foreplay

Re: Old Baptist Punchline - "Because it Might Lead to Dancing"

Sun, 2011-10-16 13:35

I'm less sure why "grind" dancing is considered a bad thing. Sure, there's lots of sexual connotations. But...

Except for sweat there doesn't seem to be a lot of sharing of bodily fluids.

Also, this is going to sound old-fogie and out of touch maybe but...

Over time I've noticed that whereas there was a sort of mythology about men's "thrusting" behavior, as contrasted to women's passive receptivity, it's been seeming to me lately that women have their own version of "thrusting" that...

Pretty similar in both motivation and intent.

It's just that attitudes have changed since the 1970s that it's ok to, I dunno, thrust back.

Kate McComb on Letting Our Fingers Do the Walking... and Other Ways to Say It

Wed, 2011-08-24 22:50

Photo by Flickr user spike55151. Cached as a bandwidth-conserving courtesy
Photo by Flickr user spike55151. Used under a Creative Commons license.Photo by Flickr user spike55151. Cached as a bandwidth-conserving courtesyPhoto by Flickr user spike55151. Used under a Creative Commons license.XXXX" class="imagecache-Normal" />

Kate McCombs says

Sometimes “hand jobs” get a bad rap. “Intercourse’s [or a blow job’s] poor cousin,” some people say. And as it applies to women, “fingering,” while an accurate descriptor for some vulva/vagina stimulation activities, evokes a rapid in-out motion of finger-in-vagina, which is insufficient for most women to to experience orgasm. The phrase often invoked to bring some legitimacy to the act, “mutual masturbation,” brings to mind more routine self-pleasure rather than the exchange of delicious, playful climaxes. Despite the negative press, the manual pleasuring of your partner’s sexy bits can be a delightful addition to your sexual repertoire. Variety is, after all, the spice of (sex) life.

Source: Debby Herbenick's My Sex Professor

I'm really not sure why we're so quick to pooh-pooh manual pleasuring, although as McCombs laments, compared to almost every other kind of sex act there are very few euphemisms for it and few of those make it sound either interesting, desirable, or very pleasurable.

Which is a shame because while like pretty much everything else about sex it takes time and practice but, once taken, the results can be elegant, intimate, erotic, and eye-rollingly enjoyable.

I mean, seriously, to the extent we're able to use our hands* is there any limit to the situations our hands can't be central to?  We already use our hands for timid first-time explorations, for gleefully surreptitious mischief, for foreplay, for massage, and for even the most operatic moments of domination and submission.  And as I pointed out years ago in Giving everybody a warm round of (self) applause "let's get over even the faintest fantasy that women's orgasms from hands-free intercourse are 'normal' or 'real' orgasms.  Nor should we forget about using our hands on ourselves to show our partners what we enjoy.  And while we're at it let's remember that very often our partners are able to take their own pleasure seeing, or at least knowing, when we touch ourselves.

And finally, while McComb is careful to point out that there are some illnesses that can be transmitted hand to hand, she also reminds us that while hands are a great way to transmit pleasure to each other, they really are a remarkably safe way to minimize transmitting other things.

Anyway, point is, rather than look at... darn it all I really want more vocabulary for this... rather than look at "manual stimulation" as high-school substitutes for "real thing" activities we should recognize and embrace what we can do with them, in bed and... elsewhere.

* It would be ableist to assume that everybody has uses of their hands.

Photo by Flickr user spike55151. Cached as a bandwidth-conserving courtesyPhoto by Flickr user spike55151. Used under a Creative Commons license.XXXX" class="imagecache-Normal" />

Self-Defeating Masculinity: A Lot of Men Seem to Feel Braiding Hair is Emasculating. Too Bad It's Also Excellent Foreplay

Tue, 2011-05-03 09:58

An un-bylined article in Medical News Today says

Manhood is a "precarious" status-difficult to earn and easy to lose. And when it's threatened, men see aggression as a good way to hold onto it. These are the conclusions of a new article by University of South Florida psychologists Jennifer K. Bosson and Joseph A. Vandello. The paper is published in Current Directions in Psychological Science, a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.

"Gender is social," says, Bosson. "Men know this. They are powerfully concerned about how they appear in other people's eyes." And the more concerned they are, the more they will suffer psychologically when their manhood feels violated. Gender role violation can be a big thing, like losing a job, or a little thing, like being asked to braid hair in a laboratory.

