self image

A Long Answer to the Question "How Can Someone Enjoy Lots of Sex Without Shame?"

Photo by Flickr user Richard Cawood. Cached as a bandwidth-conserving courtesy

So the question over at Em & Lo's "Your Call" this week is "How Can a Woman Enjoy Lots of Sex Without Shame?" Specifically:

How does one go about feeling better about a very sexual personality? I realize I’m human and I accept sex and all that comes with it with open arms. However, our society does not. Obviously I’m not saying I sleep with the masses, but I do enjoy sex and I don’t feel I should have to hide that without being labeled “whore.”

Source: Today on EMandLO.com

I’m going to be a little contrarian here (especially for me) and say rather than be completely open about her sex life she might approach it the way a lot of wealthy people approach conversations about their money: proudly, without embarrassment, but also quietly.

If it comes up in conversation consider being non-defensive but indirect: “I’m just lucky to meet such wonderful people.” “Well, it’s not as big a deal as people say it is.” “I’m sorry, I’ll be busy next weekend.”

You’ll never please everybody and some people are going to be in a snit no matter how one frames it, but for lot of people the resistance lies somewhere their own obstacles and “must be nice” envy. Which is how most people also feel about other people’s financial good fortune. And based on the advice most often given to those with financial fortune, downplaying (without lying or denying) is probably the best way increase comfort levels all around.

---

So I think this approach appeals to me in part because it makes an active sex life normal and unremarkable when there's overwhelming to make it extraordinary and noteworthy. Think about it like other normal and unremarkable things people do a lot of, like canning, golf, contra-dancing, couponing, scrap-booking, travel, and so on. On Monday mornings are you particularly interested in hearing someone else going on and on and on about their particular extracurricular activities?

Chances are that unless you share the same hobby you're going to be somewhere between jealous and bored stiff by a colleague going on and on and on and on about the rave they went to, their hang gliding workshops, their book club gossip, and so on. For all the slavering lather on magazine covers, cable TV programming, and, yes, blog posts, our sex lives just aren't that different from bass fishing or suduko tournaments: fascinating to us because... well... we're fascinated by it, but not really that fascinating to anyone else.

---

Another point along these lines: People are generally quietly tolerant of things like a big appetite for money, sex, or travel, front-row season tickets, or (who knew) 1915 Cracker Jack baseball card collecting they don't like the feeling of having it rubbed in their faces.

---

Final, most important figleaf-approved point: People have a surprisingly strong tendency to project our own disapprovals on others, with the result that, say, we may assume others disapproval is about the amount of sex we're having when instead a) they don't actually care one way or another and we mistake their indifference for disapproval, b) we mistake their wistfulness or envy for disdain, or c) they, again, we mistake their disapproval for getting their nose rubbed in it with disapproval of your sex life. Oh, or d) they actually don't much care for you but that's not why! One way or another we should be careful not to confuse how we think people "probably" feel for how they actually feel unless they tell us directly that, no, that really is what's bugging them.


Tags:

Do Hetero Frames of Reference Contribute to Shy and/or Insulting Attitudes About Receiving Oral Sex?

Writing for the Good in Bed column at Lemondrop, Ian Kerner has a pretty good take on a common anxiety about receiving oral sex. This one’s from a woman but it goes both ways. Here’s the question and the beginning of Kerner’s answer:

[Q] I’m afraid to let a guy to go down on me because I’ve heard men don’t like performing oral sex. Is it true?

[A] This couldn’t be further from the truth. As the author of “She Comes First” (an entire book that’s basically one long ode to the joys of cunnilingus), I can honestly say that the vast majority of men that I’ve spoken with (and I’ve had the chance to speak to thousands of ‘em) take a gung-ho “viva la vulva” attitude when it comes to going down on their female partners.

In fact, many men complain that they’re not the ones with the issue. As it turns out, many women, like yourself, worry that guys don’t really enjoy going down, or you worry that you’re taking too long, or that your smell/taste might be unappealing.

Source: Lemon Drop

I think a more nuanced way to put this is to say that while there are certainly some men who don’t like to eat their partners there are more women who are anxious enough about their partner’s experience of eating them to not enjoy it themselves. And while fellatio’s near-universality in porn creates a buffer I happen to think the same thing is true for a lot of men and fellatio.

