sexual fantasies

Scott Meyer's Basic Instructions Broaches a Taboo Crackpot Theory: Sex on the Moon

Sun, 2010-09-26 22:25

I like Scott Meyer’s Basic Instructions comics quite a bit. He’s a relocated local, the central premise relates to my old field of instructional design. And how advice-column premises correspond to what actually prompted the question. Plus this one’s about sex, heteronormativity or possibly naivete, and/or not necessarily responding to turn-ons or fantasies that aren’t your turn-ons or fantasies.

Basic Instructions - "How to React to a Crackpot Theory"- Scott Meyer - Copyright 2010-09-26

That plus some wonderfully juvenile-humor-shaped puns.

A Different Take: Cuckoldry as Sexual Fantasy

Mon, 2010-06-21 11:50

Following up on my previous post on the urban mythos/pathos of cuckoldry, Razib Khan mentioned another group besides the furiously bitter “I poked her so I should own her” MRA crowd that’s evidently fascinated with misattributed paternity.

Yes, I’m making a normative assumption here that if you’re male you should be displeased if you find out that children whom you assumed were your biological offspring turn out not to be. If, on the other hand, you think it’s fun and adds more zest to your life, you’re just kind of weird. Sorry if I sound prejudiced, but I know that the cuckold community is going to link to this post, so I’m hoping you guys don’t start leaving angry comments for disabusing you of your fantasies, as has occurred before when I post on this.

Value judgments notwithstanding it’s interesting that people are kinked about cuckoldry and/or “hot wife” fantasies would have challenged Khan in previous posts. And without casting judgment of my own I’m fairly mystified by that particular fetish. Nancy Friday gave the fetish an entire chapter back in the 1980s in her book of male fantasies Men in Love. She took brief but unpersuasive crack at an explanation. I think it might have something to do with the male worthiness trap, where the idea that a partner’s interest in someone else holds out promise that she might be interested in one’s self. But I dunno. If you’ve got insights and/or experience comments are open. I’m all ears.

Vampires and Gender Inside the No-Sex Class Paradigm

Sat, 2008-11-22 13:36


Photo by Flickr user stephentrepreneur. Used under a Creative Commons license.

Olvlzl of Echidne of the Snakes makes such a great point about the whole vampire fetish

The idea of a man slipping into a woman’s bed room at night and vampirizing her as romance might be less sick than the romanticizing rape only due to the fact that vampires don’t exist. At least I hope there aren’t kids trying out biting people in the neck as a lifestyle choice, now that Hollywood is presenting the blood sucker as a white bread teen idol. I just don’t get it. But then, I never got The Leader of the Pack either. I haven’t done a study of it, but I’ll bet that female vampires preying on males are not generally portrayed as sympathetic, romantic characters. They might be seductive but they the ones I recall are only the more evil for that.

Read the quote in context here.

I hereby nominate Bram Stoker’s original Dracula as the official novel of the “no-sex” class paradigm. I mean, think about it! A charming, inexplicable, and wealthy… but also relentless, carnivorous, and overwhelmed by animal compulsion man sets his sights on an innocent and (by definition in this case) disinclined flower of a girl, mesmerizes her so that she has no idea what her role is, warps and corrupts other men and women in his pursuit of her, and is finally defeated when he’s penetrated by the custodial men of his would-be paramour. Extra bonus features? The female vampires of Dracula’s castle initially want to seduce/consume Jonathan Harker but are frustrated by the male vampire who makes them settle for the blood of an infant or small child he brings them! (Note also that the vampire Lucy, a proper Victorian, intuitively preys only on children.) Oh yeah, and what awaits Mina and befalls Lucy for succumbing is, literarily literally, a fate worse than death!

Interestingly, at the end of the novel when his soul is “released” even the vampire’s expression carries gratitude and relief… before it crumbles to dust. That’s all that foreshadows the vampire’s later incarnations as conflicted seducers — beginning I’m pretty sure, with the soulful Barnabas Collins in the Gothic 60s soap opera Dark Shadows and extending through Anne Rice’s novels, Sting’s Burbon Street, and more recently Buffy, True Blood, and, evidently, now Twilight.

