sex 2.0

The Art of the Takedown: Lessons for Knee-Squeezing Twits

Responding to a knee-squeezing podcast from ZDNet about technology at Sex 2.0 Sabrina Morgan of Sabrina in Stockings left a pretty brilliant comment

Thanks for mentioning my session, although I’m not sure what was behind the case of the giggles as soon as the term “sex” came up. I’m sure you share my understanding that CRM software is a set of useful tools; CRM itself is a mindset and a way of running your business. Sex work as a personalized service industry is no different.

Some of the first and longest-running podcasts were sex podcasts (Open Source Sex, Bedroom Radio, and Whorecast come to mind). At a conference focused on the intersection of sex, technology and feminism, Ellie and Nobilis’s Podcasting 101 panel was a perfect fit.

As far as getting free attendance as an analyst – good luck with that one. Most of the attendees were sex/tech/culture analysts and paid regardless. The conference was inexpensive to begin with ($40 for last-minute tickets); if you were interested in attending the event for free, volunteer refunds and scholarship tickets were available.

Read the quote in context here.

Taking it to their professionalism rather than taking it personally isn’t just a good idea in general, it’s got to have hurt. “I’m sure you share my understanding of CRM...?” Ouch! Reminding commercial podcasters that they weren’t there first? Ouch again. And suggesting that if the $40 for “analysts” (who hadn’t bothered to analyze the conference $30 early registration fee) was too pricey they could volunteer or request scholarships? That too.

Even better twist? In Twitter she twisted the knife with just 132 razor-sharp characters.

I can’t be offended. They managed to get my name right, promote #sex20, make us sound interesting and make themselves look immature.

Nice work!

Rough Notes from Cunningminx's "Internet Famous / Conference Shy" Session at Sex 2.0

Here are my rough, non-verbatim notes from Cunningminx’s excellent ice-breaking presentation “Internet Famous / Conference Shy.” The notes are necessarily incomplete during audience-participation sections. Finally, because I arrived a few moments late I missed part of the introduction.

Language note: Minx uses the ominous-sounding term “stalking” in the OKCupid sense of being interested in or curious enough about to want to know more about or to meet someone you know only online. (In real stalking there’s obviously no such thing as “stalking politely.”)

First, here’s the session description from the 2009 Sessions page.

Are you great on a keyboard, but overwhelmed by the time you get to the registration desk? Are you charming on Twitter but glued to the wall at the opening night party? Sometimes internet abundance doesn’t translate well to having a great time at that conference. From wildly famous sexperts to curious wallflowers, from keynoters to first-time guests, conference experiences might not easily translate from the keyboard. Find out how, with just a little preparation, you can have the best possible experience at your next con.

Session leader: Cunning Minx

How do you stalk politely?

  • Check blogs and their other sites
  • Leave comments
  • Follow twitter
  • Google for other social-media connections

Be organized

  • make a list of who you want to see
  • and what you want to talk about with them
    • name/alias
    • organization
    • blog/twitter topics
  • recent events attended

What can I do to be stalkable/open?

  • Write best work before the event (most interesting to/about you)
  • Be yourself, be interesting
  • Reach out via blog, podcast, Twitter
  • Use the event #hashtag for Everything
  • Blog/Twitter about folks you do know
  • Find out/ask who’s going
  • What you’re excited about

Join the conversation

  • Mailing list
  • Listen first — take a week to listen to what others are talking about, so you know what is and isn’t… topical.
  • Answer questions (if you really know)
  • Ask questions
  • Post a pic to Facebook group
  • Post to Facebook wall
  • Continue interesting conversations with individuals off list
  • Be a real person

Mailing list don’t

  • Don’t use as a dating service

As you pack

  • Make sure you’ve got all your equipment with you
  • Including chargers and cables
  • And extra batteries
  • On the other hand, asking to borrow a power cord is a great ice-breaker
  • Bring fresh business cards w/ name/pseudonym, TwitterID, blog, cell-phone or texting
  • Backup your laptop
  • Give current partner some loving

During the conference

  • turn twitter notices on mobile device
  • be stalkable
  • be your “party self”
  • Post about all the fun you’re having
  • If you show faces do a pod/vidcast
  • audioboom.com [Couldn’t find working link. —fl]

Starting a conversation

  • Statement
    • I just went to…
    • This is my first…
    • Disclosure about yourself (“I” statement)
    • I think…
    • Invitation (opportunity for them to say)
  • What do you think about…?