This is another one of those intuition-only hunches but I’m curious whether concern about being eaten is more common among heteros. I wonder because I’ve been thinking about frames of reference lately and it seems like it would be pretty easy for a straight person to project their own ambivalence to eating someone of their own sex into an assumption that everyone else (whether male, bi, or lesbian) would share their ambivalence.

I wonder further that self-referencing ambivalence in hetero men accounts for the unfortunate tendency to associate blowjobs with denigration, as in the epithet “cocksucker.” Which for some reason I don’t think is as common either among hetero women or bi and gay men.

As always your thoughts are welcome. I’m not sure what field of study this would fall under (linguistics? psychology? gender studies?) but if you’ve got links or citations I’d love to know more.


Tags:

Hold That Pose... No *That* Pose!


Photo by Flickr user figleaf (hey, that’s me!)

prMac of the technology newswire MacMegasite says

Vancouver, BC – PhotographyTips has released its first guide for posing female models for iPhone users, entitled “Poses Volume 1: The First Female Collection.”

“This product will be welcomed and embraced by photographers who use iPhones or the iPod touch, and who have a need to attractively pose female subjects,” said Dan McCormick of PhotographyTips.

Poses Volume 1 contains 368 individual color images of attractive, popular poses that any model can quickly and easily adopt. The application has a unique ‘Fit Pose’ feature that assists in getting the subject’s pose to closely match any professionally-posed example from the application. ...

“This practical guide will solve any photographer’s posing problems once and for all,” said McCormick, “whether photographing a girlfriend at the beach who may never have posed before or a professional model in the studio. It’s easy to use, and a superb posing resource that photographers and models will call upon over and over again for years to come.”

Read the quote in context here.

The volumes 2 and 3 are forthcoming. It’s possible the other two volumes will have poses for men and, I dunno, children or something, but I get the strong impression it’ll be another 736 (for a total 1104) ways to pose women.

Actually though this is pretty interesting. One of the nice things about professional, semi-professional, and amateur photography on the internet (erotic and otherwise) is you see enough images that you start to recognize a certain grammar… and organization… to poses that becomes more stylized cliche´ formal based largely on the experience or training of the photographer.

Even more interesting are digest or excerpt sites that pick out “best of set” photos for reuse on their own sites. If you follow their links to the original photo sets you’ll often see the photo in question isn’t necessarily the “best” content-wise (you might see as much of the subjects, you might see as much of the backgrounds, you might see pretty consistent proportions, focus, color, etc.) but instead “best” fits into one of the (evidently 1104 for women) ways to pose.

It’s not just human photography, obviously. You’ll see it in car and airplane photos, sports photography, food, and even LOLCats.

Anyway, it’s kind of good to see that past some level there really are, literally, templates for posing people.

Update: See also Scott Adam’s Rules of Art.


Tags:

Letting O-Face Imperil O-Space


Photo by Flickr user Mushroom boy. Used under a Creative Commons license.

Know how when you were a kid at some point you were sitting somewhere totally engrossed in a book, or game, or movie, or especially just daydreaming... just 1,000 miles away in your own world anyway... and someone, probably a grownup, would come by and say something like "sit up straight, honey, that can't be good for your back/neck/posture/whatever?" Or maybe they just said "at least close your mouth so the flies don't get in?" And even just dropping out enough to assess what they said, let alone sit up, or fly right, or close your mouth was usually all it took to knock you out of the dreamy, timeless place you'd been? And do you remember how much work it usually was to get back? Or that by the time you were back you'd slid back into whatever posture you'd been upbraided for, or your face had gone completely slack again? Funny how trying to please someone else's idea of how you should look when you're having a good time pulls you... right out of that good time.

Gwen of Sociological Images says

Brianna S. mentioned to me that the December issue of Cosmo has an article about whether you're making an attractive face when you orgasm. I googled "Cosmo make face orgasm," and found an image of the cover (notice the big "Your Orgasm Face" tagline next to one of Jessica Simpson's boobs) and a discussion of the article at Jezebel:

The implication ("What he's thinking when he sees it"), of course, is that if you're not careful, you might make an unattractive face while you orgasm, and that your male partner (because who cares what women's female partners think?) will be put off by it. It's female orgasm as performance. Cosmo is reminding us, in case we forgot, that a woman's sexual pleasure isn't really about her. Even while having an orgasm, she needs to be sure she looks attractive.

