Pornography

"What's the Appeal of the 'Money Shot?'" Opinonz I Haz Them

Thu, 2012-01-19 21:38

Photo by Flickr user Universal Pops. Cached as a bandwidth-conserving courtesy
Photo by Flickr user Universal Pops. Used under a Creative Commons license.

So for their regular weekly Wise Guys feature Em & Lo asked for answers to a reader's question: "What’s the appeal of the “money shot?" Although I'm one of their Wise Guy contributors the question didn't pop up in my rotation. But I did leave a comment. Em & Lo were then nice enough to make it their comment of the week this week.

So once again the question was "What’s the appeal of the “money shot?" Here's what I said.

I’m not even stepping into the whole “facial” business. I’ll just point out Charlie Glickman’s thoughts from a post that arrived in my newsreader moments before this one.

Instead I’ll just say I think the “money shot” is a seriously stupid dual artifact of porn. First, in the production of porn it’s just way more convenient to towel semen off skin than out of bodily orifices and therefore it’s more cost effective. This is why, at least early on, it was the low-budget porn shops that did money shots rather than the well-heeled ones. Second, for decades, anyway, porn was primarily an aid for male masturbation and so, I think, money shots are a way to help watchers identify with male actors.

I really think the masturbation element is key. Yes, you’ll occasionally see men’s parters “finishing” them off, but for the vast, vast, vast majority of cases the man essentially stops interacting physically with his partner, steps back a ways, and basically jacks off.

Again, fine if you’re at home alone. But seems to me sort of the whole point of sex with a partner is to have sex with them… not just on them.

Now, that said, don’t get me wrong. If you’re both into it (and increasing numbers of both men and women seem to be) and it’s all good clean fun for both of you then great. Lots of great things about “sex” don’t actually involve sex.

Also, that said, another name for “money shots” is “the withdrawal method.” And while nothing in life is certain, when ejaculation occurs outside a partner’s body it at best reduces the odds of pregnancy and STI transmission and even at worst it evens them out between the semen donor and semen receiver. So that’s ok too.

But at the end of the day, for me, the physical pleasure reduction of orgasm via masturbation rather than with a partner isn’t worth whatever symbolic enjoyment it seems to bring other people.

So, again for me, thanks but no thanks.

Source: Em & Lo

Note: I shared the comment-of-the-week slot with fellow Wise Guy pinch-hitter Mark Luczak, who seems to share my assessment.

A Not-Recommended Solution to Writer's Block, Oh, Plus Reflections on Gender and "Crotch Shot" Self-Photography

Sun, 2011-11-13 12:53

It's often observed by college students that one is most inclined to clean one's room when one should be writing one's term papers. Similarly ones term papers urgently demand attention to the precise degree that one's room needs cleaning.

This morning I have been doubly productive -- not only cleaning to the uttermost depths of the refrigerator but also knocking out posts with aplomb. I have not, however, made an inch of progress on a project that a) I'll actually get paid to do that is b) due Monday morning. :-P

Meanwhile, though, I might as well mention something I've been meaning to write about in greater detail for several weeks. In one of my whirlwind patrols of the Tumblr erotic self-photograpy circuit I've started to notice more and more women seem to be picking up the vulva equivalent of male cock-shot syndrome. While increasing numbers of women seem to be engaging in this allegedly exclusively male behavior I don't know if they're yet emailing them to random recipients on dating sites. But I sort of imagine that as time passes and social permissions equalize we'll probably start seeing a little more of women doing it.

Another observation about the male-cock-shot syndrome. Just as not all women are likely to start exclusively posting 8x10 color glossies of their vulvas, it turns out that neither do most men!

It also occurs to me that, gender narratives notwithstanding, a lot of men may have been sending out those photos for the same reason women seem to have started doing it. Because they can, sure. But also not so much because they're aggressive or even utterly, esthetically clueless. I think instead it's because they imagine that everyone else will be as fascinated by the poster's locus of erotic pleasure as the posters themselves tend to be.

Well.

Duty calls.

Oh, not that duty though! I can't work on my paid, near-deadline project now, oh no. Now I have to go shopping for the week!

