Even with extensive manual blocking I’ve still been manually deleting up to hundreds of seemingly-hand-entered spams a day. I’m trying yet another new filter. The good news is 99% of the time your real comments should go through unchallenged, and the 1% of the time they are you’ll be asked to fill out a Captcha.
Let me know in comments if you can’t, comment. Um… no, wait, let me know in email (address here) if you can’t comment.
Apologies all around.
figleaf
Head’s up for Seattle-area readers: Rachel Kramer Bussel will be appearing with friends at Elliott Bay Book Company tonight, Tue, 02/23/2010, at 7:00pm. They’ll be reading from Rachel’s new anthology Best Sex Writing 2010
February being a month when eros is on the calendar, if not in the air (Valentine’s Day, Carnival, and more), editor Rachel Kramer Bussel being here to read from and discuss the anthology, Best Sex Writing 2010 (Cleis) is particularly apt. She is senior editor at Penthouse Variations, is the former “Lusty Lady” columnist for The Village Voice, and runs a New York City erotica reading series, “In the Flesh.” She also did the hard work of putting together an anthology that embraces many different takes on sex and sensuality—which adds to the pleasures of this book. Reading with Rachel Kramer Bussel tonight are two local contributors to the anthology, Michelle Perrot and Janet Hardy.
The Elliott Bay Book Company
101 S. Main St.
Seattle, Washington 98104
I like Rachel’s “Best Sex Writing” series. There’s nothing wrong with erotica either, of course, and Rachel’s no slouch when it comes to editing those. This series covers more of the nuts and bolts of sex, of coping with, say, complications of sex while pregnant or nursing, the contradictions of sex education in purity ball culture, the commonalities of political sex scandals, or the factors condom manufacturers must juggle to make their products safe, effective, and marketable.
Janet Hardy, who will be reading with Rachel, is co-author of the classic (and recently-revised) The Ethical Slut: A Practical Guide to Polyamory, Open Relationships & Other Adventures.
Michelle Perrot is a pen name for Kerry Cohen, a therapist, writer, mother of an autism-spectrum child, and author of Loose Girl: A Memoir of Promiscuity.
If I can possibly make it I will. I hope you can make it too.
Update: I’ll be there. I’m looking forward to it.
Quick note: I’m finally back from vacation, plus various other strong distractions, and I’ve finally had time to fix the blog. It should operate quite a bit faster. I’ll be taking a couple of steps to limit the hordes of comment spam I was getting before, including requiring comment previews again (sorry) and, if necessary, closing comments in older posts. If you notice other problems please let me know. Hopefully in comments. Finally, I’ve got a hella backlog of emails for the last two weeks or so. I’ll be trying to catch up this week.
The question for the Wise Guys advice feature on Em & Lo last week was says
What is the appeal (or not) of a woman who’s completely bare down there?
Read three answers from the Wise Guys, and at least 55 other answers in comments, here.
Yes, yes, I’ve already beaten the point to death but for immediately personal reasons related to my having not shaved while on vacation I’m going to give it one more whack.
I’m sitting here contemplating a rare but very irritated razor-burn rash under my chin, thanks in part to a razor blade I forgot to change, thanks in even more part to the fact that I had about a week’s worth of stubble and it’s really hard to see under my chin when I shave (always in the shower) and the surfaces are really hard to navigate a razor around safely anyway. Anyway, the irritated skin and hair follicles remind me once again how shaving is unnatural no matter who does it. Or where.
That said, my bare face is definitely more sensitive when my partner touches me there. It’s definitely easier to keep my face clean when shave regularly. I should also say that most of my partners have preferred to kissing and being kissed without a beard rather than with one. Personally I think I just tend to look better clean-shaven than with a beard or mustache. And of course some employers have been very strict about how my head and facial hair should be groomed.
Even without considering visual or partner or public preferences I think most people shave various parts of their bodies for the same reason I shave mine: occasional razor burn notwithstanding it’s more practical and the sensations are nicer for me.
But yikes! If you’re going to shave anything it’s a very good idea to keep your $#*@ razor blades sharp.

Figleaf and family members skiing near the Canadian border while his blog was broken.
Update Ok, I’m back and I’m hopeful the changes I’ve made have a) improved performance without b) breaking anything else. :-) The good news is you should now be able to let me know in comments.
—-
I’m back from vacation where I had a genuinely lovely time with my family. I don’t think I’ve ever been anywhere so close to civilization while nevertheless being so far from online communication! No cell-phone service, no wifi, not even TV reception! Gas,yes. Roads, yes. Even espresso stands. Very nice skiing (if also very short of new snow.) Just no connectivity. I assume the Olympics are going well. Funny how we were so close to Vancouver (just an hour or so as the crow flies) but so deeply between mountains we might as well have been on the moon.
Anyway, I’m back but my blog is still somewhat broken. I can post, obviously, but comments are off the menu. I may not be able to get to that till Monday.
Update: Comments should be turned back on now.
