Kate Sheppard of TAPPED reposts some interesting information that goes against any number of classic social-conservative assumptions about race, class, income, and promiscuity.
Foreign Policy has an infographic in this month’s issue about sex, and safe sex, around the world. Seems the number of sexual partners grows with income; people in low-income countries average 6.3 partners, while high-income countries average 9.7. People in high-income nations also have sex earlier, and are more likely to have unprotected sex – with nations like Norway, Denmark, Sweden, Australia and New Zealand at the head of the pack. Also, Icelanders and Germans lose their virginity earliest, and your sexual preference isn’t a very likely determinant of whether or not you use protection. The info comes from the world’s largest survey of sexual behavior, conducted by Durex (the condom purveyor). Fascinating.
Dana Goldstein, also of TAPPED, adds a brilliant point
What strikes me about the sex statistics you cite, Kate, is that they really upturn the stereotype that promiscuity is primarily responsible for the spread of HIV/AIDS in the developing world. Indeed, in Zimbabwe, for example, women’s access to prenatal care is a stronger determinant of a population group’s HIV infection rate than the prevalence of prostitution. Educating women and giving them comprehensive reproductive health care is one of the very best ways to fight AIDS.
Nuts and bolts of reproductive education and heathcare basics aren’t as, um, sexy as fulminating about, say, abstience, but it’s a better use of aid dollars. (And really, if someone wants to go squandering money on abstinence education it looks like Sweden, Iceland, and Germany have the biggest “crisis” in non-abstienence. And look how their societies are just falling apart! Oh yeah, and if you look at that Foreign Policy infographic, what’s up with Turkey?)




Submitted by 1636 (not verified) on Sun, 2007-09-30 00:21.
I checked, it's their online survey from 2005, so the data is bound to be incomplete from countries where many people don't have electricity, never mind internet access.
[Excellent. Odd that Foreign Affairs would have run with it but... Hey, have I ever mentioned that it's really great to know someone who's a) got a handle on statistical research, b) has lived in sub-Saharan Africa, and c) isn't overly influenced by the American cultural echo chamber? Thanks, A! --fl]
Submitted by 1636 (not verified) on Fri, 2007-09-28 00:25.
But they've missed out all of Africa apart from South Africa. Which I could live with if their first sentence hadn't been "Where is sex safer: sub-Saharan Africa or Scandinavia". I'm not certain where they got their figures from, but I do wonder if it was that online survey - a self-selected group if ever there was one.
[Good eye, A. I wonder if it's the chart or the actual data that's incomplete. Thanks! --fl]