sexual fantasy

My Answer to the Question at Em & Lo's: "Is the FFM threeway really the holy grail for straight guys?"

Tue, 2010-06-01 15:44

I’m in this week’s Wise Guys feature at Em & Lo says

“Is the FFM threeway really the holy grail for straight guys? If so, why? And if it’s not, why do so many people assume it is?”

Read the gay and straight Wise Guy answers here.

And here’s how I answered:

I think it just ties a lot of stereotypical male fantasies together: voyeurism, variety, the possibly mistaken impression that women just automatically know better how to give each other orgasms (which guys generally really want but aren’t always sure how to give). There are also the fantasies of polygamy, of enabling promiscuity (a girlfriend might not mind you sleeping around if she’s right there with you doing it). And there’s also the not-quite-laughable fantasy that the average man can satisfy two (or more) women, at the same time, all by himself.

In my only real, all-the-way threeway I joined a woman I had a desperate crush on and together we gave her partner an extremely good time. But after that we fulfilled my favorite holy grail: one-on-one sex ’til dawn with an experienced, very enthusiastic partner that I really, really like. Based on that experience, I think threeways are perfectly lovely. But they’re more of an “everyone should visit Paris” sort of milestone than a holy grail. Put it this way: I don’t think as many people lose as much sleep wishing they could have a second threeway as they do wishing they could have their first.

What "Rape Culture" Means, At Least To Me

Tue, 2008-04-15 11:37

Ok. So you know how I knew I’d been part of rape culture?

It wasn’t that almost the first porn I’d been exposed to, and masturbated vigorously to by the way, was the serial-rape Victorian fantasy “A Man With a Maid.” No, that would have been to obvious and besides, that was “just” about “seduction by other means.” (Yeah, right.) Although that’s certainly about as rape-culture as it gets.


Photo by Flickr user Bicycle Bob.
Used under a Creative
Commons license.

And it wasn’t that I liked to play tie-up games with some of my earliest partners… especially since at least one of those partners was seriously into setting up these elaborate, generally bodice-ripper-y roleplaying scenarios. Although that’s certainly about as rape-culture as it gets.

And it wasn’t even that the first time I ever heard the suggestion that someone my age would want sex with someone else my age (4th or 5th grade) when one kid at the next desk over whispered to me “I’d like to rape [so and so.]” Even though, later, when I asked him what the heck that meant anyway, he said, confidently, it meant “make someone fall in love with you.” Although that’s certainly about as rape-culture as it gets.

Because while all that was going on I firmly believed that only the most heinous punishments should be reserved for rapists. Castrations? Sure. Eyes burned out with rusty, salt-encrusted tongs? Why not. Penis nailed to a stump, the stump set on fire, and leaving them with nothing but a hatchet? I didn’t make that one up but I agreed vigorously when it was proposed as “letting them off easy.”

And if I could feel that way about it (all without knowing anyone who had disclosed that she’d been raped) then how could I possibly be part of rape culture?

And then?

And then…

And then in 1981, when I was 26, in a first-year journalism class, I interviewed a campus rape crisis counsellor who brought me up to date (I’d been a peer crisis/sex-ed counsellor ten years earlier but a heck of a lot of thought and action went into issues during that time. And then, partly due to outreach efforts and partly due feminist advocacy for rape prevention policies, women I knew started coming forward with their stories.

And the more I started seeing it as a crime and not sex, and the more I started associating it with real people who’d suffered real violence?

The less I wanted to concoct ever newer, ever more lurid punishments and…

And the more I just wanted it to stop. By any means necessary, sure, but by only those means necessary.

In other words, when rape stopped being a fantasy, ideas about what might constitute deterrent punishment stopped being a fantasy as well.**

Also, when it stopped being a fantasy I started recognizing exactly what kind of crime it is… that it is about power and not about sex. People keep saying “but it is about sex…” but if you’ve spent much time around bullies and their victims (whoo boy!) you begin to notice the seemingly psychic way they’re able to key in to and even thrive on exploiting the worst fears and biggest vulnerabilities. If it’s fat they use that even though they or their friends my be no less fat. Is it “not from around here?” Then it doesn’t matter that other kids are even newer. Unless that’s their vulnerability too they’ll be victimized for something else. The point being that bullying is about power, and the power wielded is about what you fear and what you value or, to be more precise, what your assailant believes is what you fear or value. And if this isn’t too controverted by more recent clinical research, I’m pretty sure that if sexual transgression wasn’t the worst thing society, and individuals in it, could imagine then I’m also pretty sure there’d be a lot less of it and a lot more of… whatever personal transgression we instead most feared and hated.