But anyway I’m with Olvlzl — the very different attitudes and fantasies about male vs. female vampires come from the same place.

Why Reality Trumps Fantasy

Sun, 2008-02-10 09:28


Photo by Flickr user JND90745. Used under a Creative Commons license.

Monique of the 99% non-sex blog bounceswoosh.org has a thoughtful post linking back to one of my old posts about sexual double standards very inappropriately imposed on children.

“>http://www.realadultsex.com/archives/2006/03/boys_should_get_to_be_boys.html

It’s about how when a man has sex with a girl, it’s perceived as damaging to the girl, but when a woman has sex with a boy, it’s something the boy should feel, to borrow what I believe is a British term, chuffed about. Hey, man, high five!

And so it occurs to me that the problem here is related to the problem that people encounter in trying to decide if they should share their sexual fantasies or not. (The specific situation I’m thinking about is a boy who is old enough to have coherent sexual urges but not really old enough to make big decisions for himself.) Yes, there’s a lot of literature, tv, etc about how great it is for an adolescent boy when an experienced woman introduces him to the wide world of sex. But that’s fantasy. Just because a boy might have talked about how awesome it would be to “do” his teacher, doesn’t mean he’s actually ready for it…

So going broader, as a society we have confused the fantasy (I’m sure a lot of teens and pre-teens have had sexual crushes on their teachers or some other adult in their vicinity) with a reality that is damaging and awful.

Read the quote in context here.

I think that when trying to parse this stuff out it’s helpful to build up a little table or checklist with a column for boys and one for girls and then just go down it. (Metaphorically if not literally that is.) So, for instance, there’s no doubt at all that boys often get the hots for teachers — I remember all the boys in my elementary school talking about passionately hoping they’d get Miss [So-and-so] when we got to 5th Grade. But here’s the thing, I also know girls harbor equally vague but attracted thoughts for their teachers. And so on down the list.

But (assuming they’ll grow up to be autonomous, equal adults) it’s also equally important that as they approach their own adulthoods that both boys and girls transfer their idealized feelings for adults into real, initially tentative and then gradually more competent feelings for each other.

With the problem being that when adults step into the mix they effectively short-circuit developmental negotiate-with-your-peers experiences. Which would be fine in one of those societies where, say, years after their fathers arrange for their sons to have sex they finally earn enough money to buy child brides. In circumstances like that, peer development is no more relevant than central heat or a common currency. (And lest you think I’m making imperialist generalizations see Spencer, Diana: married age 20, and Charles, Prince: married age 32.)

Elsewhere, however, it’s pretty darn important not just for girls to develop naturally with their peers but for boys to as well.

Doesn’t mean they fantasize harmlessly (after all some people’s fantasies involve Donald Trump and event though they have to know that reality wouldn’t work out so hot either) but it does mean it’s not worth it to the child’s long-term social and sexual well-being to act on it.

TMI Tuesday... or whatever

Wed, 2007-10-24 18:41

So while I’m waiting to post this week’s Half-nekkid Thursday entry a little early, I thought I’d complete this week’s TMI-Tuesday questions a little late.

1. What are your 7 favorite tactile things that turn you on? Sex (like oral, or penetrative) cannot be an answer. (Examples: silk, light tickling, etc).

  • Um kissing? Oh yeah.
  • Curling up like spoons with a partner and she wriggles back against me
  • Soft breasts pressing lightly into my back
  • The impossibly soft feel of a partner’s bare leg against my hand, just millimeters away from the leg band of her undies
  • The heat radiating against the back of my hand at that moment
  • The I-can’t-describe-it “zingy” feel… sort of a pulse maybe?... of nipples in the center of the palms of my hands.
  • A hand behind me on shoulder, neck, back, ass, or thigh, pulling me closer
  • I know this is #8 but I gotta get to it: the total familiar/exotic feel of someone’s waist against my arm when I hug them low and pull them close to me. Can’t explain, maybe, but my whole nervous system says “this is right“ every time it happens.

