bias

And Hey Ben Stein - Paul Bernardo Was Released the First Time Because How Many Amway/Accountants Commit Violent Sex Crimes?

Thu, 2011-05-19 12:35

Photo by Flickr user murraystateunive. Cached as a bandwidth-conserving courtesy
Photo by American-Spectator-splainer Ben Stein by Flickr user murraystateuniversity. Used under a Creative Commons license.

According to his Wikipedia Entry Paul Bernardo, the Canadian boy scout, economics student, accountant, and Amway distributor(!!) benefitted from the same attitudes that asshole enabler and conservative performance artist Ben Stein wants us all to grant to the recently-arrested former IMF chief Dominique Strauss-Kahn. (Emphasis mine.)

Investigation and release

Between May and September 1990, the police had submitted more than 130 suspects' samples for DNA testing when they received two reports that the person they were seeking was Paul Bernardo. The first, in June, had been called in by a bank employee. The second call was received from Tina Smirnis, the wife of one of the three Smirnis brothers who were among Bernardo's closest friends. Smirnis told the detectives that Bernardo "had been 'called in' on a previous rape investigation — once in December, 1987 - but he had never been interviewed." He frequently talked about his sex life to Smirnis and liked analingus, rough sex and anal sex.

Alex Smirnis' phrasing was awkward and stilted and consequently left the detectives unsure of whether to take him seriously. But after cross-checking several files the detectives decided to interview Bernardo. The interview, on November 20, 1990, lasted 35 minutes and Bernardo voluntarily gave samples for forensic testing. When the detectives asked Bernardo why he thought he was being investigated for the rapes, he admitted that he did resemble the composite. The detectives concluded that such a well-educated, well-adjusted, congenial young man couldn't be responsible for the vicious crimes; he "was far more credible than...Alex Smirnis who, with his awkward, strange way of speaking, might just be trying to collect the reward." Paul Bernado was released the following day.

Source: Bernardo's Wikipedia Entry

Oh well, as Ben Stein and his approving publishers at The American Spectator would no-doubt say, "Can anyone tell me any boy-scout/accountant/Amway guys who have been convicted of violent sex crimes?"

Although of course I'm sure he meant other than Paul Bernardo.

Hat tip Soren in comments

Hey Ben Stein, How Many Major Air Force Base Commanders Have Committed Violent Sex Crimes?

Thu, 2011-05-19 08:20

Randall Munroe took two minutes to answer Ben Stein's (and by extension The American Spectator's) fatuously privileging question regarding the arrest of IMF leader Dominique Strauss-Kahn: "People who commit crimes tend to be criminals, for example. Can anyone tell me any economists who have been convicted of violent sex crimes?"

On a whim, I just did a little research, and couldn’t believe what I found.  Guess who holds an economics degree?

Paul Bernardo.

For those not familiar with the case, Bernardo is one of the nastiest serial killers in history. He and his wife drugged, raped, and tortured to death a number of schoolgirls in the late 80’s and early 90’s. The story is the stuff of nightmares.

Source: xkcd blog

To be fair, Bernardo may not have been a "true" economist -- when he began murdering his victims he was only majoring in economics.  So Stein and his fellow rape apologists at the Spectator could probably say "yes, but what true Scotsman economist has been convicted?"

The flip answer would be that James Urbaniak was able to quickly come up with a list of professional, public economists who've been convicted of violent sex crimes.

The better answer to Stein's logic (and a more chilling answer in most ways) would be to ask the conceptually identical question "how many air force base commanders in major NATO countries have been convicted of violent sex crimes?"

I'd just add that my question isn't just about Stein's classic-Republican "seen any elephants*" logical fallacy.  It turns out that not only were they both serial rapist/murderers, Paul Bernardo and former CFB Trenton Base Commander Russell Williams may have been acquaintances in college but they may have taken the same economics classes.

* Recall jokes of the form "Q: Bobby, why are you tearing up strips of paper?" "A: To keep the elephants out of the pantry?"  "Q: How do you know that keeps elephants away?"  "A: Seen any elephants

Coke Talk on a Completely Different Way Breast Implants May Not Be For You

Fri, 2011-01-14 23:54

Coke Talk's lowdown on someone for running down breast implants.

With your skanky brand of gender politics, of course you don’t see the point. Fuck you for even suggesting that it has anything to do with what you like to grope.

Source: Dear Coke Talk

Having been of the same opinion that fashion in general and boobs in particular were all about me -- that since I thought they looked and felt funny people shouldn't get them -- I appreciate Coke Talk's sentiment a lot more now than I would have then.

Same would be true if I instead thought implants were sexxxay.  They're still pretty much almost never for me.

That's not to say that as well as perfectly good and perfectly neutral reasons there are plenty of questionable reasons to get implants.  Or other body modifications.  Just that those reasons for questioning it have nothing to do with my personal opinion, my personal judgment, or my personal preferences.  Or anyone else's.

The No Sex Class: Men as the Sex Class and How Asexual Men Are Made the Exception that Proves the Rule

Thu, 2010-06-24 09:27

SlightlyMetaphysical of Asexual curiosities has had enough of a certain near-universal gender stereotype. Even better, he beautifully illustrates how men are socially constructed as the obligate, reflexively sexual “sex class.” Check it out.