After that I may have to mop the roof! :-P

Sports Equipment Word to the Wise, Plus a Possible Sign that We've Reached Peak Porn

Sun, 2011-08-28 12:18

Photo by Flickr user Photoraphy_Gal. Cached as a bandwidth-conserving courtesy
Photo by Flickr user Photography_Gal. Used under a Creative Commons license.

Don't ask me why I would know such a thing but sex on a trampoline isn't as much fun as it sounds.

Actually that's not quite true. It's lovely to be outdoors, if you get a thrill out of the possibility of being seen or perhaps caught it can be fun, and hey, it's a nice relatively flat surface. And since trampolines are a great form of exercise and sex after mild physical exertion can be pretty great because of the increased circulation, oxygenation, muscle activation, and body warmth.

So let me rephrase my original sentence: "don't ask me why I would know such a thing but vigorous woman- or man-on-top PIV intercourse on a trampoline isn't as much fun as it sounds.

Yes, of the 100,000 or so trampoline-related emergency room visits sprained penises, bruised hips and pubic bones, and other pelvis-related injuries rank pretty low. But...

Oh wait, I said don't ask why I would know such a thing... :-)

I'll just say that it was years ago.

---

Incidentally, at least according to Google, while Rule #34 ("if you can imagine it there's porn of it") appears to be conserved thanks to a few relatively random uploads to sites like YouPorn, there do not appear to be any dedicated trampoline porn sites.

This, incidentally, could be more significant than some people might think. A few years ago I predicted that the flood of amateur photography made possible by stigma relaxation plus affordable home recording equipment plus ordinary network effects would have strong negative consequences in the market for paid porn. After all, 5 megapixel cameras on dumb cellphones are now par for the course so if even one tenth of one percent of the billion or so people with digital capability choose to upload images they've taken for their own enjoyment that's 100,000 new actors and models competing with paid performers and producers.

I'm confident there will always be specialty sites, particularly for the kinds of things far more people want to consume than are willing to produce for their own recreation (cough kink.com) but to invert William Gibson's famous quip, the future may not yet be evenly distributed but it's here.

---

Note: I don't object to commercial porn in principle, and the total market for professionals will never be completely replaced any more than affordable home equipment has replaced ordinary professional photographers. But the influx of volunteers both in front of and behind cameras has reduced the previously high opportunities for arbitraging the ability to make money by depicting fairly ordinary people engaging in what at the end of the day are fairly ordinary sexual activities.

Guest Blogging Opportunity: Strunk/White Slash Fiction

Mon, 2011-07-11 06:09

Note: I haven't done a "guest blogging" post for years. I used to do them whenever I went out of town. I'm now back from my epic trip to Greece (if not entirely over my epic case of 10-time-zone jet lag.) But this topic just knocks for a guest-post opportunity. So better late than never.

University of Pennsylvania linguistics professor Mark Liberman, no fan of the highly and often arbitrarily-prescriptive Elements of Style dryly notes

The most recent xkcd offers some sound editorial guidance:

The validity of the strip's title string ("The best thing about Strunk/White fanfiction is that it's virtually guaranteed to be well written") is less clear, for reasons that Geoff Pullum has explained at length in various places, for example here.

...

I have not been able to find any non-fictional instances of Strunk/White fan fiction, but we can hope that in the future, references to these names will more often be separated by a slash than by an ampersand. ]

Source: Language Log

Evidently there are entire websites (I think they're called "kink meme" sites) where slash fans who are readers can request character and activity pairings and other slash fans who are writers will attempt to fulfill the request.  I'm almost completely clueless about slash but I think Liberman could request Strunk/White slash fiction here.

Guest Blogger Opportunity: Feel free to write your own Strunk/White fiction either here in comments or on your own blog.

Request: If you know of other better Kink Meme sites (where one could best request Strink/White stories) let me know in comments and I'll promote them to the main post.

Final request: If you already know of Strunk/White slash, whether you've written it or just read it, you can of course links to that in comments as well.

Update from comments:

Note to Rep. Weiner: How to Improve the Odds of Being Appreciated by Women and Ignored by Brietbart

Tue, 2011-06-07 08:59

Note: The enclosed erotic male image is considered perfectly "safe for work" since it only shows body parts that straight men don't realize are sexy.  All links, however, lead to other NSFW posts.

