IJNNWACDI

Limbaugh Says Open Marriages Now a Sign of Character for Republicans, Still a Stigma for Democrats

Thu, 2012-01-19 17:27

Kaili Joy Gray of Daily Kos says

Rush Limbaugh, who has been married even more times than Newt, isrushing to Newt's defense:

Now, there's an accusation out there that Newt wanted an open marriage, just like Bill and Hillary. And in fact, Newt even had the politeness to ask permission for it. Do you think Bill ever did that?

Hardy har har. See, even when a Republican cheats on his wife, it's really about Bill Clinton, and how the Most Important Blowjob In HistoryTM was was so much worse. Because, um ... well, because. So there.

Source: Daily Kos

Oddly, while there's no evidence the Clintons agreed to have an "open marriage" there's no evidence they didn't either. Even more odd, back in the 1990s there was certainly plenty of speculation by Rush Limbaugh and the 'winger outrage machine that Bill and Hillary were such out-of-touch west-coast liberals there was such an agreement between them.

It's About Integrity: Democrats Force Weiner Out, Republicans Still Embrace David Vitter's Literally Shitty-Diapered Ass

Thu, 2011-06-16 19:09

Photo by Flickr user Sir Poseyal. Cached as a bandwidth-conserving courtesy
Photo of cocooned, privileged Republican golden (shower) boy Sen. Vitter by Flickr user Sir Poseyal. Used under a Creative Commons license.

Back in 2009 a very nettled Ken Layne clearly thought Louisiana Senator David Vitter ought to resign.

Louisiana sex creep David “Diaperman” Vitter is known for one thing, and one thing only: Hiring hookers and then making those hookers put adult diapers on him, so he can poop in the diapers, for sex kicks. He has been caught employing prostitutes at least twice, in New Orleans and in Washington DC — his number found in the client phone records of the since-suicided “DC Madam,” in the latter case.

Source: Wonkette

I seem to remember saying that if Rep. Anthony Weiner should resign then Sen. Vitter ought to resign too. I didn't think Weiner should resign. But the entire Democratic leadership from President Obama to Nancy Pelosi and pretty much all the way down thought resigning was the right thing to do. And in the end Weiner did just that.

And so, fair being fair, I think it's well past time for Vitter to go.

Going back through the records it sure is hard to find a prominent Republican who was ready to ask Vitter to do what for him really would be the right thing. Take a look at the commenters in this Michelle Malkin post about the Vitter, err, affair back in 2007.

I’m sick and tired of the “holier than thou” crowd of Democrats (and some Republicans) calling for Republicans to resign their office (like Trent Lott over his Strom remark), when NOT A SINGLE DEMOCRAT RESIGNING WHEN THEY GET CAUGHT!

---

In Vitter’s case, he had ALREADY worked it out with his wife...

---

The dems need to take VERY long look at their own ranks before calling for Vitter’s head.

I think Vitter should keep his jopb just long enough to flush out the Dems who are also on that list and who demonize him, and then get exposed…

Line up 3 or 4, and then say “I’ll resign if they do”…

---

I like Vitter. He’s a solid conservative.

This issue is between Vitter and his wife.

It just angers me that the democrats are make out to be clean and pure, but the republicans are made out to be corrupt and untruthful. It’s all BS and media spin. William Jefferson had his freezer full of money and he’s still in the house. You don’t hear the main line media talking about that at all. Keith Obermann is a real slime ball. NBC sounds like the DNC.

Guess what? Like it or not, and I actually kind of like it, the Democrats actually are the party of ethics and integrity. Sucks for Weiner, and it sucks for those of us who aren't really that troubled by the depressingly mild transgressions that led to his forced resignation.

But by and large I prefer their over-caution and priggishness to the 100% support he received from Republican President Bush, and from the Republican Congressional leadership, not to mention the outrageous number of right-wing nominally Christian, nominally family-values Louisiana voters who overwhelmingly re-elected the literally shitty asshole.

Yeah, I didn't think Weiner should resign. But I did say that if Weiner should resign then Vitter should as well.  So...