2. What are your non-genital erogenous zones and what do you like done to them?

  • Nipples. They’re non-genital in any event. Mine are sort of hit and miss. Sometimes they’re just more skin on my chest and nothing you can do will light them up. Other times anything from the lightest touch to a pretty intense bite goes straight to my cock.
  • Balls. Technically I guess they’re genital but they’re so often neglected I’m putting them in. I’m not at all sure I’d ever want someone to “teabag” me or otherwise take one or both testicles in their mouth. I’ve had two vasectomies and a reversal and there are some vessels in there that are just too… I dunno… short for that. But mmm, if you “spider” them with your fingernails, especially at critical, um, moments? Kazowie that feels nice!
  • Mouth. Not just when you kiss me but when I kiss you or you present your favorite parts to them for me to kiss.
  • Fingers. Does anyone not like getting their fingers slurped into their partner’s mouth? (For that matter does anyone not love doing that to their partner? I love it — love the kind of creamy look people’s eyes get when I do.)

3. What sounds get you sexually charged?

  • Zippers. Oh yeah!
  • That little sort of not-exactly-nervous swallow a lot of people, including me, make when they realize things are moving from “I wonder if something sexual is about to happen” to “I wonder what sexually is going to happen.”
  • Hearing someone in the distance clearly having sex… and then hearing your partner or companion make that not-exactly-nervous swallow!
  • Your partner no longer able to clearly say “more” through lust-thickened breathing
  • The moment… instant… of dead silence between short fast panting and long, hard, shuddering sighs.

4. After losing your virginity, what is the longest you¿ve gone without penetrative sex?

Penetrative sex? I think this must be a tough one for some gay women. For me though I think it might have been nearly two years. During my 20s there were definitely a couple of year-long gaps. I think the longest was two.

5. What is your least favorite sexual position?

“Cowgirl.” My cock bends upwards with the best of them but downwards not at all. Bouncing is fine. Hip rolling? Great. Forward and back — which seems to feel best for an awful lot of partners? Oww!

I have mixed feelings about most women-on-top positions for, I think, the same reason a lot of women have mixed feelings about man on top. The angles of penetration often aren’t quite right, usually putting the most pressure where I have the least nerve endings. That’s great, of course, when a partner wants or needs lots of time. Not so hot if, like quite a few partners, they a) get off like a rocket and then b) are done for the evening because they’re counter-stereotypical “one shot wonders” and too sensitive, sleepy, or gosh-look-at-the-time to let me have my turn.

Bonus (as in optional):If you could sexually dominate or submit to 5 people – any 5, currently living or deceased – which 5 would it be?

  • A gentleman never tells.
  • Although a gentleman might also have… close to five good ideas.
  • I think technically I’d rather not be dominated sexually at all. But then I now know a fair number of people who know exactly what they’re doing. Maybe I just haven’t known what I was missing.
  • As for being dominant? There are so many ways to be dominant, from just leading at ballroom dancing to turning a partner over one’s knee to… well, let’s just say there are a lot of options. It would depend entirely on one’s partner though since everybody has different likes, dislikes, and, um, needs.

Criminal Rape, consensual rape fantasies, and responsibilities

Mon, 2005-12-05 17:39

A week or two ago a bunch of sex bloggers, including me, brought mentioned the r-word fantasy: consensual rape.

It’s a properly taboo fantasy because so fucking much is at stake in the real world.

The story swirling around the non-sex blogosphere is about a young woman who may go to jail soon for accusing her boyfriend and three other men of gang-raping her. Here’s the version as reported in the Portland Oregonian, via Kevin Drum of The Washington Monthly where I first encountered the story.

The accuser’s accusation is evidently cloudy enough that even her lawyer said he understands why prosecutors declined to charge the men. However the prosecutors turned around, charged the woman for making false statements, and now she faces up to 30 days in jail and a $1,250 fine.

Sigmund Freud (who I perhaps over reference) made a point that crimes that are the most taboo (and thus most harshly punished) are often the crimes the majority themselves feel the greatest urges to commit. I happen to think the differences are clear between the consensual “frankly my dear I don’t give a damn” ravishment of fantasy and the felonious sexual assaults of reality, but an awful lot of other people seem to find the two easily confused. Which, now that I think of it, was probably what Freud had in mind. (Obligatory caveat: While I agree with a number of Freud’s observations I’m not a Freudian in the sense that I accept his grand theories of everything — the more I read about him and, especially his direct descendents, the loopier his grand theories seem. But I’m digressing.)