Note to Rep. Weiner and... pretty much every other man who thinks it's the height of creativity to snap a pixie of their peepee and call it erotic, here's how you do it.

Australian sex-blogger and frequent erotic self-photographer GeekyVamp reposts another woman sex-blogger, Musingsandmischief's repost of a male self-photographer, Isinpi's photo.

Photo by Tumblr user Isinpi. Cached as a bandwidth-conserving courtesy
Photo by Tumblr user Isinpi.

Oh wow, mr Isinpi,

this pic deserves to be reblogged the shit out of. Well played sir, well played…

musingsandmischief:

Beautiful picture, no wonder I keep seeing reblogs with you getting tumblr ladies weak at the knees.

isinpi:

I can’t decide which one, so fuck it I’ll post two. Hands, clavicle, lips, and scruff in one photo.

Source: There May Be Tits There May Be Banter

It's not that women don't think penises are sexy.  Or that penis bulges veiled behind athlete-gray underpants are sexy.  A surprising number do.  But what seems to be an even more surprising number of women prefer a bit more context -- as, in fact, would most men if they too were regularly innundated with random unsolicited closeups of solicitous women's vulvas.  Once context is established (and believe it or not, intentionally visiting a porn site establishes some kind of context) then one has a great deal more latitude.

But for out of the blue imagery?  Even when you want to preserve your anonymity?  Well.  If you follow the link to his Tumblr post and check out who's already followed and/or liked the photo you'll find that as of this morning (the photo was posted this morning) fifteen women (and no men) have indicated their approval and several, like GV and MAM have reposted it to their own erotic-photography blogs.

Hint, maybe?  Clue perhaps?

The funniest thing?  I could be mistaken but I'm guessing that Rep. Weiner could post and tweet photos like this all day long and the likes of Andrew Brietbart would never register it.  Or if they did they wouldn't register it as anything but some kind of artsy-fartsy east-coast liberal noodlings.  Because, you see, it wouldn't be porn for men.

Now I don't happen to think there's anything wrong with porn for men per se. And of course there are plenty of women who are downright cheerful about consuming it (and of course men who aren't.)  But that's not the point.

The point is, it seems to me, that if you're interested in women, and if you're going to go around sending random, unsolicited photos of yourself to women, then maybe you should take, oh, five or ten minutes to find out what women find most eye-catching about men.  And try sending that instead.

Especially if you're going to send them via Twitter.  Because, you see, while in the ancient history that was the world before Twitter (i.e. July, 2006) and before Tumblr (i.e. 2007) it was quite a bit harder to find out what sort of erotic images of heterosexual men women preferred.  But nowadays?  If you were interested you could find out pretty quickly.  But you would have to be interested.

Update: While watering the planter boxes just now it occurred to me that I might sound like I'm claiming I know this photo but not that one will work as "porn for women."  I'm just saying that if you want to know what works, look at what women are saying works!  Same's true, obviously, about all manner of other kinds of decisions, sex-related or not, about what works for all kinds of people.  Even when you think you know what should work for other people.

Also, this post obviously isn't supposed to be an enlightening tract on how people, in Congress, in power, or otherwise, should and should not impose themselves sexually on those who have not indicated it would be appreciated. 

The Egregious "Porn for Women" Meme: I think It Depends on How He's Folding the Laundry or Making the Bed

Thu, 2011-06-02 19:52

Jill Filipovic says

In the aftermath of the Anthony Weiner weiner-scandal, the Washington Post asks women what kind of sexts (as they kids say) they’d appreciate receiving. Women ™ say:

“I would like a photo of a made bed,” says Kathryn Roberts, who works at a law firm in Washington. “I would take rose petals, but I want them on top of a made bed.” And not that fake kind of made, either, where the comforter is smooth but the sheets are a jumbled mess.

“Or laundry,” adds her friend Andrea Neurohr.

“Folded laundry,” elaborates Roberts. “Maybe in a wicker basket.”