“Isn’t it annoying how men are really sex-obsessed?”
“Not all men are sex-obsessed. If you thought about it for a moment, you’d realise that a lot of the men you know aren’t.”
“Give me an example.”
“I’m not.”
“Well, you don’t count. You’re asexual.”

“I think everyone would secretly do anything for sex, they’re just hiding it.”
“Again, not true. I wouldn’t.”
“Yeah, but you don’t count. You’re asexual.”

So what’s with this idea that, because I’m asexual, I’m outside of the normal spectrum of sexuality? I’m statistically written off? I think partly, it’s an example of how people construct a ‘no true Scotsman’ fallacy in their stereotypes, especially of gender. They think that, for example, men like sex, and so think of men who like sex as being most typically men, and then, when they think of the people who they know who are typically male, surprise surprise, they all like sex.

He said it here.

Got that? The notion of men as the sex class is so entrenched that men who don’t fit the profile aren’t even permitted in the data set! It’s like… well, we wanted to do a sexual-interest profile of men. But since including them always screw up our results we discard asexuals before we do our analysis.

I’ll go him one better! In the face of such stereotypes about men, men with low or no libido are going to be extremely unlikely to disclose their actual preferences… and actually rather likely to pretend otherwise. Either way they have very little incentive to buck the stereotype.

Can't Top That

Wed, 2009-03-25 12:31


Image from That’s My Topper shop. Click to view.

Britni Danielle of Oh My God, That Britni’s Shameless weighs in on the particular peculiarity of contemporary marriage laws as they relate to bisexuals.

I am not planning on getting married any time soon. In fact, I don’t know if I plan on ever getting married. Plus, as the law stands now, if I end up spending my life with a woman, I wouldn’t be able to marry her anyway. I don’t know if I could find a good enough reason to marry a man, even if I’m in love with him and want to spend my life with him, just because the law lets me due to the fact that he possesses a penis and I possess a vagina (when it wouldn’t let me if my partner had a vagina).

She said it here.

She said it by way of introducing a wedding-cake statuette site called That’s My Topper.

The item pictured above is from the site. This topper, called “Double Happiness” is evidently the Chinese character for marriage or wedding. It should escape no one’s notice that a) there’s no obvious indication of gender in the characters b) the twin symbols are identical and side by side, and c) they describe emotional and spiritual essence instead of physical description. Pretty nice idea, that.

More On Sex and Aging

Wed, 2008-06-18 13:53

And with perfect timing as a follow-up to this post Via Alex of Neatorama, Time Magazine has an article by Michiko Toyama about Japanese “elder porn”

Besides his glowing complexion, Shigeo Tokuda looks like any other 74-year-old man in Japan. Despite suffering a heart attack three years

ago, the lifelong salaryman now feels healthier, and lives happily with his wife and a daughter in downtown Tokyo. He is, of course, more physically active than most retirees, but that’s because he’s kept his part-time job — as a porn star.

...

Tokuda is rare among Japanese porn stars in that his name has become a brand. The Shigeo Tokuda series he’s just completed portray him as a tactful elderly gentleman who instructs women of different ages in the erotic arts, and he boasts a body of work far more impressive than most actors in their prime.

Read article here.

As A from France put in in comments on that previous post, “We feel exactly the same as we ever did but people judge us from our outward appearances, or our birth certificates.” It’s easy to mock John Derbyshire’s claim that women are already “over the hill” after puberty but if he’d said instead that men and women are over the hill considerably later — say 65, or 75, or so how many people would have mocked him then?

If You'd Known You'd Have Lived That Long You'd Have More Compassion For the Elderly

Tue, 2008-06-17 22:28


Photo by Flickr user avdgaag. Used under a Creative Commons license.

SadieStein at Jezebel says

Slate’s recent piece on the forbidden love of a couple suffering from dementia has hit a nerve. The pair (82 and 95, respectively) met at an assisted-living facility and embarked on a relationship that quickly grew passionately physical. When 95-year-old Bob’s son walked in on his father receiving oral sex from his girlfriend, Dorothy, he pitched a fit, complained to the home’s management – who separated them – and then summarily moved his father to another facility, citing concerns for Bob’s health – after which Dorothy went into steep decline.

...

The article suggests that Bob’s son’s reaction was as much “ick factor” at the thought (and sight) of his nanogenarian father’s active sex life as reasoned concern. It is certainly true that as a society we’re conditioned to think of old-folks’ sex as automatically risible and somewhat grotesque.

She said it here.

OWCH at Daily Kos says

In light of kos’ display of Barack Obama’s birth certificate, John McCain’s campaign has released a rare glimpse of the Republican candidate’s own birth certificate.

...

Thought lost for the ages, the document was found in a clay jar, in an abandoned cave, on the outskirts of Sedona, by a shepherd boy in 1947. The desert climate and the dry atmosphere in the caves kept the parchment remarkably well preserved.

OWCH said it here.

Just a word to the wise: making jokes about John McCain’s age is sort of like making jokes about Hillary Clinton’s gender. You can be a twit and focus on superficiality instead of substance if and only if you’re prepared to claim that your only problem with individual X is his age, or her gender, or his orientation, or her drunk-driving conviction. Since, at least with John McCain, if age really is your only reservation then…

Good luck getting past your kid’s “ick factors” when you’re looking for a little privacy some time after age 82. It might not sound that hot now but… I’m pretty sure it won’t seem like nearly such a bad idea when you get there yourself. M’may?

User login