I can't help but think that if you're anxiously trying to monitor your facial expression, it might get in the way of you getting to have an orgasm at all. I wonder which would be preferable, then: having a real orgasm but with an ugly orgasm face, or faking an orgasm but making sure your face is under control.

Read the quote in context here.

This seems like a pernicious influence of porn, but even more so (and going way further back) of conventional movies, where a) the people on camera are nothing but trying to look their best for the camera. And if, as sometimes happens in porn, they actually are in "the zone" as when male performers are trying to perform a "money shot" the directors and camera operators direct the attention away from the often-necessarily-slack "O-is-for-effort" face.

Which is sort of a tragedy when you think about it. Because teasing a partner about his or her "O-face" isn't just knocking them out of their, well, O space(!!!) it's also totally deprecating the skill and effort you've put into helping them have one! And because being too self-conscious about your own O-face" isn't just knocking you out of or keeping you out of your O-space, it's deprecating the skill and effort your partner puts into helping you build it.

And seriously, this isn't about being afraid to cook because the kitchen might get dirty -- for most people cleaning the kitchen, however delicious the meal, is still a chore! It's more like being afraid to put cinnamon rolls in the oven for fear they might become puffy, and brown on the top, and sticky/gooey/bubbly on the bottom, and smell heavenly melted-buttery, and incredible tasting.

In other words it's about learning to get that our O-faces, and our partners', means things are happening perfectly.

---

Hmm... there's obviously more to it than this but... I wonder how much of people's often very real enjoyment of rear-entry positions has something to do with not having to worry about revealing O-faces, with the result they're better able to just let go and enjoy themselves. I'm guessing probably not much but... well some people really do go home after sex rather than sleep with their partners for fear of being seen with "morning face."


Tags:

Perspectives On Personal Perception P'HNT P'just P'because.

In the last chapter of Bonk: The Curious Coupling of Science and Sex, Mary Roach discusses Masters & Johnson’s perhaps deservedly little-known final research project, Homosexuality In Perspective published in 1979.

Roach points out that the study was somewhat deprecated because half M&J devoted the second half of the book to, um, misguided strategies for helping gay and lesbian people “turn straight.” The first half of the book, however, Roach says, is pretty interesting.

One tidbit that I’d think would have been worth the price of the book (Masters and Johnson’s I mean, Roach’s book is priceless) relates very nicely to the tradition of Osbasso’s Half-nekkid Thursday and issues of body consciousness in general. I highlighted the key pieces in the third paragraph.

For five years, Masters and Johnson observed and compared the laboratory sexual encounters of straight, gay and lesbian, and “ambisexual” couples. (The team coined the term to refer to nonmonogamous sexual opportunists who show no preference between men and women throughout their very busy sex lives.)

...

While some of the subjects were having sex with their spouses or long-term partners, others were doing it with a stranger — not a stranger of their choosing, but one assigned to them by masters and johnson. These latter men and women would show up at the lab, chat with the researchers, and, following a short orientation session, get down to business with a man or woman they had never laid eyes upon. While Masters and Johnson observed.

...

The team did mention that many of the men and women who had been assigned a partner worried that this person wouldn’t find them attractive. Oddly, the reverse anxiety never surfaced — no one seemed concerned about whether they themselves would feel any attraction to the strangers whose genitals they were about to experience in almost every way imaginable: manually, orally, coitionally.

Source: Bonk, pg. 298-299

Pretty wild when you think about it, right? Everyone worries more about how they look than how their prospective partners — even drawn out of a hat partners! — will look. It’s certainly borne out when you look at all the thousands of Thursday photos folks have posted over the last three years — how the harshest criticism, and the biggest trepidation, has almost invariably been from the poster him or herself… and from the occasional, random, and pretty-obviously-flame-seeking troll.

While it’s not actually related, I’m a bit embarrassed by my wrinkly/baggy clothes. Turns out, though, I’d have been even more embarrassed if they were tighter and neatly pressed. :-)

Happy HNT (or Half-nekkid Thursday!)


Tags:

User login