One Amazon.com link I will post, however, is this post from Heather Corinna on her Amazon book page for S.E.X.: The All-You-Need-To-Know Progressive Sexuality Guide to Get You Through High School and College.
Is this book (or its author) too gay for an Amazon?
3:01 PM PDT, April 12, 2009, updated at 4:41 PM PDT, April 12, 2009
My book, like many, many others, has recently been deranked by Amazon.In other words, it is no longer listed in the sales ranks with other books of its subject or genre, no matter how good my sales are, or if my sales are above others who are currently listed. As well, my book, as is the case with many others, is not currently listed anymore in the subject heading appropriate to it. That deranking can massively impact us as authors, and also can impact consumers, particularly those who are trying to seek out material on a subject broadly without knowing what books are available by title or author. And with books that serve any sort of marginalized population or subject matter, finding them offline is often tough. Deranking books like mine further marginalizes the already marginalized.
The books this primarily appears to have impacted are those by gay, lesbian, bisexual or transgender authors, young adult or children’s books addressing sexuality, some sexuality books in general (including reference books), as well as some feminist titles. Some of the titles recently deranked besides mine include: James Baldwin’s, Giovanni’s Room, Annie Proulx’s Brokeback Mountain, Jeanette Winterson’s Oranges Are Not The Only Fruit, E. M. Forster’s Maurice, Various, I Do: an anthology in support of marriage equality, Alex Sanchez’s Rainbow Road, The Advocate College Guide for LGBT Students, Kate Bornstein’s Hello Cruel World, Milk: A Pictorial History of Harvey Milk, Dan Savage’s The Kid: What Happened After My Boyfriend and I Decided to Go Get Pregnant, The Ultimate Guide to Sex and Disability: For All of Us Who Live with Disabilities, Chronic Pain and Illness, [Jessica Valenti & Jaclyn Friedman’s] Yes Means Yes: Visions of Female Sexual Power and A World Without Rape, Ruth Bell’s Changing Bodies, Changing Lives: Expanded Third Edition: A Book for Teens on Sex and Relationships, Jessica Valenti’s Full Frontal Feminism: A Young Woman’s Guide to Why Feminism Matters, Toni Weschler’s Cycle Savvy: The Smart Teen’s Guide to the Mysteries of Her Body, Ellen DeGeneres: A Biography and many, many more.
At this time, there is no clear statement from Amazon as to what, exactly, is going on. However, one author, writing in, received the following reply:
In consideration of our entire customer base, we exclude “adult” material from appearing in some searches and best seller lists. Since these lists are generated using sales ranks, adult materials must also be excluded from that feature.
Hence, if you have further questions, kindly write back to us.
Best regards,
Ashlyn D
Member Services
Amazon.com AdvantageThe trouble with that reply is that there is PLENTY of very explicilty “adult” material which has NOT been deranked, and we don’t need to guess much about if it is or isn’t adult when we simply look at some of the titles: Girls Gone Wild: Girls on Girls, Surrender the Booty 3: The Search for More Arse, Jenna Jameson: Ultimate Collection, Girls Kissing: Volume One, Ron Jeremy: The Hardest Working Man in Showbiz, Candy Girl: A Year In The Life Of An Unlikely Stripper, Hot Babes...
My book is intended for young adults, and is GLBT-inclusive, and penned by me, a queer author. It is not salacious, it is not pornography: it is a sexuality, sexual health and relationships reference book. Heather Has Two Mommies is a supportive and classic children’s book about gay families. Hello, Cruel World is a suicide prevention book (which just happens to be written by a transgender author). That’s a short list, but the point is, many of the books that have been deranked are not adult books at all, nor adult or salacious material, but what nearly all of them, so far, do seem to be are tagged or labeled in some way as GLBT, or as books addressing sexuality in a non-heteronormative or gendernormative way.
To give you an idea of how this deranking has impacted a given subject you’d search for, take a look at the current list for books on homosexuality.
You’ll perhaps notice a prevailing theme, and see that if I were looking for books on how what is WRONG with homosexuality, I’d find exactly what I needed there. But if I were merely researching to topic as a whole — or, horror of horrors, did not want to read what was wrong with me and why I needed fixing — I’d find a strange lack of well-rounded material on the subject, including some of the most cornerstone books on or about homosexuality. Huh.
This obviously isn’t about adult material. It seems painfully clear what it is likely about, and all we can hope is that a) we’re wrong in seeing what we are, or that this is some kind of glitch Amazon will fix immediately, and/or b) that if we’re not wrong in our perception of this event, Amazon realizes that, even for a private business who has the right to discriminate however they choose, this kind of discrimination is wrong.
To keep up with what’s been going on, you can see the twitter feed #amazonfail here: http://search.twitter.com/search?q=amazonfail
The following open letter is also very informative: http://booksquare.com/open-letter-to-amazon-regard ing-recent-policy-changes/
I put a letter into Amazon early this morning myself, but have yet to get a response.
