Via Research Blogging, psychology blogger Dr. Deb says
Uh oh.ÂÂ
This is sure to spark some debate.
The sexual behavior of teenagers who pledge abstinence does not differ from that of closely matched non-pledgers. Moreover, pledgers are less likely to protect themselves from pregnancy and disease.ÂÂ
Rosenbaum, J. (2009). Patient Teenagers? A Comparison of the Sexual Behavior of Virginity Pledgers and Matched Nonpledgers PEDIATRICS, 123 (1) DOI: 10.1542/peds.2008-0407
And while we’re at it, from the abstract of the actual paper by Rosenbaum. (Emphasis mine.)
OBJECTIVE. The US government spends more than $200 million annually on abstinence-promotion programs, including virginity pledges. This study compares the sexual activity of adolescent virginity pledgers with matched nonpledgers by using more robust methods than past research.
SUBJECTS AND METHODS. The subjects for this study were National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health respondents, a nationally representative sample of middle and high school students who, when surveyed in 1995, had never had sex or taken a virginity pledge and who were >15 years of age (n = 3440). Adolescents who reported taking a virginity pledge on the 1996 survey (n = 289) were matched with nonpledgers (n = 645) by using exact and nearest-neighbor matching within propensity score calipers on factors including prepledge religiosity and attitudes toward sex and birth control. Pledgers and matched nonpledgers were compared 5 years after the pledge on self-reported sexual behaviors and positive test results for Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis, and safe sex outside of marriage by use of birth control and condoms in the past year and at last sex.
RESULTS. Five years after the pledge, 82% of pledgers denied having ever pledged. Pledgers and matched nonpledgers did not differ in premarital sex, sexually transmitted diseases, and anal and oral sex variables. Pledgers had 0.1 fewer past-year partners but did not differ in lifetime sexual partners and age of first sex. Fewer pledgers than matched nonpledgers used birth control and condoms in the past year and birth control at last sex.
CONCLUSIONS. The sexual behavior of virginity pledgers does not differ from that of closely matched nonpledgers, and pledgers are less likely to protect themselves from pregnancy and disease before marriage. Virginity pledges may not affect sexual behavior but may decrease the likelihood of taking precautions during sex. Clinicians should provide birth control information to all adolescents, especially virginity pledgers.
In particular the bit about 82% denying having ever pledged five years later is kind of… interesting. Wonder what the difference is between those who admit and those who deny pledging? So do I! But I’m not going to cough up the extortionate subscription price to look behind the federally-funded-but-somehow-still-for-profit firewall the publishers erect only because for some reason it’s legal.





Submitted by 2891 (not verified) on Wed, 2009-04-29 02:08.
Not at all surprising. My parents would have been all over that pledge rubbish, had it been in vogue in Australia in the 80's.
I would have gone along with it too - I was "saving myself" for marriage after all, which is just about the same thing - not because I in any way intended to keep any such plegde, or save myself, or whatever else, but just to shut my parents up.
I also had sex before any of my friends did (though not much before) and never carried condoms or was on any HBC (until I moved out of home).
We actually had very good sex education at school (catholic college, incidentally, a nun showed us how to use condoms and was very firm about their importance in relation to STI's and unplanned pregnancy) ... so it wasn't a lack of knowlege on my part. What it was was a deep fear of being caught with such things, labled a slut and excluded from the family.
I actually told my mother, recently, that had I got pregnant as a teen I would have had a secret abortion. She was absolutely horrified at the idea, and more than a little hurt - saying that she would have been supportive and looked after the child etc etc - and wondering how it was that I could think her such an orge. As I told her, how the hell was I supposed to know that? Given the attitude to sex in general and unmarried sex in particular.
Her answer was "I didn't want you thinking that I was condoning it! Then you'd think you had a free pass to do whatever you wanted."
Well, ends up I did whatever I wanted anyway and its just sheer luck that I didn't end up "in trouble".
I can't help wondering how many of the current tribe of parents think the way she did. Surely a bit of open communication is a far better way to go.
Submitted by 2891 (not verified) on Wed, 2009-04-29 06:42.
Yes, these findings should come as no surprise to people who live in a real world and have some common sense when it comes to human behavior. Maybe now that we have a president with common sense who tends to believe peer-reviewed research findings over religious just-so stories, we'll get the funding yanked from AOSE to comprehensive sex education. Oh, and it'd be nice if as a culture we'd get over our stupidity about sex and the double-standard, but I live in hope... :)