Trophies for whom, trophies for what?

Sat, 2007-09-29 00:05

And since I’ve been passing along short, pithy quotes (sometimes with too much extra commentary) I ought to mention Blue Gal’s brilliant insight into the problem with “trophy wives” and other forms of turning real live partners into commodities:

There are men who think they need arm candy in order to impress other men. They are actually engaging in homoerotic dating, pleasing other men rather than themselves.

Read that and more here.

I’m not quite sure “homoerotic” is exactly right but her point that while beauty is all well and good (really, it’s well and it’s good) when beauty stops being whatever it is in its own right, becomes a proxy for some other form of competition between others of one’s gender then yeah, not so healthy.

Submitted by 1643 (not verified) on Sat, 2007-09-29 11:27.

Yeah I've been musing on that homoerotic term, too, and it's wrong. The term as was used in late '70's feminist lit crit was "homo-social" which is not a sexual term but relates to how men vs. men competition and one-upmanship control how men relate to and value/undervalue women.

Thanks for the link, sweetheart. You know I love the towel series. xo

[Doh! I remember hearing the word "homo-social" from some of my feminist friends back in the 70's. Hadn't thought of that for a while and I guess I haven't seen it yet in any of the source documents I've been reading lately. But yeah, using other human beings as game pieces is, um, kind of weird. Thanks, Blue Gal. --fl]

User login