In several studies, Bosson and her colleagues used that task to force men to behave in a "feminine" manner, and recorded what happened. In one study, some men braided hair; others did the more masculine-or gender-neutral-task of braiding rope.

Source: Association for Psychological Science via Medical News Today

What's funny about that study (which all grains of salt small-scale studies should be taken with) is that men felt anxious about their "masculinity" after being asked to braid hair vs. braiding rope.

I don't get that.  Some of the hottest sex I've had with women was after braiding their hair or doing other nominally "feminine" things with them. Now it might not be "masculine" behavior but for some reason (can't imagine why) a lot of women really, really like it when men braid their hair. And not in a "thank you, now I'm ready for church" sort of way either.

Further down in the article Bosson adds

Who judges manhood so stringently? "Women are not the main punishers of gender role violations," says Bosson. Other men are.

It's pretty obvious that most men aren't attracted to "feminine" men the way a lot of women are, and that's fine. But if men really aren't the main punishers of gender role violations" then why should any other man give a crap?

When it comes to a choice of doing things that men think are "masculine" that turn women off, vs. things that men don't think are that "masculine" but turn women on, I'll take the second choice any time. But I think that's mostly because, being heterosexual and liking to get laid, being attractive to women seems like a much better idea.

What am I missing here?

Update: In comments tu quoque points out, correctly, that this post is pretty heterocentric since I focus on gender in terms of getting laid.  Mea semi-culpa.  First because this is primarily a sex blog, but also second because a heck of a lot of ostensible purpose of performing gender revolves around what is and isn't supposed to be attractive to the "other" gender.  And finally because there's a lot of judgment, too often accompanied by ostracism and/or violence, around men who don't perform hetero "masculinity" I'm interested in critiquing both the subject itself and logic underlying the judgment.  Since "being attractive to women," and consequently "getting laid" is supposed to be the gold standard of masculinity I definitely think it's worth pointing out that men appear to be more concerned about masculinity than most women, and that manifestations of that concern (anxiety about braiding hair, for instance, or carrying your wife's fucking purse!) can be outright counterproductive to the goal as stated.

Logical But Not Necessarily Intuitive: Boundaries and Consent Go Both Ways

Sat, 2011-04-16 18:25

Photo by Flickr user robotclaw. Cached as a bandwidth-conserving courtesy
Photo by Flickr user robotclaw. Used under a Creative Commons license.

A reader with the pen name Slap Unhappy asked Em & Lo for advice with the following situation.

My wife and I have been together just over five years. The other night while having sex, she asked me to slap her in the face. Repeatedly. I was raised not to lay a hand down on a woman, and now I am being asked to. We are pretty active and broad in our sexual tastes, but this one is kind of weird to me. Thoughts, ideas?

– Slap Unhappy

Source: Em & Lo

First of all, I recommend reading E&L's response, which is both informative and thoughtful.  But the question brings up another dimension that I don't think is explored often enough.

Back in the late 1970s or early 1980s I ended up breaking up with someone early in a relationship because she wanted me to slap her. It just totally freaked me out. A few years later I was really freaked out when a partner told me she was terribly turned on by spanking.

It wasn’t that I didn’t know about BDSM. In fact I’d done a fair amount of bondage and coercion role-playing. But neither of those partners had seemed the least bit interested — they’d just had previous partners who’d done it to them and they’d discovered they liked it.

My loss in retrospect, and of course theirs too.

What I didn’t understand at the time, and it’s really important for Slap Unhappy too, is that boundaries and respect for boundaries are really important not just to protect the sub, and in more gendered terms they’re not there just to protect the woman.

You’re absolutely right that, especially when we’re turned on, people can withstand far more “impact” than their partners may be psychologically or even physically comfortable giving. (Psychologically as in Unhappy’s and my case where hitting someone went against ingrained upbringing. And physically it often hurts one’s hand more to spank someone than it hurts the spankee’s bottom.)

So anyway, while it might be Unhappy’s partner’s wildest turn on to be slapped, if it’s a turn-off for him then she needs to a) recognize that it’s a boundary issue for him, b) negotiate to see if there’s a way to make him comfortable enough to consent, and if not then c) respect his boundary and his decision not to participate.

Oh, and possibly if he goes ahead anyway then she may also need to d) help work with him through what I’m going to call potential “top drop” afterwards. Because what he might agree to try he might still be bummed about after.

