discrimination

This Three Year Old Girl Has No Problem Getting It -- So What's Wrong With Grown-ups?

Mon, 2012-01-02 12:54

Lisa Wade says

Her Dad corrects her, saying “Boys, well, boys want both…”

But her Dad is wrong.  Boys in the U.S. are taught from a very early age to avoid everything associated with girls.  Being called a “girl” is, in itself, an insult to boys.  And the slurs “sissy” and “fag” are reserved for men who act feminine.  So, no, boys (who have learned the rules of how to be a boy) generally reject anything girly.  (Indeed, this was one of the themes of Jimmy Kimmel “bad present” prank played by parents on their kids.)

The girl’s Dad, however, articulates a symmetrical analysis. The idea is that there are gender stereotypes — ones that apply to boys and ones that apply to girls — and that both are inaccurate, unfair, and constraining.  His mistake is in missing the asymmetrical value placed on masculinity and femininity.  Boys and girls are simply not positioned equally in relationship to stereotypes of femininity and masculinity.

Source: Sociological Images

 

What I sort of want to know is... given how totally full of awesome this kid is at, what, age three or maybe early four, why on this big blue marble would anyone mind being associated with girls, being a girl, being mistaken for a girl, admiring the dickens out of girls, and so on. And why would anyone waste an average of .5 liters of tidal volume wishing they had more sons instead of daughters, or selectively fucking aborting daughters, etc.?

You know what's really great about that video? She could have been my daughter at that age, who certainly made observations that astute. And you know what's great about that? Neither the girl in the video nor my daughter are curve-bending prodigies -- they're perfectly normal, perfectly sensible human beings who are special as possible to their loved ones but nothing like unique. Which is good because if they were prodigies there might be some excuse for excepting them but still grubbing every other human with XX pairing at the 23rd chromosome.*

Instead girls rock because people rock. Sure, some rock more than others... because some people rock more than others. Still no cause for culturally drowning girls... and only girls, naturally... in a deep pink sea.

* For starters. There are plenty of other ways of designating "girls" for the purpose of discriminating. But XX chromosomes are pretty representative so let's start there.

Marcy Wheeler on Antonin Scalia's Unlikely But Implicit Strict Originalist Repudiation of the "Personhood" of Corporations

Sun, 2011-01-09 22:48

Good point via

Avedon Carol:

Marcy Wheeler, fascinated by Scalia's ruminations on whether the Constitution protects us from discrimination (he says no), suggests he has clearly just killed corporate personhood: "If the Fourteenth Amendment shouldn't be applied to women and gays, then it sure as hell shouldn't be applied to railroads, right?"

Source: The Sideshow

Or, conversely, if the "original" constitution can be warped to the point that a company can be protected from discrimination, a position I'm confident Scalia has never, not once in his life, ever questioned, then there's no standing for saying it doesn't permit discrimination against women and gays.

Intersection at the Track: Caster Semenya

Thu, 2009-09-10 19:17

Paleoanthropologist and geneticist John Hawks says of the determination that runner Caster Semenya has internal testes…

None of the reports I’ve found say anything about karyotype. The spokesman’s comments raise the question of culpability versus performance advantage. Semenya’s testosterone-fueled development is arguably a competitive advantage over other women. But she’s done nothing wrong; she did not seek out this advantage. Yet girls in many countries diagnosed with internal testes would usually have them surgically removed — would their parents refuse the surgery if it neutralized a possible sports career? What triggers eligibility, anyway?

He said it here.

Notes: Karyotype is the term for chromosomal complement. In other words they’re not saying whether she has XX or XY chromosomes.

There’s not a whole lot of new information about other people with internal testes but I did find a very positive post by Mary Hanan of ABC News about another woman who, like Semenya, learned she had internal testes instead of ovaries as a result of Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome. (The upshot? Whatever her chromosomal sex she’s not a “man.”)

True Diagnosis

[Musician Eden] Atwood is not a freak — nor is she half-man, half-woman. But her DNA says she’s a man. That’s because she has male chromosomes, an X and a Y, instead of two Xs, like most females. It’s a disorder of sexual development in the womb called Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome, or AIS. It can be passed down through the mother or occur as a spontaneous mutation.

“There are probably about seven-and-a-half thousand people, women, in the U.S. with the condition,” said Dr. Charmian Quigley, a pediatric endocrinologist.

Despite the male chromosomes, Quigley said, women with AIS are just that — women.

“They have a vagina, like anybody else’s,” she said, “but it’s basically just a pouch, it’s not connected to a uterus. There is no uterus. But what they have internally is testes that you would typically find in a male.”