I also happen to believe that rapists — real perpetrators of criminal sexual assault — get a fuck of a lot of mileage out of people’s confusion, their unspoken assumptions, their underlying frustrations, their selective memories, and their squeamish unwillingness to speak directly about sex.

—-

I’m not going to express my (very real) outrage about the adult “boys” (the prosecutor’s term) who had sex with this underage woman. I’m not going to express dismay about the way single cases such as this poison the well for multitudes of clear-cut victims (although as a long-ago crisis counselor I know too well how much harder it makes it for victims to come forward and for prosecutors to obtain convictions.) Others in the blogosphere are doing this exceptionally well. I agree with them with all my heart.

I’m not even going to suggest that people who enjoy consensual rape fantasies or other D/s relationships keep their fantasies to themselves for fear of further muddying the water for real victims. Instead I’m going once again going to quote from Steff’s remarkable post about sex and communications

I think the biggest thing wrong in North American relationships today is our almost Puritanical approach to talking about anything sexual. We have so many hang-ups and inhibitions when it comes to sex. We got to get past this, people.

We refuse to talk about it. Or most people do, that is. It’s shunned. We talk about things surrounding sex — the flirtation, the outfits, the seduction, the wining ‘n’ dining, the commitment, the logistics — but never the nitty gritty, the real stuff that affects us on an individual level.

The issue isn’t that some people (lots? few? it doesn’t matter but I suspect lots) have rape fantasies. The issue isn’t even that they do or don’t feel properly guilty about it. The problem is that since those fantasies are double taboo — taboo romantic fantasies about a taboo violent crime — no one is willing to talk about them in any but the most romantic, “just this once,” stylized/pornified fashion. Since people don’t discuss the excitement and/or enjoyment they get from fantasizing or role-playing rape in stand-up, pants-on settings everyone else makes assumptions like “she really wanted it” and “these boys were only having fun.”

The BDSM community does a wonderful, sometimes even over the top job of explaining themselves and educating people about what they do, how to enjoy it most, and how to reduce the risks. The formerly peripheral gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transsexual community did an outstanding job clarifying and demystifying themselves (despite pockets of surprisingly deep but fading in relevancy pockets of resistance.) Sex toy aficionados have succeeded so well that (outside of a few deep red localities) toys are sold Tupperware-style in suburban homes. Lately polyamorists have been making enough headway that articles on “the new monogamy” now crop up in mainstream publications.

Everyone has benefited from these information campaigns, opponents, potential opponents, potential practitioners, and practitioners alike. But not rape fantasists and role-players. They — you, we, us — are still in the closet about it. You/we/they aren’t getting the word out. I/they/we have been falling down on the job about what does and doesn’t work, how one deals with it… what is and isn’t ok! That’s a shame because unnamed girls in Oregon are suffering as a result. And unnamed “boys” in Oregon and other, even more dangerous perpetrators, are getting away with it.

For once I’m sorry that I haven’t really felt those fantasies for going on three decades now or I’d be kicking this post off with a big fat essay outlining what I know with recommendations for how to proceed. I don’t remember enough, I haven’t experienced enough, to do so. That I once had those fantasies, though, makes it my problem anyway.

It’s a fantasy that, truth be told, I’d just as soon went away. But evidence in porn, blog posts, popular literature, and too many jury pools and judicial chambers suggests it’s not going to. As an excellent senior technical writer used to tell me all too often, “When a confusing term keeps coming back to haunt users, canonize it: define it, explain it clearly, and repeat it so that no one mistakes your meaning.” This fantasy/reality of consensual vs. criminal rape would be a textbook example. Neither the fantasy nor, I’m very sorry to say, the crime are going away. Therefore it would be best to canonize the fantasy to a point that fantasy participants, passers by, and, ideally, prosecutors can tell the difference and act responsibly… and put more of the right people and fewer of the wrong people in jail!

If you’ve put some thought into it, or can point me to people who have, I’d love to hear about it. If you’d like to put your suggestions in comments or email I’d love to hear them. If you’d be willing to talk to each other about it I’d appreciate it.

User login