For some reason I woke up this morning thinking about the final sentence in the standard English-language wedding ceremony
“...you may now kiss the bride”
It’s is probably the shortest, purest distillation of the two rules of the No-Sex Class paradigm.
—-
The two rules, you may recall, are
#1: It is simultaneously inconceivable and intolerable for a woman to have sexual desire. #2: It is simultaneously inconceivable and intolerable for a man to be sexually desired.
Saying it any other way than “You may now kiss the bride” would violate the rules #1 and #2 in a number of obvious ways. It also commits the double slight of a) sexualizing the woman (who only gets to be kissable) and b) objectifying her (whatever her name is she’s always reduced to “the bride.”)
But actually what popped awake this morning wasn’t the “...kiss the bride” part, it was “you may now…” part because it speaks to the question (asked in comments by RemittanceGirl, here) of who benefits from the rules… who benefits from the paradigm… who, really, benefits from patriarchy.
The pat answer is usually “men.”
The more traditional answer though, and I think more accurate, is “their families.” Because for all the power we ascribe to men, the message we’re given is that (as our English teachers might put it) whatever they can do before marriage they may not.
—-
I write a lot about feminism aware of the ambiguities of doing so as a man. And I reconcile the ambiguity by trying to understand the impact anti-feminism a.k.a. the patriarchy a.k.a. the dominant paradigm has on men. And I feel it’s more accurate to say I’m thinking from a feminist perspective rather than one of the more traditional avenues of men’s studies or men’s rights because… well, it’s not just about helplessly flapping about how “patriarchy hurts men too so that’s why women don’t deserve this or that sovereignty.” Instead I’m trying to understand not that men are hurt too but how we’re hurt, and to explore how our perception of that hurt either adds to or distracts us from how to get it to stop hurting anybody.
It just seems like identifying how men are hurt, and trying to find the exits in a way that doesn’t involve stepping over anybody else to get there, is or ought to be a pretty crucial.
One of the more enduring problems is that it’s pretty clear that compared to women society privileges men way more than women… and yet when you talk to us it’s pretty clear that for all our very real privilege we don’t perceive it ourselves!
Since there’s probably nothing more dangerous than a powerful human being who thinks he or she is powerless that’s not good. At all.
Quick question: Given the weight of the institutions telling the groom “you may now kiss the bride,” who do you think it makes the most sense for men to fulminate about: women (either individually or collectively) or patriarchy?




Submitted by 2690 (not verified) on Tue, 2009-02-03 13:25.
When you first started on this concept of the "no-sex class" it seemed like a quaint but useful diversion. But it seems to have taken over your blog to the point that I don't think I can read it anymore. I'm sure you realize that it is an extreme hyperbole of the way the world actually functions. I think to some extent that's the point. But I think beating on it over and over may do the opposite - it reenforces the legitimacy of the concept by talking about it. I don't live in this extreme world. I'm happier concentrating on my happy non-extreme world and trying to talk about expanding that works, rather than dwelling on the extreme world I've escaped from. In my happy non-extreme world I've gone to a LOT more weddings where the vows end with "You may now kiss", though I've seen a few of the "you may kiss the bride" version.
[Funny you should mention that, Plymouth. I have been obsessing about it now for, what, a year and a half? Ironically those last two posts about it, the one with the two rules and this one about "you may now kiss the bride" (which, sorry, is still used in less-cool weddings) kind of got me to where I wanted to be: two or three concise lines that explain what bugs me about social (as opposed to interpersonal) sexual dysfunction. So while I'll probably still be pretty boring I feel like there's a big weight off my chest and I can lighten up a little. Ironically this may be bad timing if you're taking off, but... it's a good example of great minds thinking alike. :-) --fl]
I'm not sure I'm explaining this well. I just know that the more times I see it the more I twitch inside. It makes reading your blog an unpleasant experience. I don't expect you to stop on my account - I'm just one reader among many and if other people find it useful maybe I should just happily go my way and leave it to other people. But I've enjoyed enough of your other writings to not want to disappear without saying something.