
Image, and post inspiration, from Feministing.com.
So… I… I gotta say I always feel a little conflicted when it comes to abstinence-promoting programs like Sherry Cline’s CoolVirginity.com. On the one hand they have perfectly mild advice like
First things first. Best advice is wait to date, 15 and under is just too young. Those years are about discovering who you are as a person first and gaining the maturity to handle the intensity of a relationship.
Which is fine. Really! I happen to agree that, developmentally, it’s best to wait to date, let alone have intercourse. (Just as a virtually all smokers start out as kids who wish they could look more grown up, I think an awful lot of kids rush sex in order to feel grown up. And by rushing or, worse, being rushed, you really do miss out on a lot of cool experiences that really do prepare you not just for handling the intensity of relationships but also handling giving and receiving considerably more enjoyment once you do start having sex.)
So like I say, I don’t really object to the abstract sentiment of promoting abstinence as part of a comprehensive sex education curriculum.
The problem I get into with A-O groups is that they get so focused on virginity as a vehicle for waiting till later that… well…that they come up with absolutely psychotic messages like the image above that, allegedly, is appearing or has appeared on billboards in the Waynesboro, Pennsylvania area.
Because if they’re trying to promote abstinence with that puppy they’re just going about it all the wrong ways!
Quick digression: Maybe 20 years ago I was at a conference in Washington D.C. and a naturalist friend and I decided to visit the National Zoo. We were sitting by the cat exhibit and for the most part the animals were all just lazing around. Except for the mid-size cats. There was this little boy running back and forth with some kind of jingly boots, laughing and making a lot of noise and just generally being a cute little rascal. And all those leopard/cougar-sized cats were chin down, eyes focused intently, and tracking that little boy like house cats track birds through a window. I didn’t notice until my naturalist friend pointed it out. She said “he’s exactly the size of their preferred prey and they trying to stalk him.” Yikes! Creep city!
Anyway, that billboard image up there? Holy cow but that’s just “why wait” stalker bait! An underaged or nearly-underaged girl, curled up submissively, talking about her pussy as an ultimate gift? (Whether because, perhaps, being a woman she doesn’t really have any use for it herself? Or because she just hasn’t yet figured out that she could have expectations and desires of her own. Or even “who cares, if she’s never done it before maybe she’ll think I know what I’m doing.”)
The point being that assuming girls even focus on the marriage part instead of the “ultimate gift to a man” part (and thereby over-romanticizing an early relationship and consequently prematurely “gifting” herself) the overall message is just an open invitation of lust not only to individual women’s individual prospective marriage partners but also to boys who aren’t yet ready to be responsible in their relationships either, and also older, possibly married men as well.
In which case those save-your-cherry,-sweetie lessons better be darn effective because the branding messages in that billboard sure are going to encourage men of all stripes to try overcoming them.
Which, if you were to ask me, is exactly the opposite of giving girls the time and space they need to figure out what they want, when they want it.
Oh, and can we just talk about boys for a minute here? i still don’t see anything in that message (or on that website) about either the benefits of waiting or the consequences of not. (And hmm… one of these days you should ask me about how ready I was the time I was given a “perfect no-strings-attached opportunity” to lose my virginity in 7th grade. And not just me but all the other equally young paperboys in our neighborhood. And how rattled we were. And how, as far as I know, every one of us “chickened out…” a.k.a. weren’t ready.)
Anyway, that billboard? Not ok if you believe in abstinence, and definitely not ok if you don’t.




Submitted by 1843 (not verified) on Sun, 2007-12-30 15:04.
GAH! The double standard makes me sick!
What about HIS virginity? Shouldn't I get just as good a wedding gift? If I've "saved" myself for him, shouldn't he have had to do the same for me?
Let's propose that to the A-O proponents and watch their heads spin 180 degrees.
