Pearls before swine revisited

Wed, 2007-10-10 10:05

Michelle Cottle of the conservative New Republic, trying perhaps to be funny, ironic, or else maybe careless, points to an impractical product (a very heavy push-up bra “and matching barrette!”) from an underwear company and says…

Here is the gift that taps directly into the lizard brain of pretty much every straight man in America.

She said it here.

(Note also the set of awkward, defensive, offensive, and baffled remarks in the post’s comments section.)

Look. This isn’t even one of those cases where “if it’s not ok to say X (or, in this case, XX) then it’s not ok to say Y (or XY) either.” We call people who go beyond all expectation “heros” because as human beings we almost always rise only to what’s expected of us. Set those expectations low — declare that straight men would love, or that straight women would love to receive, gold-plated, $4,500,000.00 brassier, barbecue tongs, “Manolo Blahniks”, or toilet seat lid — and that’s pretty much all you’re going to get out of them. And if the expectations you set are gender expectations then so much worse.

Yes, Cottle’s remark, whether in jest or not, reinforces a highly sexist stereotype and every instance of that needs to be called out. It doesn’t really matter, though, whether it’s a stereotype against men or women because all such stereotypes reinforce a system of sexism that alienates not just men and women (and men and men, and women and women) from each other but also alienates us from our own sexuality. (I’ll leave for another day the problem of dealing with gender when in the aggregate we can’t even deal with sex.)

Let me reinforce that last point: sexism against either gender strengthens sexism against both. Sexist jokes about men reinforce sexist assumptions about women. Sexist slurs against women bolster sexist attitudes towards men. Unless we really, really enjoy the status quo we need to find some other way to talk about this stuff.

Submitted by 1664 (not verified) on Wed, 2007-10-10 15:46.

There are some things that just appeal to the lizard brain, a creatively designed bra, Manolo's, and the Mercedes SLR McLaren.

One practical design was wide straps, admitting that natural big breast were heavy. That lingerie company put those straps on bras that didn't look like machinery.

[Nice to know they accommodate people that way, Five. Thanks! --fl]

Submitted by 1664 (not verified) on Wed, 2007-10-10 10:46.

I think it's more intended for the "lizard brains" of women. It's a fairly non-exposing ("modest" isn't the word) bra, and the appeal isn't sex but status and beauty. You're supposed to envy the model more than lust for her. The bra looks like it would be more fun to wear than to rip off.

(And even more fun to trade in for a $15 bra and $4,499,985 worth of house and car and tuition and vacations, but never mind that, now I'm sounding like that other kind of woman. And everyone knows that kind probably doesn't even have sex.)

[Other kind of woman? You mean sensible, practical, and intelligent? That does sound like you but I'm not sure "doesn't even have sex" best describes that kind at all. :-) Thanks, Holly. --fl]

User login