Links

Cool Site: Gender Across Borders

Fri, 2011-10-28 16:47

Let me take a moment away from my chronic writer's block* to say that the large group blog Gender Across Borders - a global feminist blog kind of rocks.

Just today there have been posts about

It's just all-round interesting perspectives plus clarification of issues I didn't know I don't know enough about.  Even when I thought I did.

 

* About this writer's block?   I dunno.  I still usually draft several posts a day, get them about 95% finished, and still can't get myself to write a closing sentence and post them.  Back. Log.  City.  Month after month.  I can comment just fine on other people's blogs.  Just not here.  Sigh.

The Excellent (and Slightly Salty) Food Blogger Linda Miller Nicholoson on Dealing With Threats in Comments

Sat, 2011-09-17 07:14

The mildly naughty-leaning Seattle food blogger Linda Miller Nicholoson of Salty Seattle, who I just stumbled upon a day or two ago, wrote a very smart post about dealing with some kind of animal rights or possibly food-allergy troll who not only heaped the usual loads of invective on her but also threatened to both her and her child.

It's a pretty cool, level-headed post about the impact it had on her, how she located details about the commenter (including the street address associated with the originating computer's IP address) decision to go public with those details, and advice on where and how to report such computer-based threats to the appropriate local and federal authorities including a specific agency website set up for reporting not only online frauds and hacks but internet-based threats such as these.  (The Internet Crime Complaint Center.)

You should read the whole post both for context and specifics but I'd like to highlight what one of her commenters said

I got one of these comments as well (though not as troubling) with the email charles’dot’bollinger at gmail’dot’com. Both names sound similar to Charles, or Chuck.

Methinks this is that same trollish DocChuck that has been harrassing SteamyKitchen and Pioneer Woman for a long time. I know he DOES in fact live in Florida, and seems to search around for mentions of famous bloggers and attack the blogs that do the mentioning — it seems he might be googling the peanut butter pie phenomenon. Think of him as the Westboro Baptist Church of internet trolls :(

Source: Salty Seattle

This is what happens when you go public with your cyber demons -- you not only discover it's not just you, you also inform other targets that it's also not just them!

It's important to realize that no victim is ever obliged report or even publicize his or her troll's behavior.  And in fact most of the time folks deal by just moderating such comments or blocking the sender.  Although sometimes they also take down their blogs.*

But while it's ok to keep such threats quiet, by going public you can often multiply both the pressure on one's tormentor and provide solidarity and relief to other victims.  Who may in turn provide solidarity, relief, and solid suggestions, to you.

Anyway, I should also mention that Nicholoson's more typical fare, Gourmet orSaveur quality posts about food that range from philosophy to comfort to haute cuisine to molecular gastronomy, is pretty good reading.  And as a nominal sex blogger I appreciate her flip attitudes and sometimes very cute salacious analogies.  Definitely worth a look.

Update: I just noticed that Nicholoson is also the sponsor of what looks like an annual fundraiser/photography-contest site, NudieFoodies.  Again, mildly salacious while staying pretty safe for work.  Nicholoson's got the right attitude, incidentally -- for her own entry she made a bikini from marshmallow Peeps!

*For sad but obvious reasons this has been a common response among anonymous sex bloggers.  For even sadder reasons, at one time there was at least one fairly popular sex blogger who decided the best way to rise through the ranks was by smearing, stalking, and even threatening more popular competitors unless or until they dropped out!

Hats Off But Helmets On for Clarisse Thorn

| Tags:
Wed, 2011-08-24 11:53

In a post titled "So, I broke my neck," Clarisse Thorn says

That’s why I haven’t been around the Interwebs for a while. Because I broke my neck in a bicycle accident.

...

The only reason I survived this accident with nothing more than a fractured spine is because I was wearing a helmet. If I hadn’t been wearing a helmet, I would be dead right now. Wear a helmet!

Source: Clarisse Thorn

She says it doesn't look like there will be any neurological issues or paralysis but at the moment she's in a brace that's literally screwed into her skull.

This would be a good time to mention that I wish there was a good way to say "I'm sorry XYZ happened" that didn't at least peripherally imply a sense of responsibility for someone else's woes. Lacking that I'm just going to say I'm really sorry Clarisse was injured so badly and I'm glad that she wasn't more badly hurt.

I like Clarisse a lot, and as long as I've been reading her I've really valued her commitment, her perspective, and her insights into areas of gender and sexuality that have historically been swaddled in assumptions, stereotypes, myths, and sometimes deliberate untruths.

From the bottom of my heart I wish her a speedy and complete recovery.

And yeah, wear a helmet and if you've got loved ones do what you can to make sure they wear theirs.

It Would Have Gotten Even Better Had Rickman Himself Done it But It's Still Pretty Good

Tue, 2011-07-26 23:28

It's.