Conversation Starters

  • Which session are you going to?
  • Oh, I missed that, how was it
  • Going anywhere for dinner (be specific
  • What do you do at XXX
  • How did you find out about YYY
  • Did you see the season finale of ZZZ? (Battlestar Galactica, good example — kind of random, good break-out-of-conference-mode question.)

Say what you want

  • I’d like to present/scene with you tonight (Can’t get what you don’t ask for — they’re not telepathic)
  • I’d like to get to know you better
  • I’d love to hear you scream
  • Point being — get it out there out loud so they can respond

Practice believing in yourself

  • If you get emo get yourself out of it by… asking/outreach to pull yourself back into “party” space
  • Say fears out loud
  • “Egging on” exercise — you vent, they agree instead of saying “oh no.” Point is you can end up laughing about it instead of resisting their resistance.

Take care of yourself

  • Adopt a policy of
    • Trying new things
    • meeting new people
    • having new experiences
    • no regrets (you won’t enjoy everything you try, e.g. the 9-star tofu faux chicken-liver appetizer everyone else at dinner said they liked.)
  • Decide you will kick ass

Sex 2.0 and Galvanic Responses

Really nice writeup of Sex 2.0 by Miriam Perez at Feministing. She concluded with

One of my favorite quotes from the weekend:

Ricci Levy, Woodhull Freedom Foundation Executive Director

“Imagine a country where you are just as comfortable talking to people about sex and what you like as you are talking about chocolate. That would be what sexual freedom would look like.”

Miriam said it here.

The quote caused a bit of a ruckus among commenters. Some said Ricci was trying to sexualize everything. Others complained chocolate has become a plaything of the rich.

I thought a post from Lisa KS from Punkassblog.com, who also attended, might put the Levy quote in a more affirmative perspective.

“I didn’t notice for quite a while that I wasn’t being stared at like usual. Not til I went outside briefly and found myself being whistled at and ogled by two men walking past me on the street. That woke me up, as it usually does, and when I went back inside the hotel where the conference was being held, when I looked around, I found that really nobody was looking at me much at all. ... It was pretty awesome.”

Lisa said it here.

The point being Ricci wasn’t saying “ooh wouldn’t it be cool if everybody could just talk about acculturated obsessions with dessert 24 hours a day.”

And not to sound nettled but to have jumped to that conclusion is to be no different from the two cat-calling passers by outside the conference site: so indoctrinated by the culture of sexualization they can’t tell they’re being rude.

For the record I was reminded by another commenter, Miriam, that food and sex are such excellent joint metaphors that they tend to produce “gotchas” when used as analogies for each other.

So had it been me I might have instead said “Imagine a country where you are just as comfortable talking to people about sex and what you like as you are talking about bicycles.”

Because whether one has one bike, or many, or none it’s unremarkable! And thus not likely to draw judgmental, uninvited, unwelcome, out of context, and/or appropriating remarks from passers by on sidewalks or online. Which was, of course, Ricci Levy’s point.

Rough Notes from Maria Diaz's "Revenge Porn" Session at Sex 2.0

At Sex 2.0 blogger Maria Diaz presented a session on “Revenge Porn.” Here are my rough, non-verbatim notes taken live during the session. Update Calico has posted video transcripts.

Initially inspired by hassles faced by Gretchen Rossi of a TV show called “Real Housewives of Orange County”

  • Ex boyfriend started to post photos to thedirty.com after the show aired
  • She doesn’t talk about it but she’s attempted legal action against the website

So! What is revenge porn?

  • Photos or images distributed by someone in an attempt to humiliate the subject; sometimes includes contact info
  • First used on urbandictionary in 2007
  • (Comment: For sex-industry people may not be photos but might be contact info)

Reason for the talk

  • People are sharing more pictures and other personal information than ever.
    • Not just for world but peer group
  • Solution has to be more realistic than “never take naked photos or otherwise do anything else that could ever get online ever.”

Different flavors of revenge porn

  • Celebrity sex tape
  • Scorned ex who distributes tapes to world or to friends
  • Faux revenge professional porn
  • The Revenge Porn threat (blackmail) “Do what I want or I’ll release the photos

4 Cases

  • Lena Chen (formerly of Sex and the Ivy blog)
    • Outed in photos by disgruntled ex
  • Kim Kardashian (Public celebrity)
  • Carrie Prejean (Miss California)
    • Carrie Prejean was outed as revenge for homophobia… but still was outed and it was still revenge
    • Jason Fortuny (with a twist)
    • Posted respondents to his “violent craigslist” prank
  • Imagined he was in the clear but wound up losing court battle

Maria Diaz asked: Why do outed celebrities’ seem to suffer less career-wise (but not suffer less personally)

  • Guess: Probably papparazi influence

Question: Why the market for humiliated/revenge-upon-ed wives, husbands?