Ball's in your court, Breitbart. Your integrity's on the line, Malkin. Clock's ticking, Mcconnell. Not that I'm holding my breath for any of them. Because when it comes to hiring prostitutes and cheating on their wives it's not just a matter of "It's Ok If A Conservative Does It," it's not even news.

#%!#@!

Who Cares That Martin Harty Says Eugenics Is Great? He's a Republican. But Margaret Sanger Started Planned Parenthood!

Sun, 2011-03-13 21:49

Jill says

Today's GOP outrage comes from New Hampshire, where a GOP state Congressman advocates the elimination of the mentally handicapped, drug addicts, and the physically disabled: "A 91-year-old state representative told a constituent that he believes in eugenics and that the world would be better off without 'defective people.'"

Source: Brilliant at Breakfast

But don't worry, rather than outright "eliminating" undesirables Margaret Sanger sometimes used eugenics arguments to justify providing birth control to impoverished women who couldn't afford doctors and therefore couldn't get it under the table the way middle-class and wealthy women could so we should all just abolish Planned Parenthood.  Or something.

Of course Sanger did it roughly 91 years ago. And later repudiated it

He's still saying it today. What's his excuse?

Not sure why we don't hear anyone saying we should abolish the New Hampshire GOP since one of their senior members believes the same things.  Mostly I think It's Just Not News When Conservatives Do It.

Update: Turns out even they couldn't stomach the guy (at least not in the still-relatively-liberal New Hampshire GOP.) He's outta there.

Huckabee Didn't Attack Portman Because He's a Fucking Asshole, Instead It's Just Not News When Conservatives Do It

Sat, 2011-03-05 23:18

Photo by Flickr user Wallula Junction. Cached as a bandwidth-conserving courtesy
Photo by Flickr user Wallula Junction. Used under a Creative Commons license.

Dante Atkins says

Mike Huckabee thinks that Natalie Portman sets a bad example for people on account of her unwed pregnancy. Of course! Because as we all know, nobody in their right mind would want to emulate a Harvard-educated, world-famous actress who just won an Academy Award. Maybe if she had been married like that paragon of Christian virtue Britney Spears, things would be just fine.

Source: Daily Kos

Or that even more paragonically virtuous Christian Bristol Palin.  Oh wait!

Oddly, I believe Huckabee actually has a great deal of admiration for a Hollywood star who's firstborn, like Portman's, was conceived out of wedlock.  Enormous admiration.

Clue #1: "Nancy was three months pregnant at the time."

Remember: Why does Huckabee single out Natalie Portman while utterly fucking ignoring it when conservatives do it?  The question positively answers itself.

It's not that, as the usual construction goes "it's ok if you are a Republican" (sometimes abbreviated to IOKIYAR.) It's because, like alcoholism, wife beating, divorce, affairs, teen pregnancy, sexual assault, sex with minors, trolling men's restrooms, hiring escorts, hiring prostitutes, etc., it simply isn't news when a conservative does it because it's so routine.

(Note: Contrary to Huckabee's public position, having a baby out of wedlock when you're financially secure, healthy, not coerced, and have the support not only of your partner but of your community, as Portman is doing, is hardly problematic. Even if, unlike Portman, the prospective mother and father aren't engaged and don't intend to marry.

Twits vs. Substance on Rep. Mark Souder's Affair and Resignation

Wed, 2010-05-19 00:33

Jed Lewison of Daily Kos nicely summarizes the recently announced resignation of extremist “family values” Congressman Mark Souder. One key point? Turns out the “interviewer” in a campaign-related video on the importance of promoting abstinence and chastity was Souder’s non-marital parter.

As you know, I’m usually very harsh about the twits-vs-substance nature of these scandals, where in people enjoy the schadenfreude of a public scold’s downfall for canoodling while missing the larger point. And I’m feeling pretty harsh about this time too because the substantive problem is that Rep. Souder is, or at least was, a major leader and shaper of legislation aimed at preventing precisely the behavior he engaged in. And the nature of his role pretty much implies that he knew, understood, had access to, and a professional as well as personal interest in applying the most current and most effective abstinence-promoting, chastity-keeping, and fidelity-maintaining methods known. And yet knowing what he knew, and having access to what he had, it still didn’t work for him! And so presumably whatever it was he was promoting, and legislating, would almost certainly be even less likely to work for people with less knowledge and less support. You want a scandal? Well that’s the scandal!