So that’s what I hear when someone says “it’s a crime of power, not sex.” And it’s how I answer when someone, inevitably says “but it is about sex.” Yes, it’s about the power of sex as leverage, about sex as “the worst thing.” Just as, incidentally, and perhaps tellingly, talk of castration with rusty razors or execution by drawing and quartering and burnt entrails and all that after-the-fact-ery is also about the power of “the worst.”

Anyway, I’m not saying I’m not still part of rape culture because can one ever really escape one’s culture? Completely? I dunno. I do know, though, that bleating little “not me” mea culpas aren’t much help. Instead to the extent it’s possible I can still work the numbers, spread the word, check in with partners to make sure we’re both role-playing, ask strangers first “do you want help,” and otherwise whether or not one ever makes it through to never stop moving towards the exits till you’re through.

And seriously, it does have to stop or be stopped. By the most effective means. Stopping it doesn’t have to be dramatic, as long as it stops. And stopping it doesn’t have to be violent, as long as it stops. An stopping it doesn’t even have to be emotionally satisfying, as long as it stops. It’s just time. People keep getting hurt.

[** Speaking of lurid fantasies, how ‘bout that “let’s send ‘em to prison and let ‘em find out how they like gettin’ raped” fantasy that perpetually spills from the mouths of lightweight comedians and shock jocks? Hmm. How about “that only punishes the first rapist and rewards all the rest?” And how about “that only ratifies rape as a punishment and makes all other discussion just haggling about who ‘deserves it’ or not?” —-fl]

[Oh yeah, and just to be clear? It’s ok to still have fantasies as long as one’s fantasies are distinguished from reality. Playing pirates, or even “jack-booted thugs,” or adult diaper play... or even disproportionate-punishment play is almost always more enjoyable when there’s no plausible threat of the real thing happening to anyone around you. —fl]

What do you say to a naked lady? Uncle vs. uncle

Tue, 2005-09-06 16:00

About 25 years ago now I used to ride a bus to school. You know how there always seems to be one person on every bus who knows all and tells much to everyone in general? On my ride home there was always this woman who editorialized about her high morality and the degeneracy of pretty much everyone else. I tuned her out most of the time but she said one thing that’s reverberated since: she was so glad laws are so strict because otherwise she’d shoplift, steal, and assault people all the time.

I’m an optimistic man but not an entirely naive one. I think she was mistaken. I thing that, under normal circumstances, most people don’t need laws to do the right thing.

I’ve seen several posts over the last year that have reminded me of that.

First, there’s this one from the extremely creative Phillip at hotaction.ca

I’ll get back to writing in a few days. I kidnapped a beautiful heiress and I’ve been holding her for ransom. Here are a few photos I took today, deep in my forest hideout.

[He includes six photos of a partner handcuffed in the woods including

this one. —fl]

Then there’s a photo ThatGirl of [the now-dark] thatgirl’s life took around the time of her own trip into the woods.

[now-unavailable image of erstwhile blogger ThatGirl bound to a tree by the chain connecting her nipple clamps]

And, on a similar theme this afternoon, Ruby Princess of [also now-dark] Paths, plights, and perils posted the following

you get to catch a glimpse of my evening bound to the bedpost. do tell me, what you think of my predicament? you wouldn’t take advantage now, would you?

[now-unavailable image of now-dark blogger Ruby Princess partially dressed and chained to a bedpost]

The funny thing (not really even that funny) is that like most people if I found a naked woman tied to a tree in the woods or chained to a bed I’d go all boy-scout, unbind her, wrap her in a blanket, call 911, try to secure the area as best I could, the whole straight-arrow, true-blue, what-can-I-do-to-help routine. Unless she said “thanks, I appreciate your offer to help but I’m in the middle of playing a scene with Phillip,” and even then I’d almost certainly apologize and withdraw rather than take advantage of her situation.

On the other hand it would excite me terribly to play a scene like that with someone who’d bound herself voluntarily. (Allowing me to surpress my involuntary boy-scout reflex — but with the emphasis on “allow to supress”.) Under those circumstances I’d walk up behind her, whisper in her ear “Don’t say ‘uncle’ unless you want me to stop…” and after a decent pause to let her back out, I’d absolutely take advantage of her generous offer.

Questions, assuming you’d put yourself in this position voluntarily: If you were blindfolded would you want to remain blindfolded or would you rather be able to watch my hands reach around you, touch your collarbones and then move purposfully downward? Would it make a difference if you knew how much it would turn me on to make you watch? Remembering you could always say “uncle” would you prefer to be treated gently or roughly? Would you prefer that I treated you as if I was your captor, with the full dominant/submissive subspace experience, or would it be even more intense if I was a rescuer who, despite his best intentions, succumbed to temptation — maybe accidentally touching your breasts as he reached up to untie you or maybe noticing how aroused you were as he bent to unchain your legs? (Mmm, the more I think about it the more I like that reluctant-ravisher/irresistable-ravishee bottomed from the top scenario.)

User login