Get it? Cleaning is so important to women it’s basically pornography! Haha oh women, with their clean laundry and their distaste for sexual pleasure and the male body.

Source: Feministe

Back when I was posting a lot of nude and/or erotic self-photography I went ahead and tested the hypothesis that women would rather see men folding laundry or making beds.  The results were positive but most of my non-domestic photo series were considerably more popular.

At any rate, based on my past experience I think whether photos of men folding laundry or making beds can be sexy has a lot more to do with the men and a lot less to do with the laundry.*

See the "Half-Nekkid Thursday" version of this post, with less safe-for-work examples,here.

* Note: if you're going to put rose petals on a bed there's a good chance you're going to have to use bleach to get the stains out.  Or else, I guess, use rose-colored sheets.

The Egregious "Porn for Women" Meme: I think It Depends on How He's Folding the Laundry or Making the Bed

Thu, 2011-06-02 19:33

Jill Filipovic says

In the aftermath of the Anthony Weiner weiner-scandal, the Washington Post asks women what kind of sexts (as they kids say) they’d appreciate receiving. Women ™ say:

“I would like a photo of a made bed,” says Kathryn Roberts, who works at a law firm in Washington. “I would take rose petals, but I want them on top of a made bed.” And not that fake kind of made, either, where the comforter is smooth but the sheets are a jumbled mess.

“Or laundry,” adds her friend Andrea Neurohr.

“Folded laundry,” elaborates Roberts. “Maybe in a wicker basket.”

Get it? Cleaning is so important to women it’s basically pornography! Haha oh women, with their clean laundry and their distaste for sexual pleasure and the male body.

Source: Feministe

Back when I was posting a lot of nude and/or erotic self-photography I went ahead and tested the hypothesis that women would rather see men folding laundry or making beds.  The results were positive but most of my non-domestic photo series were considerably more popular.

At any rate, based on my past experience I think whether photos of men folding laundry or making beds can be sexy has a lot more to do with the men and a lot less to do with the laundry.*

Photo by figleaf.
Photo by figleaf.

Photo by figleaf.
Photo by figleaf.
All photos by figleaf (hey that's me!) Posted with a Creative Commons license. .

Happy HNT (or Half-nekkid Thursday!)

* Note: if you're going to put rose petals on a bed there's a good chance you're going to have to use bleach to get the stains out.  Or else, I guess, use rose-colored sheets.

And Rounding Out The Wedding Crashers Demolition: TVTropes.com is Awesome About Thoughtless and Cliche Uses of Rape in Media

Sun, 2011-05-29 14:04

ZOMG! While digging further into the convention that rape in popular media is ok when it's women raping men, as in The Wedding Crashers, I ran into a pretty cool, and awesomely level-headed website that deals directly with the issue. It's called, not quite correctly, Television Tropes and Idioms. Not quite correctly, I say, because it covers not just tropes in TV but also movies, comics, and advertising. Also, in a way even better, in anime, hentai, and fan-fic.

What's fun about the site is that while they seem pretty solidly informed about the realities of sexual assault and rape they don't treat the issues as a gender or moral failing, they treat them as the lazy, knee-jerk, graceless, and unskilled writing clichés they almost always are.

Rape Is OK When It Is Female on Male

Obviously if you're watching a scene with a woman tied to a bed while a man forces sex on her, the final act of that movie will involve said man getting shot in the face by Bruce Willis. If, on the other hand, it's a man being tied down and forced into sex by a pretty lady, well, you're watching a wacky romantic comedy. — C. Coville, 6 Romantic Movie Gestures That Can Get You Prison Time, Cracked.com

Rape is a cruel and evil act, beyond kicking the dog or many of the most villainous acts in media. Except when they fall in love with the rapist, of course.

In a number of works, however, there is one other exception: when the victim is a man, and the attacker is a woman.

This kind of rape is often treated as nil since men are stereotyped as having nothing but sex on the brain, always eager for it and cannot be traumatized by sex if it is arousing. Consequently, a man raped by an attractive woman is considered a lucky man and a man being raped by an unattractive woman is comedy gold. Because of this, most examples are from comedies.