Very.

Funny.

But.

.

.

Still.

True.

It gets better.

Even for Snape.

I Love My New Old Neighborhood

Wed, 2011-05-25 21:30

So I'm walking home from the (almost) corner grocery store on our walkaround neighborhood mains street and I see this sandwich board in front of one the local art galleries.

Photo by figleaf (hey that's me!) Cached as a bandwidth-conserving courtesy
Photo by figleaf (hey that's me!) Used under a Creative Commons license.

I didn't see who was inside (I could tell the workshop was in progress and that's about all) but I'm pretty sure Teri Ciacchi of Living Love Revolution was leading it. Who knew?

When my friends first started moving to this neighborhood fifteen or twenty years ago the area was pretty decrepit.  Not trendy decrepit, just kind of dumpy.  Now while the economy's taken its toll a lot of the much older generation (<em>my</em> parents' age) that used to keep lackadasical shops full of antique knicknack and used furniture and second-hand audio gear and pensioner's bars have moved while people basically their grandchildren's age have been taking over.  Who knew?

Link: The Brunettes Blog - Two Siblings Write About Religion, Gender, Philosophy, and Sex

| Tags:
Mon, 2011-04-25 10:14

So I just stumbled across Jenny and Libby's The Brunettes Blog, subtitled "Two siblings write about religion, gender, philosophy, and sex." According to their "debut" post (which they actually wrote a couple of months after they began posting)

The Conversation: a beginning
August 14th, 2010

So my sister and I, after many years of writing and chatting about the subjects that most fascinate us, decided to finally get together and write a blog.

Source: The Brunettes Blog

The rest of the post is a dialog about what they care about and, more interestingly, how they care about them. It's not deep or insightful in itself but it is a nice window into their approach.

Anyway, they cover a lot of the same issues I do -- gender stereotypes, evolutionary psychology, men and desirability, and things like the difference between monogamy and fidelity. They talk a lot more about polyamory than I do, and they discuss religion more often as well -- mainly in the context of atheism. And finally, while they originally began blogging as sisters one of the two, Libby, now identifies as Lane William so now they blog as siblings. And blog about issues like gender dysphoria and acceptance. It's all good stuff.

Anyway, I don't usually blogroll people right away but I've enjoyed browsing their archives this morning.  You might too.

Wise Guys Reply: What Would You Think of a Woman Proposing?

Tue, 2011-04-05 12:25

Photo by Flickr user keithius. Cached as a bandwidth-conserving courtesy
Photo by Flickr user keithius. Used under a Creative Commons license.

Hey, I'm the Straight Married Guy this week in Em & Lo's Wise Guys column, answering the question "Would most men be cool with a woman proposing marriage to them? (assuming they’re in a serious committed relationship where marriage has become an unspoken expectation for both parties)."

I was pretty cool with it!

We’d been in a serious committed relationship for years, and I’d known almost right away that I wanted to marry her. The expectation had even gone from unspoken to spoken when her fairly conservative mom cornered us coming out of a hotel room together on a family trip and said, “So what’s the deal with you two?” We stammered a bit and my partner blurted out “But we’re going to get married.” And I nodded vigorously. Now, at the moment it wasn’t strictly true. We’d talked about it a lot but never made an actual decision. We talked about it later, a bit surprised that in our mid-thirties we were still making excuses. I think I said we should make it official. She said “Should we do it?” and I said yes. And we stopped being nervous staying in the same hotel room around her mom. But not until we really were married.

Anyway, while there seems to be a resurgence of “tradition” where people sometimes fly to special destinations just to pop the question and where guys are “formally” asking the bride’s fathers for their daughter’s “hand in marriage,” I think it’s also fine for women to pop the question instead. I also think that if a guy can’t handle being proposed to at the very least with grace and good humor, then he’d be kind of a brittle husband anyway.

Source: Em & Lo

Follow the link to check out answers from Gay Engaged Guy Joel Derfner (he's not so sure) and Straight Single Guy Tom Miller (he's fine with it and has a funny "regendered" take including wondering if she should first ask his mom for his hand.)

Early Sex Blogger Bacchus Explains Why He Doesn't Do More Science-of-Sex Blogging

Sun, 2011-03-06 14:46

Bacchus says (emphasis mine)

Way back in 2002 when I started this sex blog, I imagined that many of my posts might point to online news stories about sex. There weren’t so many sex blogs back then, and online writing about sex from “mainstream” journalists was still rare enough to be notable.

What I quickly discovered, though, was that these stories were generally crap, especially when they pretended, badly, to be based on “the latest research”. Scientists usually don’t do sex well, and reporters usually don’t do science well, so a reporter’s view of sex research usually turns out to be hideous insulting nonsense and tripe. (Exceptions do happen. But man, you gotta dig for ‘em.)

