So a couple of years ago I ran into a neighbor when I was taking a bus downtown for a tech seminar. I knew she worked for the local university alumni office fundraising department so I asked what her current project was. She said she was researching “the giving habits of those who donate $250,000,000.00 or more.” She said it was… different.
I was reminded of this when Bridget Crawford of Feminist Law Professors mentioned serious but very difficult to address issue
Earlier this week the Chronicle of Higher Education ran an article called “The Wrong Type of Solicitation” about the sexual harassment of higher education planned-giving personnel.
“Sexual harassment can occur in any job, but certain aspects of fund raising make it more likely. For one thing, women now dominate the profession. Three-fourths of the 30,000 members of the Association of Fundraising Professionals are female.
In many cases, those women are appealing to older, powerful men for large donations. To succeed, fund raisers must build long-term relationships with donors. And they often visit donors in their homes or meet them in social settings where alcohol and personal information are plentiful.”
The impression my friend gave me is that the fraction-of-a-billion-dollar donors rarely involve themselves directly with fundraising staff. But there are plenty of others who may be willing and able to play bullshit/bullying games that go beyond asking to have buildings or departments named after them. And there are very, very few fundraisers who’s agencies are in a position to decline a donor who’s being an asshole, let alone out them.




i actually feel silly for
Submitted by danimo (not verified) on Sun, 2010-07-18 10:25.i actually feel silly for never having thought about this before. it makes a lot of sense, though, and is definitely a complicated issue. i mean, things become a lot less complicated if you remove capitalism and money in general from the picture, and it seems very selfish not to do so indeed, but unfortunately institutions of higher learning need funding to do all of the amazing, multi-faceted human educating they do.
i suppose one solution would be for fundraising departments to offer their employees a genuinely safe place to voice their concerns with the utmost confidentiality and to, as discreetly as possible, replace those who are being harassed with different employees without punishment.
This is offtopic, (sorry
Submitted by Lulu (not verified) on Mon, 2010-07-19 09:23.This is offtopic, (sorry about that). Figleaf, I just wanted to let you know that your RSS feed seems to be outputting two copies of every blog posted. I’ve been seeing this for about two weeks.
Hi Lulu, I’m trying to
Submitted by figleaf on Mon, 2010-07-19 11:24.Hi Lulu,
I’m trying to figure out why this is happening for some newsreaders. When I look directly at my RSS feed output it’s only generating one entry per post. For some reason they’re showing up as duplicates in Google Reader. Or more accurately they’ve started showing up as duplicates — the output algorithm in my server hasn’t changed for months.
I’ll bump up the priority on that. Thanks for the heads’ up.
fl
Ouch. Knowing a bit about
Submitted by sapioslut (not verified) on Mon, 2010-07-19 10:26.Ouch. Knowing a bit about higher learning environments it would depend on the institution. The ones I am familiar with would, officially, not have any issues with dealing with this type of behaviour; sexual ethics are a ‘given’. However on reading your post it reminds me of a couple of developments that smack of the same discord (though the instances I am aware of it was not sexual) but it makes me wonder what I’m not aware of.