Compare Rape Is Okay When It's Female On Female, Rape Is Funny When It Is Male On Male, Rape As Comedy, and Rape Is Okay If It's Divine On Mortal.

Source: Television Tropes and Idioms (note: click through to see myriad links and examples)

So that's pretty straightforward -- right on the money when it comes to easy dismissal of sexual assault on men. (The Wedding Crashers is referenced in the lead quote and mentioned first under "Movies" in very-long list of examples.) And good for them.

But check out the scorn they heap on the fan-fic trope they call Rape Is The New Dead Parents (emphasis in 2nd paragraph mine.)

"It turns out that Darkness, Diabolo, Crab and Goyle's dad was a vampire. He committed suicide by slitting his wrists with a razor. He had raped them and stuff before too. They all got so depressed that they became goffik and converted to Stanism [sic]. —My Immortal

"The rape was thrown in there for good measure." — Bennett The Sage on the above

A lot of amateur writers out there find the tragic backstory appealing. After all, most of the interesting characters didn't get raised in Suburbia, USA with a loving, complete family that cared for them. That's just boring. But Character Development is hard... You mean you have to explain things? But it takes so long to establish mental illness, and physical handicaps would only get in the way. Can't you just say they got raped and be done with it?

Anyway, this is the tendency for writers who are just starting out, or for very lazy writers, often of fanfiction and role playing, but it can appear just about anywhere, to just casually drop rape into their characters' story for Deus Angst Machina or Wangst. Usually found in backstory, but it's not uncommon for rape to happen "on-screen" via two sentences that wouldn't qualify as IKEA Erotica. The writers want to add some dimension of frailty to their character and give a good reason for moodiness, but it's done in such a flimsy and unexplored way that it means... nothing. It's mentioned like mentioning a casual detail on a college application. Perhaps the hallmark of the Sympathetic Sue, this trope tends to evoke kneejerk righteous anger with its use. It takes one of those horrible things which take years to get over, if ever, and turns it into a rather cheap shock.

...

The classical line for this trope is "Jane once got raped when walking home one night [optional:and her parents didn't care]."

Note that this is not merely Rape As Backstory. While it often overlaps, that has its own page and is neutral. Also note that this is not just poorly handled rape; it has to be out of the story's attention within at most a minute and never show up again.

The trope name comes from the fact that Parental Abandonment used to be the stock "tragic background" of badly created characters. Perhaps due to a combination of dead parents being considered cliche by uncaring writers (and less common in Real Life) and the fact that they think rape spares everything short of the character's virginity, it has replaced the dead parents for lazy tragedy.

Physically abusive parents are quickly becoming popular as the go to tragic backstory. Then again, rape is often still involved.

Examples of this in amateur writing are too numerous to list and too forgettable to remember. It still occasionally makes its way into the more dubious works, however. Differentiated from Rape As Drama and Rape As Comedy in that its neither of these. It's just... there.

Before adding an example, please think of whether or not the trope could be removed without impacting the rest of the story any more than 2% requiring a rewrite.

See also how rape is dismissed in Rape Is Okay When It's Female On Female

"in large part based on the idea that lesbian sex is not "real" sex. Men, penises, and penile penetration are central to sexual relations; without a penis involved, there can be no sex, and without sex, there can be no rape. Therefore, anything a woman does to another woman is "not a big deal."

And check out Rape Is Funny When It Is Male On Male

But male rape is funny... At least to the guy doing the raping. — Theory of Everything

It's not.

A subtrope of Rape As Comedy. Usually played for laughs when a known straight character is hit on by another man, especially one that's physically larger.

Even when it's not supposed to be funny, it's still considered funny. Scenes like the outright rapes shown in films such as Deliverance, Pulp Fiction and The Shawshank Redemption are obviously supposed to be horrific; however they are routinely snickered at, rather than cried over as with male-on-female rape-scenes.

Anyway, it's a cool site throughout.

Lot of Educators Getting Fired for Past or Present Sex-Related Activities Lately

Tue, 2011-03-15 12:38

Well this is sort of getting to be a stuck record.  There's yet another education professional in the news (and in the unemployment office) for past or current involvement in stripping or other sex work.