Bottom line: We don’t usually think of boundaries and consent as moving in the direction of the top, or in heterosexual relationships as working towards the man. But boundaries are boundaries and consent is consent and when they’re confronted it’s important that they be respected regardless of who’s boundaries they are or who’s consent is required.

It’s always ok to say no.

The Kinsey Institute on What Condom Reluctance Might Really Indicate... And What to Do About It

Tue, 2010-12-28 23:43

Echidne of the Snakes says

As the Kinsey Institute noted in a study this year, men who can't sustain an erection while wearing a condom are less likely to wear a condom while having sex. (Duh.)

Men who reported having sex with three or more partners in the past three months were almost twice as likely to report erection loss compared with men having fewer partners. These findings underline the importance of encouraging men to discuss condom use with new lovers.

Men who lost their erections were much more likely to remove condoms prematurely, or to report that the condoms broke. Earlier research showed that men who didn't know how to use a condom properly were more likely to report breakage.

Source: Echidne of the Snakes

That sounds about right. Sometimes I've had erection problems with condoms too. Although when that's happened it turns out there are roughly 10,000 other mutually orgasmic heterosexual activities that don't require them. No real reason to obsess about the one or two where they are. And, not to put too fine a point on it, sometimes when you do those things first it turns out you can get a condom on without erection loss.

Who ever said only women need to receive foreplay?

More to the point, who ever said only women enjoy receiving forplay?

Mmmm, foreplay.

If the Utilitarian Value of Sex Was Only Orgasms Why Would We Bother Kissing?

Sun, 2010-08-29 13:42

While reassuring yet another correspondent who’s concerned about being able to… I dunno… perform vaginal orgasms Jessi Fischer of The Sexademic nails the crippling folly of making orgasms the stat-counter of sex. That and the equally crippling trap of distinguishing “foreplay” from the “real thing” of intercourse.

Of course, none of this is to suggest you should toss penetrative vaginal sex off the list of enjoyable sexual stimulation. Kissing may not make you come, but damn it feels good.

She said it here.

There’s so much about sex that feels good. Orgasms? Oh yeah, and woe betide those who arbitrarily decides they’re not necessary for their partners! But if the only point was orgasms then why would anyone ever bother with kissing?

It’s not a trick question. There are plenty of things that feel good about sex, sometimes very good, that don’t* make you come. Kissing is only the most obvious.

* Ok, ok, someone somewhere will always pipe in that THEY are able to come from activity X, Y, or Z. But while that’s obviously wonderful for them, if most people don’t come that way it doesn’t refute the point.

Role-Playing Tips: Plan ahead for a (Bodice) Ripping Good Time

Sat, 2010-06-26 09:57

Little-known sex-related movie trivia: Since the 1970s the movie Last Tango in Paris has been indirectly responsible for a surprising number of minor hip and leg abrasions and pinky-finger strains. The cause? That scene where the Marlin Brando character seemingly-effortlessly rips the panties from the Maria Schneider character.

Like many other things you see in the movies that trick is harder than it looks. In case you’ve ever wanted to try it yourself or with a partner, Cumingirl of the absolutely 100%-accurately-titled blog Christian Nymphos has a completely practical tutorial.

One thing that can be really passionate in the bedroom is having your husband RIP your panties off of you just before you make love.  But sometimes the fabrics are too hard to rip and sometimes your panties are too expensive to throw away!  If you are interested in adding this spice to your bedroom, then listen up to some quick and easy tips that will make it easy for you and your husband!

First off, you need to find some sexy panties (thongs work the best but any kind will do) really cheap.  Make sure that you KNOW they will fit you well, and then buy lots of them.  I found some lacy thongs on sale one time for $1/each.  There were just tons of thongs all thrown on a large display table in the middle of the lingerie dept.  I think I bought 25 or so that day!

Now, once you get home, put a pair on and stand in front of the mirror.  Imagine that you and your husband are making out and you want him to be able to just RIP those panties off of you so that you two can make passionate love!  In order to make it easier for him (and to make sure that he doesn’t hurt you in the process) you need a pair of fingernail clippers or scissors.  A knife will work but fingernail clippers or scissors work better.

She said it here.

I adore the group of authors at Christian Nymphos because it just so head-on contradicts stereotypes about the sexuality of people with profoundly-deep faith, and about people of different abilities and ages. I admire them too because they’re so up front about finding solutions to problems facing women who’s libidos are higher than their husbands who are also very committed to the tradition of marriage. But I digress…

Anyway, I won’t say how I know this but there actually are a couple of tricks to successfully tearing someone’s undies off when they haven’t been prepared first.