  • Opportunity to look down on someone
    • “At least I don’t have naked photos of me…”
  • Eroticizing shaming/prudery
  • Justifying/viewing “object lesson” participation
  • How people think about women (has to do with why it’s almost always women.)
  • Not much stigma for men because (no-sex class moment here) it’s expected that men will “debase” themselves. It might happen that they’re outed but it’s not “news.”

Question: With everyone growing up with phonecams, etc do you think it’ll ever reach a point where someone won’t have to resign or won’t be hired if outed?

  • Probably so. There’s often little lasting damage now
  • There is a control issue. Sex bloggers (e.g. Lena Chen) who post their own photos still felt hurt and betrayed when an partner does it against their wishes

Maria: Problem with Jason Fortuny and other revenge/stalking cases is there were, or are, no real laws.

Point: Revenge porn ought to be treated as internet stalking
Downside: law enforcement may not be prepared/motivated to enforce stalking in the first place

Point: saturation of millions of “yeah I did that too” takes power away from straight-up revenge. Saturation doesn’t protect in Fortuny-type “craigslist respondent” outings

Point Saying “If you have to do it… lock it down, get “collateral,” is implicitly agreeing it’s wrong. Saying “it’s the worst thing” is only an issue if it’s really the worst thing!

Possible “fight fire with fire” Strategy:

  • Cuts both ways
  • Out people who post revenge porn.
  • Saturation may protect victims (I mean, at some point it’s going to become “so what”) but it’s unlikely to protect perpetrators.
  • At some point in the future we’ll be blazé about being naked on the internet…
  • But! At no point are we ever likely to be unconcerned about assholes who out people.

Revenge-Porn "Revenge" Strategy

This post is about an effective way to deal with people who post sexually “incriminating” information about others against their will: outing the posters so that their future employers, partners, and customers find out when they Google them.

On Saturday at Sex 2.0 Maria Diaz gave a presentation on “revenge porn” “Revenge porn” is the umbrella term for the act of distributing information about a person’s sexual nature against the victim’s wishes, but it’s most closely associated with posting nude photos taken before a relationship ends as a way of getting back at an ex.

One of the big concerns for victims is that even if they get redress from perpetrators… or even if the perpetrator genuinely regrets their decision, once information goes into circulation it can’t be recalled.

One potential bright spot is that as more, and more, and more people “grow up online” and as more and more people’s photos end up in distribution (either involuntarily or voluntarily) we can expect to reach a certain saturation level such that the existence of such photos won’t be scandalous at all. (In 1984 the discovery of years-old nude photos of Vanessa L. Williams obliged her surrender her position as Miss America. Some years later the disclosure of far more sexual photos of rabid right-wing radio host “Doctor” Laura Schlessinger raised eyebrows but caused no lasting damage. Just recently the discovery of photos of controversial figure Carrie Prejean have caused scarcely a ripple. (Compared, at least, to her genuinely scandalous, but unconcealed homophobia.)

Odds are that it won’t be that long before such photos won’t derail a Supreme Court nomination.

That will be then, however. This is now. And now, for whatever reason, not only do people feel embarrassed and threatened when a former partner posts photos, they also face potential discrimination from future partners, colleges, and employers during routine background searches.

So what to do?

Well, Google and background checks cut both ways. If Google can turn up “incriminating” photos indicating that, like the entire rest of the population, one has a pee-pee and an inclination to do things that feel nice with them, well? Google can also turn up information on the assholes who think it’s fun, funny, or “revenge” to post them.

And you know what? Whereas a “saturation” effect may protect victims in the future it’s extremely unlikely that future employers, partners, journalists, or biographers will ever be pleased when they turn up evidence that a candidate has posted such photos.

“Youthful indiscretion” is almost by definition a transitory phenomenon that, again almost by definition, has no bearing on one’s likely future performance. “Being an asshole,” on the other hand, can be a little more… indicative. (For instance it’s very likely that no matter what he does in the years between, 30 years from now Jason Fortuny’s odds of a supreme-court nomination will be approximately what they are now: zero.)

So to the extent you can’t recall photos posted on the internet I’d like to suggest making it just as difficult to recall the information identifying the individuals who posted those photos.