Some of you may recall Sheila Addison's 2008 guest post at Kate Harding's Shapely Prose about one of her masters in counseling psychology course offerings : "Size Acceptance in a Systems Framework." She's also guest-posted at the California National Organization for Women blog, Civil liberties: Now with more privileged people.

Her not-yet-scrubbed faculty bio says

Dr. Addison heads the Couple and Family specialization, and is passionate about using family systems theory to guide clinical work aimed at supporting happier, healthier relationships. She is a Clinical Member of the American Association for Marriage and Family Therapy, and an AAMFT Approved Supervisor. Her professional work focuses on couples, GLBT clients, families with adolescents, and those who live in marginalized communities. She practices from a feminist, multicultural, integrative family systems perspective; her work is concerned with relational justice, issues of gender and culture, the operation of power in relationships and increasing capacity for intimacy and emotion. She is the co-author of five chapters in "The Therapist's Notebook for Gay, Lesbian, and Bisexual Clients," and of a chapter on sexuality and supervision in "Readings in Family Therapy Supervision." In December 2008, "Multicultural Couple Therapy" will be released, which includes two chapters with Dr. Addison as the lead author, one on white privilege and one on work with minority same-sex couples. She often teaches Systemic Theory and Family Therapy, Couples Therapy (focusing on the work of John Gottman and the Emotionally Focused Therapy of Susan Johnson), and various family therapy theories such as Bowen Family Systems, Nagy/Contextual Therapy, Metaframeworks, Satir/Human Validation Process, and feminist therapy.

Source: John F. Kennedy University GSPPP faculty page

A site called Courthouse News Service says (emphasis mine)

A professor claims John F. Kennedy University fired her illegally for appearing in "a burlesque show" called the "'Hubba Hubba Revue' ... which provides political and social commentary on gender, sexuality, and body image stereotypes."

...

JFKU President Steven Stargardter fired her in a letter dated June 21, 2010, Addison says: "Defendant Stargardter stated in the letter that he was terminating Addison's employment because of her performances in a burlesque show entitled 'Hubba Hubba Revue.' No other reason was given for Addison's termination."

 

Source: Courthouse News Service

Oh, and to top it all off, Courthouse News and other sources say

But [JFK] did not fire a male professor who at the same time was doing a one-man show "which included disrobing and partial nudity on stage.

I'm sure there are extenuating circumstances that explain the different treatments.  For instance the male professor probably isn't an LGBT-friendly, feminist, size-acceptance activist... oh, wait!  That doesn't sound very extenuating!

 

M'Kay, Time to Stop: 18-Year-Old Selena Gomez is Not a "Cougar" for Dating a 17-Year-Old

Tue, 2011-03-01 23:51

Lilith notes that Cosmopolitan Magazine's stance on Selena Gomez and Justin Bieber's relationship is... well... just as fucked up as everything else about Cosmo.

Yes, that's right. Cougar-in-training. Gomez is 18, Bieber will turn 17 in just a few days (March 1st). How the hell is she training to be a cougar, when her boyfriend is less than 2 years younger than her? The concept of 'cougars' in general is kind of offensive to begin with (who cares if a woman is older than the man she dates? why isn't there a name like that for a man who dates younger women?) but it's just downright ridiculous to call an 18-year-old girl a cougar.

Source: Evil Slutopia

The whole "cougar" idea's pretty insulting all around, let alone the specific idea that all it takes is for the woman to be older than her partner... even when the difference is only a matter of months.

I mean, unless there was the possibility that that's all it meant.  But even then that's making a dumb distinction.

Little known relationship factoid from the 1960s: the most stable marriages were those where the woman was at least two years older than her husband.  I'm not sure how well-established that was, or is, or whether it applies today.  But here's an even lesser-known factoid: back then they didn't call them "cougars."  They called them women who were older than their husbands.  Which was usually shortened to "women."

My grandmother on my dad's side was quite a bit older than my grandfather.  They were married till death did them part.  And got along pretty well.  I'm... pretty positive that at no point did her a cougar.

Seriously, though, both "cougar," for a woman who's interested in younger men, and "MILF," which has sort of morphed into the object of a younger man's interest, are both just... pretty unnecessary terms.

User login