issues than those you raised in your previous post.

It’s a fun thought experiment, though. And I, frankly, am shocked – shocked! – that anyone would use a Hitachi on their muscles! (That one made me sputter my otherwise perfectly delicious coffee.)

Two extremely anti-erotic captchas: Haldeman antietam – Watergate and war don’t do it for me!

Quite possibly. I don’t know

Submitted by Rachel @ The Sex Myth (not verified) on Sun, 2010-04-18 20:59.

Quite possibly. I don’t know know if you’re familiar with Michel Foucault’s The History of Sexuality but this is one of the key arguments that he (and other social constructionist types, such as Gagnon and Simon) makes: that the “repression” of sex serves not to silence it, but rather to make it an object of obsession, and that this obsession has a social/cultural/political purpose.

What’s really getting me down

Submitted by Holly Pervocracy (not verified) on Mon, 2010-04-19 10:15.

What’s really getting me down is the thought that if exercise was taboo, big muscles and low bodyfat would still be in fashion, you’d just have to pretend they just naturally happened that way and never mention the implications.

You might be interested in

Submitted by Tiara the Merch Girl (not verified) on Fri, 2010-04-23 17:18.

You might be interested in the story The Taboo of Oobat – the central conceit is that sex is normal but eating/showing your mouth is taboo:
http://www.richpasco.org/oobat/

User login