Yes, I’m aware that many victims would prefer the incident be forgotten as quickly as possible rather than dredged up again in the future. That’s obviously fine. But not every victim will feel that way. And, really, it only takes a few to create a laudable “chilling effect” on other would-be perpetrators.

Jennifer Lyon Bell's "Matinee," Cinekink Award Winner in Best Short Narrative Category

One of the evening activities after Sex 2.0 (Twitter tag #sex20con) this evening was a screening of award-winning porn, including Matinee, directed by Jennifer Lyon Bell, from the Cinekink 2009 event. Here’s a synopsis of Matinee from Cinekink

Actors Mariah and Daniel play lovers every night, but their onstage romance lacks spark. One slow afternoon, they discover that today’s matinée performance will make or break both of their careers. Daniel wants to make big changes, and Mariah starts to wonder: are Daniel’s suggestions reasonable? Or has he lost track of the boundary between actor and character? Rushed to the stage, in front of a live audience, they must figure it out together.

They said it here.

I came in late and, because the room was very crowded, I didn’t stay long. And so I don’t know much about the premise or plot. But the one sex scene I saw was in my opinion a real eye-opener.

The female lead leads! Every step of the way she’s the active party. The point of view focuses on both of them but she’s the one doing the foreplay, stroking him hard, eating him, unwrapping the condom, pulling him toward her, guiding him into her. Even when he’s on top she’s actively moving up against him as much as he’s moving into her.

They separate before either of them come. She climbs on top of him. He holds himself this time, but more to hold himself steady as engulfs him. Once they’re joined he leans back and she moves. As she gets more excited she reaches down and rolls her own clitoris.

Again they stop before either of them come. She rolls back. Their hands join over her vulva. He strokes her to a well-acted but persuasive rather than porn/theatrical orgasm. Rather than jump to the next scene there’s a really nice enactment of the pause for “aftershock” care.

There were a lot of highly non-vanilla people present and I didn’t think the film was well received (they may have just been really rowdy, or else perhaps the into scenes, which I didn’t see, were unbearably hokey.) But I thought from a gender-role perspective its hetero/vanilla veneer made it all the more transgressive. She put the condom on him even before she began to eat him. The pace and tempo was in regular-intercourse tempo rather than the conventional hyper-porn bippity-bippity-bip pace that, I think, is pitched more for the tempo of male masturbation. There was no money shot. No calling anyone a bitch or grimacing out “give me your fat rutabaga you big stud.” At least while I was there she came and he didn’t. In fact except that there was nudity, PIV penetration, and couple of porn-style moans and groans it missed most of the tropes I remember driving me to give up on video porn.

That last bit is kind of interesting: any bumpkin in porn can cough out a money shot, and many do. The standard routine is, roughly, that the director gets all the shots he or she needs, all the positions, acts, and angles, and then they stop everything re-arrange the shoot, and the actor stands or kneels and quickly wanks out an ejaculation. Usually on somebody else’s body or face. Whee! Just how I always want to finish when I have sex (but, to be fair, it probably helps the target-male customer identify since at that point he’s probably masturbating too.) What’s different about Matinee is that she has the “money shot” using only his hands — considerably more difficult even for porn actresses to produce in male actors (given how rarely they do it instead of him.)

An important point that I probably wouldn’t have picked up on if I hadn’t been watching with other, perhaps more porn-savvy viewers: I get the impression is more of a masturbation aid than representative sex. And so, I think, maybe the stylized, 7-minute naked-step-aerobics of “real” porn is more effective for people who use it to get off than the stuff regular people do. (Sort of like you might enjoy seeing a whole top-chef episode worth of effort to prepare your meal even though you probably wouldn’t want to cook under that kind of pressure yourself every evening.

But by and large? Although personally I like a little more turn-taking when I have sex it was all in all the kind of slow comfortable, cuddly, orgasmic screw I’d thoroughly enjoy spending a matinee-long afternoon doing with a partner.

Anyway, cool scene in what looked like a cool movie. (The Cinekink jury evidently agreed. They gave Matinee the award for best narrative short.

Product Review by Proxie: BadInfluenceGirl on "Female Condoms"

Learn something new every day.

At dinner at the Sex 2.0 conference I learned from Bad Influence Girl, who writes sex-toy reviews and erotic reveries, that…

Female condoms,” the kind of sleeves that are inserted vaginally instead of rolled onto the penis as with condoms for men, are cooler than I’d been led to believe.