One other thing, by the way. One that really does deserve singling out Souder for hypocrisy. Lewison says (emphasis mine)

GOP Rep. Mark Souder of Indiana — the leading advocate for abstinence education in Congress —  will resign after an affair with one of his female staffers became public.

He said it here.

If Souder had had even an ounce of the integrity he doesn’t just demand but also legislates for, he’d have resigned before his affair became public.

See also: Acronym Replacement: It’s Not IOKIYAR, It’s IJNNWACDI (It’s Just Not News When A Conservative Does It)

It's Not News When Conservatives Do It: J.D. Hayworth Edition

Tue, 2010-03-16 10:25

Paul Waldman of TAPPED wrote such a wonderful indictment of the IJNNWACDI tendency towards conservative perversion that I’m reproducing the whole thing here.

Via Steve Benen, we see that former Rep. J.D. Hayworth, who is challenging John McCain in the Republican Senate primary in Arizona, has some interesting ideas about what gay marriage will lead to:

“You see, the Massachusetts Supreme Court, when it started this move toward same-sex marriage, actually defined marriage — now get this — it defined marriage as simply, ‘the establishment of intimacy,’” Hayworth said. “Now how dangerous is that? I mean, I don’t mean to be absurd about it, but I guess I can make the point of absurdity with an absurd point — I guess that would mean if you really had affection for your horse, I guess you could marry your horse. It’s just the wrong way to go, and the only way to protect the institution of marriage is with that federal marriage amendment that I support.”

This kind of thing comes up with alarming frequency from Christian conservatives. For some of them, any issue of gay rights is about sex – — hot, steamy sex, so hot they can’t stop thinking about it. I’ve always said that James Dobson thinks about gay sex more than any five gay people I know put together. And apparently, people like Hayworth think that there is a tide of perversion lapping at our levees, and if we allow a crack in the edifice of heterosexual marriage, it will come down upon us like a tidal wave, drowning us with its forbidden temptations. I wonder what kind of thoughts led them there?

He said it here.

That sounds about right about James Dobson, and one suspects Fred Phelps thinks about it more than every other gay man in Kansas. Any time folks start going into lurid details or taking their proposed prohibitions to extreme lengths there’s gotta be at least a little fire behind all that smoke. Another example, one with almost universally horrific consequences are the white slave-owning men who, while regularly justifying violence against African American men for their “lust” for white women, also happened to have unrestricted and coercive access to African American women. Another example? I always wonder what’s really up when I hear of another regressive state legislator proposing one of those no-exceptions-for-rape-or-incest abortion restrictions. For instance one wonders how long it’ll be before a weeping Glenn Beck upbraids the likes of me for being all nonconsanguino-centerically privileged and just not understanding that, say, Louisiana state legislators deserve grandchildren just like people do. Now I’m forced to wonder whether J.D. Hayworth would support this petition drive... or if he’d change the subject and fulminate about government having no business interfering with private property rights. $%!#%&%

(Quick note, plus attempted guilt expiation for quoting his entire post: I don’t quote Paul Waldman often in this blog but if you’re into politics and social issues TAPPED is a great group blog and you can find a bunch of his other posts here. I particularly appreciated his post Pro-Lifers For More Abortions from yesterday.)

More Evidence That It's Just Not News When Conservatives Do It

Mon, 2010-03-15 13:38

In a news-roundup item BarbinMD of Daily Kos says

Republicans are “quietly asking” if John Ensign (R-NV) can serve effectively in the wake of his sex scandal. You’d think the “family values” crowd would be shouting it from the rooftops … which of course they would be if Ensign was a Democrat.

She said it here.

Remember it’s not so much that it’s ok if you are a Republican (IOKIYAR), it’s that it’s just not news when a Republican does it (IJNNWACDU.) Might as well write stories about dogs biting humans. Pretty much by definition nobody expects morality from conservatives so journalists mostly don’t bother making a big deal out of it when they do.

