Holly of The Pervocracy is on a bit of a tear, brilliant-insight post-wise this weekend.
Home Depot rope. Jon and I use Home Depot rope. Isn’t that horrible? It’s absolutely true that Twisted Monk rope is better; from what I hear it’s woven from the treasure trails of the gods themselves. But what bothers me is the idea that Monk rope is right and Home Depot is wrong. Not lower quality, not more limited in uses, not requiring more caution, but… incorrect.
Bullshit. I’m not going to write a whole paragraph elaborating on this because my opinion fits in five words: Nothing that works is wrong. You can put Heinz on filet mignon if that’s what tastes best to you.
...
By the way, one of the worst manifestations of the “gotta do it right!” attitude I’m thinking about here is the idea that what Jon and I do isn’t even BDSM. Because, honestly? It’s mostly just spanking, rough sex, and overhand knots. There’s no medical-grade electrical boxes or 10-gauge needles or ultra-realistic walrus dildos. And I always feel oddly inferior, almost like a poser, for calling something BDSM that doesn’t even draw blood half the time.
Actually the question of “right” and “wrong” in hobbies with established traditions is kind of interesting. On the one hand it’s absolutely true that “inside the tradition of high French cuisine ketchup on fillet mignon is wrong.” On the other hand it tastes pretty good.
When I was a young, recent refugee from Southern Appalachia, having been raised on live-on-radio-and-tv performances by Flatt & Scruggs, Porter Wagoner, Bill Monroe and the Blue Grass Boys, Tennessee Earnie Ford, and too many other (unavoidable and, post Beatles, unavoidably boring) country/western, folk, and bluegrass musicians, I was always startled to meet young gentlemen from places like Long Island and Cambridge, MA who tartly informed me, when I played bluegrass on street corners and coffee houses that “Bill Monroe didn’t play it that way.” This was all true, of course, but then neither did I chew “Bull O’ The Woods” plug tobacco, Brylcream hair tonic, Foremost buttermilk, Bunny bread, nor any of the other products that sponsored those musicians. Nor did I wear my grandpa’s sock garters which, truth be told, would have been about as likely as me playing anything exactly the way Bill Monroe (my grandfather’s age) would have.
But then who would know the “right” way to play bluegrass, someone raised listening to KNOX and the Cas Walker Show or some musicologist from Brookline? To be honest the jury may still be out since I wasn’t a terribly accomplished musician, but I’ll be danged if I wasn’t authentic as Hell!
So nowadays whenever someone comes along and says something like “you’re doing bluegrass wrong,” or quilting, or, especially these days BDSM wrong I think about the most important movie ever made about technical hobbies — not quite a documentary but nevertheless surprisingly lifelike: Baz Luhrmann’s Strictly Ballroom. It says everything you need to know.
This is in no way intended as a knock against the “bluegrass police” in their too-often green satin zip-up jackets, or the used-car-dealer or insurance-industry-actuaries without whom there really might be no traditions at all. Same with those who uphold the “faith” in BDSM circles. But! Neither should one approach those who would hold the reins of this tradition or that as ultimate authorities. Nor should one forget (as Mancur Olsen discusses in his academic work The Logic of Collective Action: Public Goods and the Theory of Groups, Second printing with new preface and appendix (Harvard Economic Studies)) that those who are most interested in maintaining traditions often have an awful lot to gain.
Anyway, I happen to agree with Holly and plenty of others that if you really want to restrain someone head-to-foot with both safety and style then yeah, Monk’s beautiful hemp rope is the bee’s knees. If you just want to bind your partner’s hands to the headboard so they can’t stop you from throwing you down and ravishing you till you’re good and ready then yeah, anything at hand will work just great. There is no “right” way to play Fox on the Run (trust me), there’s no “right” way to ballroom dance, there’s no “right” condiment for fillet mignon, and there’s certainly no way to make your partner moan or roar with delight. (Even though there are some very good teachers for all of those things.)




Submitted by 1588 (not verified) on Sun, 2007-09-02 21:40.
with the fillet mignon it's a bit different. after all, the people that really know how to cook them (and invent other meal combinations) go through a lot of years of schooling and training to hone their skills and tastes.
it's one thing to put ketchup on your fillet mignon at home and eat it, if that's the way you like it. it's quite another if you have your own restaurant and call it the same thing when you're serving it to the public, who may be expecting something different personally speaking, i don't have anything against you serving it, just against you calling it the same thing. (just as i object to velveeta and other orange-colored products being called "cheese" or "cheese products" when they're not or mexican food being called mexican food when you know damn well if you go to mexico they clearly don't prepare stuff like that there)
with bdsm it's different though and not really comparable. bdsm is not a product or a brand name commodity. it's a word that's meant to describe a collection of actions that turns some people on. therefore for anyone to call anyone unfaithful to what what bdsm stands for because they like to use a different kind of rope of all things is ridiculous and stupid. i would understand if one of these loyalists was being forced to change, but so long as the act is kept between the people involved, i don't see whose business it is to object to any of it. it's as ridiculous as trying to regulate what kind of sex people are allowed to have. besides, anyone worth listening to knows that the only things that ought to be regulated are actions that have (negative) externalities. choice of rope or choice of what kind of sex to have isn't one of them, for the love of sanity.
[First of all thanks, kermit. Your points are excellent. If I can I'd like to add a couple of caveats to my post. First, that some rules in BDSM are there *for a reason!* And the closer you get to the edge the better an idea they are. (By analogy technical rock climbers rarely chaff at rules for tying knots.) And secondly I ought to mention that BDSM is really an condensed acronym for quite a few practices including B&D, D/s, and S&M, some of which have quite a few more conventions (and concerns) than others. *BUT!* That said, Holly's point that something in this book or that (red/yellow/green safewords, for instance) are less immutable laws than opportunities for communication and interpretation. Thanks again. --fl]
Submitted by 1588 (not verified) on Mon, 2007-09-03 07:20.
I admire your patience with purists. I tend to agree with < a href = "http://itre.cis.upenn.edu/~myl/languagelog/">Language Log--a lot of prescriptivists don't even understand what the traditions are. (They blog about grammar and not about sex, but the basic idea is similar. And they're quite funny and worth reading.)
Isn't one legitimate BDSM tradition making your own sex toys, or turning things into sex toys? Some of the stuff sold at fetish stores (crops, floggers, outfits) is more expensive than comparable stuff you can get elsewhere or make yourself. Monk's rope is probably nicer than Home Depot rope, but a lot of homemade or converted stuff is at least as high-quality as the stuff fetish shops sell.
You say BDSM is not a brand name, and I think that's right, but just like fancy cuisine, it's influenced by people with money to make.
["...a lot of prescriptivists don't even understand what the traditions are" And that was the point I and, I think, Holly was trying to make. It's not that there's no place for rules, it's that rules are often most strenuously enforced by those who are poorly informed. Oh, and by the way, for really technical rope bondage Monk's rope *really is* nicer, and for some sets considerably safer. For simple bedsteading, though, it's just one of many nice options. Thanks, P. --fl]
Submitted by 1588 (not verified) on Mon, 2007-09-03 16:44.
Ack! kermit says BDSM is not a brand name. Sorry, kermit!
Submitted by 1588 (not verified) on Tue, 2007-09-04 07:41.
lower case k, P. Burke, lower case k. just as lower case everything else up there
[I'll keep that in mind, kermit. Since "figleaf" is a, well, *figleaf* and not a name I'm a lower-case "f" :-) Thanks. --fl]