On Intent vs Interpretation, Conjunctions, and Gender Construction: Pre-Coffee Rumination on Billy Joel's "Always a Woman to Me"

I'm in the northern Virginia suburbs of Washington D.C. this week arranging convalescence and rehab for my mom. There's no coffee pot in my mom's apartment. The nearest coffee shop is a strip-mall Starbucks so they play piped-in music instead of whatever is on the barista's iPod. And at least this morning they were playing Billy Joel's treacly "Always a Woman."

Before I'd had any coffee at all.

And therefore before I had any psychic defenses.

And so the lyrics seemed a little fuzzy but the conventional interpretation poured straight into my ear.

She will take all your money and show you the door,
Just like A-a-ava Gardner and Zha Zha Gabor,
She'll admire your Mercedes then ask for the key,
She'll say "not tonight"
But she's always a woman to meeeee.

Or something like that... I dunno, those might not be the real lyrics but they still sound like howling misogyny.

And I thought to myself "Seriously?"

And I thought to myself "But she's always a woman to me?"

And I thought, I dunno.  Each verse is a recitation gender-constructing clichés: "She can kill with a smile / She can wound with her eyes / She can ruin your faith with her casual lies / And she only reveals what she wants you to see / She hides like a child..." and then theres that peculiar tagline "BUT she's always a woman to me"

Seriously?

The word "but" tends to imply a negation or contradiction but whatever the real verses the lyrics always boil down to Joel saying that on the one hand the subject of the song is a manifestation of the "whore" side of the madonna/whore binary but on the other hand.... she's a knowable madonna/whore to him. Or he doesn't mind. Or he knows how to handle her.

Boil down the gendered cues Joel uses in the song and you get, basically, "she's always a woman but she's always a woman." Where, I guess, that "but" maybe just adds to the "mystery that is woman?"

I dunno. I hadn't had any coffee yet.

The melodic earworm was still lodged in my head when I got back to my laptop so I looked up the lyrics and learned that at least in folklore Joel wrote the song about his very savvy MBA wife, Elizabeth, and the ruthless way she negotiated on his behalf to get his contracts in order after he'd been basically manipulated into signing away the rights and proceeds of all his earliest hits.

Sounds plausible. It's very interesting if true. And a nice acceleration from zero to about 55 for Joel on my not-a-troglodyte-after-all speedometer.

But if it's true it doesn't appear to be well known.  To find that explanation I still had to dig through piles of interpretations by others who are simply entranced by the essential romance and eternal mystery of femininity. And/or a sufficiently manly man's ability to cuckold see through the facades and leave her powerless.

So even assuming Joel was playing with the tropes instead of writing paeans to them, it still doesn't explain what the Sam Hill that "but" is doing in what appears to be a pretty enduring definition of what it is to be a woman according to the audience that made and keeps the song so popular.

I dunno.

The coffee's finished soaking in, my hair's dry after my shower, and I gotta get going here.

If nothing else what other song can I hum to get this dang tune out of my head!

"La la la dee dee daa, la la la dee dee dum, la dee da dum dum dum, but she's always a woman to meee."

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa


Tags:

I'd always thought of it more

Submitted by Cindy (not verified) on Fri, 2012-03-30 10:08.

I'd always thought of it more as a simple contrast to the description in the first half of the last line of the verse--like, "She hides like a child--but, still, she's not a child, she's a woman."  I just assumed that verse was written first, and then thereafter he had to keep the "but" in there to maintain the form, or something.

I like your non-troglodytic interpretation better. :)

Sometimes I'm thankful for my

Submitted by Irene (not verified) on Fri, 2012-03-30 15:55.

Sometimes I'm thankful for my general inability to hear/remember lyrics of songs I've never seen written down. I've heard that song millions of times and wouldn't have been able to quote anything but "she's always a woman to me," which frankly it sounds as though he's singing tenderly. I did have an idea I probably wouldn't much like that song if I listened to it closer, though ...

For a much better song about a relationship that has its problems, I recommend Leonard Cohen's Tonight Will Be Fine, at least in the minimal, poignant performance here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e5MUdNyaYoo. You do kind of wonder whether the woman in that sees the relationship in the same way as the speaker, but it's clearly not impossible that she does.

Been thinking of you and your mom, and wishing for the best for you and your family.

english is my third language,

Submitted by Anonymous (not verified) on Sat, 2012-03-31 11:58.

english is my third language, so after the first few sentences, I supposed that you are helping your mom to come off coffe, which is a very addictive substance indeed. You have helped her throw out the coffe, and were happy to know that the place she could get her nearest fix is quite far away, and also has bad music.

 

I hope you don't get it in the wrong way, this is not meant to be mean to anyone and especially your mother whom I wish to get better soon, I just wanted to sheer the absurd humor of it.

I kind of adore the song

Submitted by Diatryma (not verified) on Sat, 2012-03-31 17:47.

I kind of adore the song because of that contrast-- she will ruin YOUR faith, but she's always a woman to ME.  It seems to me to be about the contrast between the two situations, the two audiences.

One of my college roommates

Submitted by Lynn Gazis-Sax (not verified) on Mon, 2012-04-02 10:30.

One of my college roommates wrote a filk song based on this one, called "She's Always a Hacker to Me" (old style meaning of "hacker" as computer enthusiast, not new style meaning about breaking into systems). Here I am singing it:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K1rtFfilazU&list=UUUcG5hZlmvi1eI1GqNXJu7Q...

*clap* *clap* *clap*

Submitted by Irene (not verified) on Mon, 2012-04-02 10:49.

*clap* *clap* *clap* *giggle*

Oh, and like THAT'S going to take his earworm away! You are a cruel, cruel woman.

If nothing else what other

Submitted by Mark Z. (not verified) on Mon, 2012-04-02 16:20.

If nothing else what other song can I hum to get this dang tune out of my head!

I recommend the string riff from Led Zeppelin's "Kashmir".

I've always hated this song.

Submitted by Kathy (not verified) on Fri, 2012-04-06 07:01.

I've always hated this song.  I remember having a discussion with a friend of mine because she wanted it played at her wedding and I thought it was a horrible song.  To me it always boiled down to "Oh she can be pretty much any stereotype going as long as I can keep dating/sleeping with her."

The other one that makes me want to rage is "Wonderful Tonight" by Eric Clapton.  Guy has pretty but insecure girl for eye candy who then has to tend to him after he gets totally wasted at party... height of romantic wonder.

I guess I see both

Submitted by Clarence (not verified) on Sun, 2012-04-15 16:38.

I guess I see both sides.

I've never made up in my mind whether that song is a peon to female unaccountability or a warning with misogynist overtones. In short, I'm not sure if its "I don't care what she does, she's a woman and hence special!" , or if its " No matter what she might do to you, someone will always pedestalize her, so beware young man!".

User login