Acronym Replacement: It's Not IOKIYAR, It's IJNNWACDI (It's *Just Not News* When A Conservative Does It)

Fri, 2010-03-12 09:55

Summary: We all know there’s a double standard where progressive politicians are held accountable for behavior that’s completely ignored when conservatives do it. This post explores the source of that double standard.

So the FBI is investigating allegations that Senator John Ensign tried to pressure a company that was lobbying him into hiring the husband of a woman the Nevada Republican had an affair with. His office dismissed the investigation haughtily. BarbinMD of Daily Kos dryly snarks Ensign’s skin off his back (emphasis mine.)

According to Ensign’s spokeswoman:

“Senator Ensign has consistently acted in an ethical manner to avoid even the appearance of impropriety.”

No word on whether Mrs. Ensign agrees.

She said it here.

Ouch!

Background: Nevada Sen. John Ensign got in a little hot water when he conducted an affair with a campaign employee. He then got in a little more hot water when the employee’s husband (also an Ensign staffer!) discovered the affair and threatened to take the story public. Then he got in a little more hot water by paying the husband quite a bit of hush money out of his parent’s bank account. He now seems to be in considerably more hot water with, for instance, the F.B.I., for possibly suggesting that if a company wanted favors from him they’d have to hire the husband as a consultant.

Actually, unless you follow seriously left/progressive/Democratic bloggers like Barb you may not have heard about any of that. That’s because only sex-and-coverup scandals that really seem to have legs are those of Democrats like John Edwards or Bill Clinton.

There are all manner of excuses bandied about for the seeming double standard. The right-wing noise machine being one, progressive’s peculiarly tone deafness to the importance of public relations being another. Sometimes it’s attributed to the press’s peculiar affection for Republican silverbacks like John McCain. And sometimes (perhaps least improbably) it’s that while the general population and even members of the news industry might be progressive, advertisers, especially major advertisers likely to buy time in major outlets, tend to be very conservative.

Personally I think that for all the narrative about liberals and progressives being the party of Godlessness, Gays, and “Sodom and Gomorrah,” the general public perhaps, well, perversely expects better of Democrats, which makes their misbehavior feel like news. Meanwhile, again for all their talk about sanctity, patriotism, and moral standing it’s… contrary to the lamenting IOKIFYAR acronym (“it’s ok if you’re a Republican”) the real problem is it’s just not news when yet another Republican Senator disgraces himself, when a “homophobic” California legislator turns out to be openly gay, when a “family values” televangelist turns out to be a drug addict or pedophile or to hire male or female prostitutes, or when an “upright” rising star in the Senate turns out to not just cheat on his wife, and not just cheat on his wife with prostitutes, but cheats on his wife with prostitutes who indulge his fetish for wearing diapers. It’s just not news.

Update Oh and this just in the (Republican, naturally) Majority Leader of the Utah House has just admitted that he took a nude hot tub with a 15-year-old. Which might not be an issue (who goes in a hot tub with clothes on) except he evidently took her somewhere to do it, they were alone, and most suspiciously, he paid her $150,000 of hush money. TPMMuckraker caps the post with the IJNNWARD news that “After the confession, lawmakers lined up to embrace Garn and his wife.” Sweet mother of pearl!

Update: Another example from current events. Republican Congressman David Dreier is apoplectic that Democrats are invoking the “deem and pass” procedure that Dreier himself routinely used when his party was in charge. The press and public never peeped when he did it. But look at the interesting outcome if you invoke IJNNWACDI instead of IOKIYAR: it wasn’t news when Dreier did it any more than it’s news when a derelict wino soils himself at a bus stop. But contrary to the backhanded permission-giving of IOKIYAR it’s not ok that they do it. See the difference? Same with the John Ensign vs. John Edwards scandals. It’s not ok that either of them did it… but nobody’s surprised that a conservative did, and therefore it’s just not news.

Incidentally IJNNWACDI also explains why it’s not even hypocritical for conservatives to be upset when progressives do it. Just like the derelict who routinely soils himself in public would be shocked if a doctor or school teacher did it, Dreier, like David Brooks or John Boehner, is shocked because Nancy Pelosi is doing it.

User login