Rest in Peace Shulamith Firestone

Image via AtlanticWire. Cached as a bandwidth-conserving courtesy
Cropped image from TheAtlanticWire.com.

I was sorry to hear Shulamith Firestone, author in 1968 1970 of The Dialectic of Sex: The Case for Feminist Revolution, passed away late last week.

Her book is, I think, harder to read today than it was when it came out now nearly half a century ago. The world has really changed since then. Medical science, academia, feminism, and even mainstream, non-complete-wingnut conservative chauvinism(!!) have changed since then. And I think to at least some extent her book was responsible for some of that change.

Some of the things she said, though, still resonate like a bell. While I wasn't as taken by her "futurist" passages I learned a lot when, too late in life, I finally read the darn book.  I liked it, and her, a lot.  She hugely influenced how I wrote thereafter.

Update: By the way, when I said things have changed since 1970 (I mistakenly said Firestone's book came out in 1968) I obviously didn't mean everything's changed. But, especially considering it came out years before Roe vs. Wade was handed down, society was really, really different then. For one thing, unlike us, she didn't have 40+ years of radical, moderate, and progressive feminism to lean on. Instead she had nada. (In fact one of Firestone's widely-noticed "radical feminist" pieces was an answer to the "father of abortion rights" Bill Baird, who had opined that maybe someday actual women would become angry enough about limits on reproductive rights to become activists in what he largely considered to be his movement.) So. Yeah. We're not living in utiopia here in the 21st Century. But the world was radically different then.


Tags:

Nada? I wouldn't say that. I

Submitted by Irene (not verified) on Tue, 2012-09-04 20:50.

Nada? I wouldn't say that. I agree it was very different, but feminism of various stripes goes waaaaay back. Part of the problem is in fact how much one generation's feminism has been made invisible to the next, requiring much reinvention of wheels. (I need to read Firestone myself; I suspect there are some wheels in there I've probably missed.)

Incidentally, have you read any of Joanna Russ's nonfiction? I think you might really like some of her stuff. How to Suppress Women's Writing, for instance.

I haven't read Joanna Russ. 

Submitted by figleaf on Wed, 2012-09-05 10:01.

I haven't read Joanna Russ.  I hadn't known about her non-fiction.  I do know that she cited Firestone's futurism as inspiration for her own brand of science fiction.

Also I hope it didn't sound like I was implying there were no feminist radicals before Firestone and her circle(s) of activists.  I do remember she seemed to think a lot of earlier feminists were sellouts for deferring women's interests for voting rights for African-American men (the 19th Century) the labor movement (early 20th.)  She said it was still going on in the 1960s, and to a large extent it was.  But that's what I mean when I say the world was different then, and that she (and obviously other women who became active in that decade) did a lot to change it.  In other words I'm not saying she had no foundation, just that it was less modern and maybe less obvious than what we're used to today.

fl

I have not read the book, but

Submitted by Kitten (not verified) on Thu, 2012-09-06 06:29.

I have not read the book, but heard of it.
It was certainly a different time then and should make a fascinating read especially when put in context with the changes of now and then.

User login