It turns out the doctors had lied to Atwood about having twisted ovaries. She really had internal testicles.

Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome

All of us, men and women, have a mix of male and female hormones running through our systems. And as you might expect, the testes of women with AIS produce huge amounts of the typically male hormone testosterone. But here’s the hitch: their bodies can’t process any of it. And amazingly, they turn it into the typically female hormone estrogen, giving them much more estrogen than the average woman.

These women don’t get acne, and have no body odor and minimal sweating. In essence, they are the furthest thing from a male that there could be.

So, why keep it a secret from them? Quigley explained that there was a concept that “if you told them that they had a Y chromosome, or a testicle inside them, but they were externally female, they would completely meltdown.”

She even showed ABC News a 1970s medical textbook that says, “It is of no benefit to disclose that the gonads were testes instead of ovaries.”

It’s a lie doctors have been telling since about 1953, when the syndrome was formally identified. For Atwood, it was the discovery of that lie that shattered her self-image and drove her to sleep with many men in an effort to prove her femininity.

And as for the act of sex, it’s pretty much the same. Women with AIS can have orgasms just like the rest of us. But they say the lies about their conditions can interfere with intimacy and become far more toxic than the actual diagnosis.
Read the quote in context here.

Please note, though, that at least so far no one’s saying what sex chromosomes Symenya has. Nor have they said she has AIS. (If she does have it then it wouldn’t matter how much testosterone her gonads were producing.) Nor are the only possible sex-chromosome combinations XX or XY. And even if she does there can be other factors present.

The Intersex Society of North America has a great FAQ on the many possible combinations, some of which may, or may not apply to Semenya.

One thing the ISNA, and Mary Hanan’s ABC News article, does talk about? The fact that a lot of parents and their doctors know their children’s intersexed status very early on… and the devastating effect of lying to or otherwise keeping your children in the dark can have on them when, as looks like the case with Semenya, the news gets dumped on you in adulthood.

Just sayin’

Conversation on Screen: "The (Sex)abled: Disability Uncensored"

Tue, 2009-09-01 22:15

Laurie Toby Edison of Body Impolitic brings word of a 15 minute student film about a very much overlooked but very important subject.

The (Sex)abled: Disability Uncensored video is a superb discussion on the issues. There is almost no conversation about sex and the disabled in our society, making this and the other work these folks do truly groundbreaking.  It’s powerful, positive, direct and personal.

She said it here.

From the film intro page (which Edison also quotes)

(Sex)abled: Disability Uncensored celebrates people with disabilities as sexual beings.
This new 15-minute student film features participants of the discussion panel sponsored by University of California Berkeley’s Disabled Students Union called “Are Cripples Screwed?” The film also features other Bay area community members and comedian Josh Blue (winner of Last Comic Standing) as they share their personal experiences with sex, dating and intimacy. (Sex)abled reveals that while not everyone will choose to be sexually active, everyBODY is capable of being sexual.

Source: SexSmartFilms.com – “promoting sexual literacy”

Sexuality doesn’t vanish easily. As most will discover eventually, some will discover sooner, and some already know very well.

Case In Point...

Tue, 2009-05-12 18:13

Via Maxwell Hammer of News for Perverts here’s a YouTube version of an ad that’s evidently not being shown in Australia.

Hammer’s take is that Australia is more prudish than America. My take is that prudish or not the male centrism is kind of out of control in the sense that people with really big boobs… even boobs they can’t see their shoes over… tend to have spacial awareness and kinesthetic agility such that they can see… pretty much everything. Especially given that to reach one’s mid-twenties implies that one was once in one’s two’s, three’s, five’s, eleven’s and consequently even if they’d been pubescently precocious they’d have long-since figured out how to see around and over them. Oh, and speaking of seeing, someone cognitively capable of addressing a service person would most likely have seen the platter as it was being set before her and so she would have registered that fries were present even if they were momentarily obscured.

Aww, that’s just me being no fun at all. I know, maybe she’s got short-term memory loss from, say, a stroke, medication, a blow to the head, or maybe a date rape drug like flunitrazepam. Ha ha, wouldn’t that be a riot!

Dang, I’m still not getting into it. I know, maybe she’s a 21st-Century version of Fred McMurray in the Absent-Minded Professor and she’s got her head so wrapped around a problem in the synthesis of amphiphilic block-copolymers it’s a marvel she remembered to order fries at all. Hey, now that would actually be pretty funny.

User login