The first, most important trick is being able to quickly recognize when not to do it, whether its because they’re too nice, too comfortable, too expensive, or otherwise hard to replace or just because they’re not going to tear. There are more than enough other entirely mutual-mood-enhancing ways to remove underwear so why set your heart on that one particular way, at that particular moment, when you’re not 100% sure it’s going to be 100% pleasing for both of you?

Next tip? It’s a two parter. First part? You weren’t thinking you/he would just walk over, grab the waistband and yank middle-school-wedgie style were you? Didn’t think so! No. Again I won’t say how I know this but like a lot of things related to sex, romance, and role-playing undie ripping works, um, very well indeed after considerable, passionate hugs, burning kisses, strokes, caresses, locked eyes, sultry looks, flared nostrils, and just general all-round exploration… while still mostly clothed. And yes, it takes a little multi-tasking ability but while you’re losing yourself in each other’s embraces you want to reserve enough of capacity for strategic thinking to find seams or other weak points, and, if it looks like it’s a good time, to subtly test, pre-stress, and generally loosen them. That way when the time comes you’ll know where to start and which way to tear.

Next? Again don’t ask how I know but it doesn’t really ruin the mood if you get a tear going from the elastic of a leg band that stops dead at the waistband. As with a lot of role-playing it’s the thought that counts… plus a little deftness. If you do hit an extra-strong seam or binding before the whole garment comes apart just switch to one of those other ways to slip, slide, lower, otherwise get them the rest of the way off while staying in whatever character you and your partner have been playing.

HNT - Massage Table Daydreams

A friend asked us to store a massage table at our house for a day or so. Seemed like a nice opportunity to daydream.

By the way, I’m not sure why massage is supposed to fall under the heading of “vanilla” play. Unless maybe it’s its familiarity as “foreplay” that breeds contempt. But there’s so much more to massage than “candles and a backrub!”

The range of sensations you can create with massage goes from ethereal to enervating, devastating to divine. It requires a great deal of trust in multiple dimensions. A well-designed massage table, even a light one, can easily support an amazing amount of kinetic force, motion, and weight. The right height for massage happens to be the right height for a lot of other activities. They’re designed to resist water, oil, and silicone-based lubricants. And where there are massage tables there’s usually plenty of sheets, towels, heat sources, ice, and privacy. They easily accommodate service or dominance, submission or surrender, and best of all.

Best of all, switching is encouraged. So for the purposes of daydreams… would you rather first give a massage or receive?

Happy HNT (or Half-nekkid Thursday!)





More like this here.

HNT - Inadvertent BDSM opportunities (and Food Issue Special)


Photo by Flickr user Andrew Huff. Used under a Creative Commons license.

Y’know? I’m pretty used to eating spicy food. And I’m pretty used to cooking with spicy ingredients.

So… y’know? If I notice (and I mean really notice! that I forgot to wash my hands before peeing, after after chopping a bunch of serrano peppers for some nice homemade lemon-curry chicken with a side of red-lentil and cabbage dahl…

Let’s just say it’s one of those things one’s partner doesn’t even know she or he should be grateful for that you either rarely cook with peppers and/or meticulously wash your hand afterwards. Or at least before you hop into bed!

And let’s just say sometimes you really want to wash your hands before you pee, m’kay?

Just sayin’

Happy HNT (or Half-nekkid Thursday!)





More like this here.

Kissing Game for Committed, or Casual, Astronomy Buffs

| Tags:
Wed, 2010-04-07 20:02

Kissing game for casual science buffs

While searching for something completely unrelated I stumbled across the EarthSky Meteor Shower Guide for 2010.

Turns out it won’t be the absolute best year for meteor-shower oriented dating — the annual events most likely to produce hundreds or thousands of meteors an hour this year happen while the moon is also prominent (which makes the flashes harder to spot) or else they’ll be peaking too close to dawn to call enchanting-evening material.

And of course in the Pacific Northwest where I live the odds of seeing meteors through the cloud cover can be… uncertain.

That said?

You can usually see a meteor or two every night if the sky’s clear.

And if you’re with someone you love, or maybe just like a lot, then kissing when you see one sounds like a lot of fun.

And if you’re out on some enchanted evening and there are no meteors to be found? Well, does anyone really need an excuse to kiss?

User login