Source: ErosBlog

I think that's about right.

My personal ax to grind would be the egregious fees charged by "science journals" (actually a handful of closely held private republishers) to read usually-taxpayer-funded research results.  Reporters rarely have the $30-$50 per article to read anything more than the (usually hopelessly vague) abstract.  Which gives them even more opportunity to Rorschach and Rashomon the results to suit their own (and their editor's and their reader's) agendas, hangups, and predilections, not to mention their social expectations of what the "right" interpretation ought to be.  With sex even more than other matters.

Very frustrating.

Bacchus says see also How To Spot an Internet Sex Research Hoax by Jessi Fischer and Men: New Guest Contrib Thomas Roche Warns of Web Porn Induced Impotence at Tiny Nibbles. Good call.

Searched for Origin of "Coerced Paternity After Oral Sex" Story, Found Sherry Colb's Interesting FindLaw Blog Instead

Thu, 2011-02-24 18:03

So about a week ago Amanda Hess mentioned a peculiar paternity case that's making the rounds of the blogosphere lately... even though the case in question was decided back in 2005.

The saga of Dr. Richard Phillips and Dr. Sharon Irons continues: "Phillips accuses Dr. Sharon Irons of a 'calculated, profound personal betrayal' after their affair six years ago, saying she secretly kept semen after they had oral sex, then used it to get pregnant," the Associated Press reports. After toiling in Chicago courts for years, "An appeals court said [Phillips] can press a claim for emotional distress after learning a former lover had used his sperm to have a baby. But he can’t claim theft, the ruling said, because the sperm were hers to keep." Irons, who has established Phillips' paternity of the child, claims that she and Phillips had sexual intercourse on multiple occasions during their relationship..

Source: TBD

As I usually do when stories that resemble "evergreen" memes crop up I started looking for any other references to either of the two doctors and... pretty much couldn't find anything that wasn't related to the 2005 appeals court ruling.  Nothing about the initial ruling, nothing about other allegations, nothing about the child who'd now be a 10 or 11 year old, and definitely nothing about whether Dr. Phillips might have come to appreciate having a child even if (as he alleges but she disputes) Dr. Irons conceived the child in a very deplorable manner.  (I'd be bloody horrified to learn I had a child I didn't know about because I really, really enjoy being a father and it would totally gut me to miss out on the first two years of one of my children's lives, even if the mom was a total dick.)

Anyway, the only serious non-knee-jerk discussion of the case I found was this pretty cool and even-handed consideration of the case and its circumstances by Cornell Prof Sherry Colb at FindLaw, again, back in 2005: When Oral Sex Results in a Pregnancy: Can Men Ever Escape Paternity Obligations.

On the one hand, she says, the law is and has been since roughly the Code of Hammurabi that "when a baby comes into the world, both the man and the woman whose genes led up to the child's existence are ordinarily responsible for the care of that baby, regardless of whether the child was 'wanted' by both parents."  On the other hand "even if one accepts that intercourse equals consent to paternity, what happens when a man does not consent to intercourse? Does he still bear the risk of becoming a father? The case of Phillips and Irons ... tests our intuitions about that very question."

While Colb clearly accepts Phillips's claims for the sake of the argument she does nicely construct hypothetical cases where a man unambiguously (and, significantly, non-sexually) could become a biological partner.  And asks, correctly, why would a victim be held responsible for the care of a child he literally had only an absconded-with biological connection to.  (Colb doesn't mention it but see also the extreme-outlier statutory-rape/paternity mix-up case I mentioned a few posts ago.)

You need to read her post for the details, the upshot of which makes you realize that not only are there no easy questions, there are no easy answers either.  But in the end Colb comes down, narrowly and tentatively on the side of not holding a biological parent legally, economically, or physically responsible who literally has no responsibility for the creation of his child.

To which I would just add, implies, strongly, that the same must be true of holding legally or economically responsible a biological parent who equally literally has no responsibility for the creation of her child.  An item which, if Colb's opinion were made law, would offer an entirely non-"privacy penundrum" foundation for quite a bit of law regarding reproductive choice.  Egregious "no exception for rape" clauses being only the most obvious.

And finally, no, I never did find out anything else about that now-old appeals court case except a few terse newswire accounts and a lot of angry people's speculations and opinions thereof.  (Even Colb's post, while informed in terms of the law, is speculative in terms of the actual case.)  Nor is there any reason why such an old story would find itself revived.

Still, I'm glad it did.  Turns out Colb has written a ton of articles on legal issues near and dear to most of our hearts.  She doesn't always come down on my general side of issues but she usually does.  At this rate I'll be up all night reading pretty interesting treatments of gender, rape, reproductive rights, LGBT rights, etc, from her FindLaw blog.

User login