safer sex

Facebook Sex Safety Outreach Experimental Group: "I Have To Be Careful About STDs Because Previous Generations Weren't"

Wed, 2010-03-24 09:51

Jennifer Van Grove of tech-oriented Mashable! raises an eyebrow at claims that Facebook is “responsible” for a 400% increase in syphilis infections in three towns in the U.K.

Director of Public Health Peter Kelly told the Telegraph research points to sites like Facebook “making it easier for people to meet up for casual sex,” and that of the syphilis cases he saw, “several of the people had met sexual partners through these sites.”

The connection between the STD and Facebook seems stretched at best, but the Telegraph also reports, “young people in Sunderland, Durham and Teesside were 25 per cent more likely to log onto social networking sites than those in the rest of Britain.”

Read the quote in context here.

Mmm. One-fourth more likely to log in to Facebook? four times as likely to develop syphilis? It must be true!!!!

Overlooking my initial inclination to mock I’ll instead expand on Grove’s suggestion that maybe institutions in those areas ought to ramp up their sexual safety initiatives by suggesting that… maybe Facebook would be a good medium for getting those initiatives into the eyes of folks who might benefit most.

For instance as a total experiment I’ve just created the Facebook group “I have to be careful about STDs because previous generations weren’t.

If you’ve started or know about other Facebook groups that promote positive sex safety and responsibility you can let me know in comments.

HNT Supplemental: Safe Slurping

Thu, 2008-10-23 13:46

HNT Bonus images. My spam-inspired theme this week was “coffee fetish,” and while I was collecting stuff that would fit with a coffee/3-month-in-bed theme I picked up a couple of extra tidbits for fun.

When I saw the little foil pouches discretely tucked into a drawer** I though just what a responsible fiend would use to practice “safe slurps.” :-)

More from the coffee set here.

I fiddled around with trying to do vaguely phallic-looking things with cylindrical objects but aside from wondering whether vibrations from beans in a blade-style coffee grinder would float anyone’s boat the only thing that came close to working was an old jar of powdered coffee creamer. Tame photo after the fold.

Happy supplementary HNT (or Half-nekkid Thursday!)

[** I mean a kitchen drawer. Sheesh, ya think I’m some kind of preevert? :-) —fl]

Sex safety, like job safety, like food safety, goes with the territory

Fri, 2007-10-12 08:36

Another public service announcement, this time highly related to sex: Sarah of the venerable (and excellent) All About My Vagina has what I think is a wonderful suggestion for

Please call it “sex safety”

It suddenly struck me this week that “sex safety” is an all-round better term than “safer sex.” In some situations, I think terminology is over-emphasized (like the whole vulva vs. vagina thing). But I also know that I would much rather have a pap exam than a pap smear (or as loverman’s sister once said, “if they called it a cunt scrape no one would go”).

I think safer sex, and safe sex before it, are the kind of terms that actually cause problems for themselves. A lot of important, excellent work has been done to research and promote “safer sex,” but I think the simple act of calling it “sex safety” would help smooth the way in the future.

Safe sex sounds like boring rules

Safe sex sounds like limited sex, controlled sex, modified sex. It sounds like one way to have sex, like I’m being asked to have sex in a different, more boring way. That is definitely starting off on the wrong foot…

Safer sex sounds like a runner-up

Safer sex sounds just as oppressive and boring, and as a bonus it sounds like a failure. Oops, it isn’t actually safe; it’s only safe-ish. We were wrong about safe sex, and we don’t know how to make it completely safe anymore…

Sex safety sounds sexy and powerful

Sex safety, on the other hand, sounds like a skill. That’s empowering. Now I’m not being asked to limit my sex with rules, I’m being offered sexual skills. Sexual skills are actually sexy, which is stunning for a health care strategy…

I’ve just quoted snippets. Sarah ably lays out her case here.

It’s a great idea. And about time someone thought of it too. I remember the advent of the term “safe sex.” It was inspired in the aftermath of the first round of HIV, soon after doctors figured out that it was a communicable disease (they weren’t sure at first) and that it was spread sexually (they weren’t sure of that either — for instance they thought maybe the relatively common bath-house stimulant amyl nitrate might have been suppressing the immune system.) And it happened in the face of a real panic, when it seemed that a whole generation the best and brightest in New York, the Bay Area, L.A. and elsewhere were suddenly sick and dying.

That was then. This is pushing 25 years later. As Sarah hints, “safe sex” or the even weaker “safer sex” imply there’s some other kind you might be having. And in the early 1980s “some other kind” was the kind you were having maybe only a few months previously. Today, a generation and change after the initial crisis, calling it “sex safety” puts the emphasis back where it belongs.

We usually talk about driving safety, job safety, food safety, and so on — and sex-gotcha-factor notwithstanding — yet consequences of neglecting food, driving or job safety are often far worse both for ourselves and those around us than neglecting sex safety. But we don’t make special cases out of those because it just… comes with the territory! Time to start thinking the same way about sex.

User login