Why am I blogging this here? In part because I’d hope, as an author Amazon feels comfortable making a profit from, the least I can do is voice my concerns right here, where my book lives at Amazon. But also, because until this is cleared up, and we all have some explanation and the matter is rectified — and I’ll adapt this post if and when it does — I’d prefer consumers bought my book somewhere else, where we’re all as sure as we can be a company isn’t engaging in sexual discrimination.
Again, not ok at all. If they’re serious, and we’ll see how serious they are, then screw them.




Submitted by 2850 (not verified) on Sun, 2009-04-12 20:39.
Amanda Marcotte is linking to a plausible explanation for this. I tend to think she's right - that this is a case of some wingnuts exploiting a vulnerability in Amazon's system.
If not - then they've lost my business too. I hope not, because they're my source for licorice Altoids, which Trader Joe's has stopped carrying. :-)
[The conspiracy theory she links to sounds wholly plausible. Except I've been combing Amazon book pages (control group: Hannah Arendt) and I'm not finding any "flag for inappropriate content" type links on any pages. But on the other hand it *is* plausible in the sense that a) Amazon's actually awfully sanguine about sex and b) it *did* turn up on a double-faith holiday weekend when you could be sure almost everyone who would ordinarily respond technically or policy-wise would be harder to reach. Which is why I said I'd hold off de-linking them till this shakes out. Thanks, Sungold. Hope you don't have to get Altoids from anywhere else. --fl]
Submitted by 2850 (not verified) on Mon, 2009-04-13 10:39.
That particular explanation and source has no credibility when I read around far enough.
Dear Author site has been doing a breakdown of the metadata and that is a bit telling in itself.
[Hi Adela. I agree. Dear Author's explanation (Amazon started thumb-fingeringly filtering based on publisher-provided metadata/keywords) makes a lot more sense. In multiple dimensions. It's something that could happen overnight, it's something that could be completely arbitrarily imposed (duhh... I know, Boo-boo Bear, let's filter out "sex" and "lesbian"), and it's something that would have produced almost capricious results (e.g. vibrators, being legal "novelties," wouldn't have "sex" anywhere in their manufacturer-provided metadata), and it would turn out to have unexpectedly wide-spread results. The arbitrariness of publisher-provided keywords, by the way, gave it perfect conspiracy-theory qualities -- it provoked people to start looking up books matching partial patterns and then trying to guess why this edition but not that would be blocked, and so on. Question is, though, whether Amazon's going to deal or squeal. For what it's worth I like the company a lot, and don't think this was intentional. It just smacks so much of a "we'll fix it in software, no problem" sort of solution that even if upper management had made a request to chill things a bit in the "innocent" search lists they never intended, or forsaw, this coming. Thanks! --fl]
Submitted by 2850 (not verified) on Mon, 2009-04-13 12:32.
If it originated as a new policy response to the "Think of the children!" crowd they would have been better off creating an AmazonKids site instead of filtering the main site.
Submitted by 2850 (not verified) on Mon, 2009-04-13 13:12.
The story has hit the mainstream media in the UK with outrage at the censorship involved. It was on a national news television programme tonight (Monday) and looks like it's in at least one of the daily national newspapers.
Amazon don't seem to understand the power of the internet (ironic, huh?)
Submitted by 2850 (not verified) on Mon, 2009-04-13 16:45.
Ironic, indeed! You'd think by now they'd have a apology up on their front page. Instead they've still got their silly Kindle 2 front and center.
Jessica Valenti heard directly from her editor (who heard directly from a person at Amazon) that Amazon was deliberately messing around with filters. But it's still not at all clear why anti-gay material was unaffected while pro-LGBT material was blacklisted. They should all be be tagged "gay," right? Or why tons of DVDs with actual "adult" tags still have their rankings? I need to finish my $*&@# taxes so I seriously don't have time to play codebreaker on Amazon's logic, but there really seems to be no common denominator except for blacklisting politically progressive stuff.
Submitted by 2850 (not verified) on Mon, 2009-04-13 17:31.
I heard about it only yesterday. The source that I heard it from seems to believe that it's being done by a few staff members with unlimited power and no oversight.
Whatever. I don't see much need to boycott. I rarely buy from Amazon anyway, because I comparison-shop multiple sites and Amazon usually isn't the one with the best value. If I have trouble finding whatever I'm looking for, then I'll just end up buying from someone else, so they may well end up losing all of their sales to me anyway.
Submitted by 2850 (not verified) on Mon, 2009-04-13 21:51.
Side note: I just checked the Japanese Amazon website... while I'm not entirely fluent in the language, it doesn't seem to be having any issues of this sort. Though searching through DVDs for "gei" or "rezubian" seems to result mostly in porn, but it was pretty much like that already. So it's probably just the English site then.
[Yup. It sounds like it was just English keywords so it probably wouldn't affect Japanese-language searches. Thanks for doing the legwork, Nightfall. --fl]