[As someone else points out further down, there is some reference to not one but but both partner's virginities. I just think, though, that imagining sexual inexperience as "sticking you together" just sort of overloads it with more than, I think, it can usually bear. Thanks, Dawn. --fl]
Submitted by 1843 (not verified) on Sat, 2007-12-29 12:57.
I guess the underlying concept is ownership--a sparkly new piece of property is a great wedding gift, but ugh, who wants a used woman?
And yeah, interesting point about the message to guys--"Taking a woman's virginity is the best thing EVER!" That's kinda creepy.
[Yeah, with the additional problem being that ending virginity's supposed to be the *beginning* of one's sex life, not the clumination, and certainly not the *end!* Thanks, Holly. --fl]
Submitted by 1843 (not verified) on Sat, 2007-12-29 13:11.
As I told you at coffee today, when I saw that image the very first visual I had to compare it to was imagery from the movie Pretty Baby, and you know the scene I'm talking about.
Adding a ring to the picture doesn't change anything for me. Still looks like the same-old same-old super-wonderful historical practice of selling some man a virgin to mark.
[Eww! I've just posted an update, and included your reference to "Pretty Baby," but the images creeped me out enough that I went with a Newsweek cover instead of a still from the movie. Great point, though. Thanks, Heather! --fl]
Submitted by 1843 (not verified) on Sat, 2007-12-29 15:27.
Your brain is a wonderful work of art there.
Tickle tickle.
And a twisted analogy
[Thanks, Adela. And yeah, that's a great, if somewhat tragic, analogy. Thanks! --fl]
Submitted by 1843 (not verified) on Sat, 2007-12-29 08:52.
So, what happened when you were in 7th grade? Do tell. As far as the stalking thing, that is not something I would have thought of. Wow, that billboard is so ick for so many reasons. I checked out their site and they do ask for feedback. It might be helpful to them to hear that perspective. If I were them, I would appreciate someone pointing out what you said.
[Yeah, I really do have to tell that story soon. Thanks, Mag. --fl]
Submitted by 1843 (not verified) on Sat, 2007-12-29 07:24.
You're the kind of guy who wanted to open all his Christmas gifts before Christmas, huh? *grin*
It never occurred to me that something like this would look like a CHALLENGE to the masculine...
Doh!!
[That puts it perfectly, Selena! Especially recognizing the difference between manliness (being a male human being) and masculinity (socially constructed behaviors, constraints, and expectations piled *on top* of being a man.) Manliness says "what the heck is a photo of a kid dolled up in a bed like that doing on a public billboard?" Masculinity conditions us to see the billboard as "Gift-wrapped pussy! Trophy! A luxurious object to measure my worthiness against...! In other words it just triggers the same reactions over-the-top sports car or expensive whiskey ads are designed to create: this is your reward for accomplishment. Another difference between manliness and masculinity, by the way, is that masculinity, taken as it is by symbolism, doesn't care that a virgin is by definition not very good in bed (anymore than femininity cares that really expensive high-heels hurt the feet.) Thanks! --fl]
Submitted by 1843 (not verified) on Sat, 2007-12-29 08:02.
Selena, *everything* is a challenge, if you're traditionally-masculine. And that advert, well, I mean, if it's the ultimate gift, it must be worth getting early and often, right? Because of the sex/no-sex class dichotomy, it's already a challenge to trad-masc to "get" pussy; but that advert just raises the stakes and makes it all the more alluring. The message to the boys out there is, "you know she loves you if she lets you 'do it' with her".
Whether you're talking about physical conquests (still the predominant paradigm for men, alas) or emotional connection, the message from the poster sends all the wrong signals to the male half of society.
If abstinence-only education focussed on teaching boys to abstain, perhaps it would be more useful? But from what I've learned so far about a-o it looks as though the base assumption is that boys are unreachable animals when it comes to sexual morality, and therefore there's no point.
[NB do these reCAPTCHA things take a sneak look at the post they're applied to or something? the words that came up for me this time were "mildly Melting" which strike me as being extremely appropriate for the subject matter here!]