—-
Just a quick note to say that just as I was packing up to go on a short break with my family it looks as though my site has come under a spam-based denial of service attack. Charming for any on-line drug addicts who really, really wish to be scammed by some servers in the former Soviet Union but a major irritation for everyone else. Or at least me.
As usual when I’m out of town there will be little or no internet connectivity, which is a problem because it looks like I need to be able to get inside to fix this. Performance on the site may be slow or spotty till Friday morning.
My apologies.
I almost never get it together to participate in really important “meme” days of remembrance, or even days of celebration, on the actual designated day.
If I hadn’t stumbled across it at Scarleteen I’d have missed remembering today is Blog for Choice Day. And by the time I’d figured it out (sometime over the weekend) I’d feel dumb for having missed it and not say anything at all.
Most years I’d just say “every day ought to be blog for choice day anyway” and be done with it. This year, though, the new Republican-activist majority on the Supreme Court has handed down it’s… fascinating decision that, say, the entire Walmart Corporation has the same just-folks right to pay as much as it wants immediately before an election as any supporter of a small-town zoning-board candidate. Which suggests they might as easily next use identical logic rule that abortion restrictions are just as they infringe on pregnant men’s rights no less than pregnant women’s.
In these days of disappointment it’s so tempting to think of just staying home next time there’s an election… as, for instance, millions chose to stay home in 2000, 2004 when it might have made a difference who replaced Justices Reinquest and O’Connor.
It’s your choice to do so again in 2010.
Enjoy it while you can.
Happy Blog for Choice day.
My first post here, from January 20th, 2005. (A Thursday no less.)
Happy HNT (or Half-nekkid Thursday!)
As you might have noticed if you’ve visited my site I’ve been inundated by spam from a Chinese company offering knockoff copies of the winter equivalent of Crocs rubber shoes. Their trick, evidently, is to just getting human readers to type the Captcha codes.
So I’ve turned on an Akismet-based spam filter instead to see if a) it works any better to block the bootie spammers but also to see if b) it doesn’t filter anyone else. I’m doing this reluctantly since, for instance, Akismet blocks me when I type “realadultsex.com” in other people’s comment boxes! But other methods haven’t worked and I’m guessing the bootie spammers aren’t going to stop so…
I’ve got a couple of other options if this method proves to be more hassle to you than it’s worth. If you get completely stuck trying to comment please email my Gmail account, where my username is TalkingFigleaf. Extra credit if you put the words “I got filtered” in the title.
My apologies for any inconvenience.
figleaf
Update: Ok, so Akismet blocks me as spam when I comment on this site! That plus it seemed really, really slow. So I set the tool to use TypePad AntiSpam instead. That not only let my own comments through despite the “provocative” URL but did so in about 1/10th the time. Again, let me know if you have problems commenting. But I feel more confident about that.
Update: I’m going to (vaguely) miss the eerily prescient reCaptcha keywords from the old anti-spam feature. But I know it was a hassle for a lot of would-be commenters. The new system doesn’t make you jump through that hoop any longer.
Echidne of the Snakes on an… interesting tendency in comments to posts by or about women
Imagine if I wrote like that about men! I wouldn’t do it, of course, because I don’t believe in reverse sexism any more than the old-fashioned sexism, but I would never get away with it. Yet these guys do seem to provoke no real outrage. I have read comments like these on Huffington Post, attached to various stories at mainstream news sites, on YouTube (OK, I give you the fact that YouTube commenters seem to come from some kind of green algae society but the sexism in the comments following women performers’ songs is stunning.), and now even at the website of the Finnish state television.
Yet the mainstream argument is that it is feminists who hate men!!!
It occurs to me from time to time that it doesn’t help, at all, that the majority of anti-feminist motivation derives from the also-interesting belief that women are moral paragons not so much because they’re naturally more moral, tidy, and virtuous but because (the belief goes) men are animals who would lick their butt the way dogs do if they could just reach it, and who would drink out of toilets too but for their moms telling them not to. With the result that every flaw in any man’s character “just goes to show” while any hint of clay in a woman’s feet becomes ZOMG!!!THEMBETRAYINGBICHESAREDRIVINGSOCIETYTORUIN!!!!!
Sigh.
It’s as if they see their “policing” of women as proof of their own desperate need to be lifted out of the sewers… they don’t recognize they actually occupy by choice.
Last week we learned that the popular macho commercial-writing blogger was James Chartrand an anonymous woman’s constructed persona.
This week there are allegations that a popular sex-work blogger might be the constructed persona of another anonymous writer, possibly a man.
Without going much into the controversy (since I hadn’t really followed the blog itself or been aware of the allegations and accusations) I’ll just mention that Mistress Matisse, who had her own run-in with online skepticism and confirmation in the late 1990s, has written two excellent posts on the matter.
Matisse’s second post, by the way, includes what I think is characteristically intelligent, generous offer that could use a reputable third party to confirm the blogger’s story while preserving her anonymity.