  • First, they’re great for women who’s partners have difficulty getting or maintaining erections. That would include those who loose steam while putting on condoms, sure, but also for those who have difficulty getting or maintaining full erections at all.
  • Next, they’re nice because they make initial entry, the kind involving a lot of nice, cooperative bumping and sliding and aligning when you’re not using your hands, feel more natural.
  • Oh yeah, and most of them are polyurethane or nitrile polymer instead of latex, which is not only great for people with real latex allergy-allergies, but for people who’s skin is irritated by that kind of squeaky friction you get even when you use lube.

Anyway, that’s actually pretty cool to hear about. The operative language about condoms in general, and condoms for women in particular, is that the language used to discuss them is often highly… operational. Yes, they give women control, especially in the sense of women who’s partners selfishly refuse to use condoms themselves. And yes they provide roughly the same protection regular condoms to (more in the case of so-called “bikini condoms” since they offer more protection from skin-to-skin transmission of, say, perineal or scrotal herpes; some of the earlier versions provided less protection; like regular condoms they can be difficult to learn to use properly.)

But… BadInfluence wasn’t talking about the pragmatics, she was talking about what made them more enjoyable, for her, than male condoms.

Your mileage may vary but if you use condoms with a second form of contraception and, especially, if you or your partner has erection problems, you might enjoy checking them out.

Sex 2.0 Unconference Press Release

I’m really looking forward to attending the second Sex 2.0 conference in the Washington, D.C. area early next month. Here’s the press release.

WASHINGTON, D.C. – April 27, 2009. Now in our second year, Sex 2.0, a one-day unconference, will take place on May 9, 2009 in Washington, D.C. Sex 2.0 will focus on the intersection of social media, feminism, and sexuality. How is social media enabling people to learn, grow, and connect sexually? How is sexual expression tied to social activism? Does the concept of transparency online offer new opportunities or present new roadblocks — or both? Sex 2.0 is an unconference, which means that sessions will be informal conversations organized by people attending the event. Session leaders with some knowledge in a subject area facilitate conversations among the participants.

Sessions will include: “Internet Advocacy for Sexual Freedom” with Ricci Joy Levy of the Woodhull Foundation; “Polyamory in Media’s Spotlight” with Anita Wagner; “Craigslist Red, Craigslist Blue: Why we should dismantle the “internet red light district” with Melissa Gira Grant and Joanne McNeill; “Kick Ass Twitter Apps” with Cunning Minx; “Revenge Porn” with Maria Diaz; and “Sex Writing Beyond Erotica, Beyond Porn” with Jack Murnighan, Nerve.com editor-at-large. The keynote speaker will be Nikol Hasler, creator of the Midwest Teen Sex Show (http://midwestteensexshow.com). A complete list of sessions may be viewed at: http://sex20con.com/2009-schedule/sessions/

Sex 2.0 will be held in a Washington, D.C. hotel. (To ensure everyone’s privacy, location information will be email once you are registered). It will offer five conference rooms, a lounge (with free WiFi), vendor area as well as space for various sex-positive outreach groups to set up informational displays and tables.

The event is managed by volunteers and funded by sponsors. We are pleased to have SEXTOY.com as our presenting sponsor this year. SEXTOY.com has been focusing on building a relationship within the blogger community with the recent start-up of its sex toy reviewer program. SEXTOY.com is honored to be the official sponsor for Sex 2.0 and looks forward to a mutually rewarding relationship with the blogger Community. Two SEXTOY.com associates will be attending Sex 2.0 this year: Erik Van Riper and Domina Doll; who both look forward to meeting everyone, attending the talks and participating in discussions. Sex 2.0 is also pleased to have community sponsor Bound Not Gagged (www.boundnotgagged.com), hospitality sponsor Kimberleecline.com and technology sponsor PosAlt.com supporting this years conference.

While the event itself is on Saturday, May 9, there are participant-organized meetups, outings, and parties being planned for Friday night and Saturday evening, as well as a Sunday brunch. For more information, visit the Sex 2.0 website at www.sex20con.com or follow us on Twitter at twitter.com/sex20con.

Source: Press Release

The workshops all look interesting. Some of the ones I’m particularly looking forward to include “The Evolution and Democratization of Sex Writing,” “Gender & Technology: How technology influences hegemonic sexual awareness and vice versa,” “Sex Writing Beyond Erotica, Beyond Porn.” And obviously, and especially, “Internet Famous but Conference Shy?”

If you’re going to be there I look forward to either meeting you or seeing you again.

Syndicate content